Revisions to the Highway Code and potential impact on civil liability
The Highway Code has had its first major revision since 2007. Amongst several changes, a new hierarchy has been created, with road users who are most likely to cause harm having the greatest responsibility to reduce the threat they may pose to other road users (rule 204 of the Code).
The Highway Code has had its first major revision since 2007. Historically, all road users were required to be considerate towards each other. That is still the case, but the aim of the Highway Code has now been extended beyond promoting safety to supporting a healthy, sustainable and efficient transport system – in keeping with the drive to support green methods of travel, the revisions are intended to provide greater protection to more vulnerable road users.
Amongst several changes a new hierarchy has been created, with road users who are most likely to cause harm having the greatest responsibility to reduce the threat they may pose to other road users (rule 204 of the Code).
Generally, the priority for road users is as follows: pedestrians>cyclists>horse-riders>motorcyclists>car drivers>HGV drivers.
The likely impact will be that a greater burden will be placed on car, and specifically HGV, drivers to minimise the potential threat or danger they pose to others. Particularly when faced with pedestrians crossing at road junctions and when sharing roads with horse riders, cyclists, or we have to assume those legally using e-scooters.
How might the revisions influence the civil liability position following a road traffic accident?
In reality, courts have been reluctant to absolve a driver of responsibility when faced with a collision involving a car/HGV and a pedestrian or cyclist. The rule changes are likely to formalise that approach and we can see a consistency in a number of decided cases, to include McGeer v McIntosh [2017] EWCA Civ 79. In that case, a HGV Driver was positioned straddling two lanes at traffic lights, intending to turn left. As the HGV turned it collided with the cyclist who had travelled on the inside of the vehicle with the intention of turning left.
The HGV driver was found to be negligent in failing to check their mirrors prior to or during the manoeuvre and whilst the cyclist was also found to be negligent in not assessing the situation, the far greater responsibility rested with the driver – in keeping with the hierarchy now reinforced in the Highway Code, the vulnerability of the cyclist was recognised and the HGV driver attracted 70% of the liability.
The changes to the Highway Code, combined with the approach that is already taken by the courts, are likely to place even more accountability on drivers of vehicles. All road users and employers with fleet vehicles/employees driving in the course of their employment, will need to be alive to the impact and communicate the revisions to the workforce.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Vicarious liability of amateur sports teams for player on player injuries
Legal Update
The future of autonomous technology - August 2023
Legal Update
Part 36 combined offers – when are they beaten?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s patent litigation team praised for being “dynamic” and a “major player” in IAM Patent 1000 guide
Legal Update
Employment alternative dispute resolution
Legal Update
Insolvency practitioners and trustee immunity
Guide
How to manage supply contracts and avoid disputes
Press Release
Browne Jacobson grows inheritance and trust dispute practice with partner hire
On-Demand
'Autonomous vehicles: what the future holds' on-demand
Legal Update
Subsidy control lessons to be learnt from Bulb
Legal Update
Vicarious liability – don’t overlook the importance of close connection
Opinion
Practical points from High Court ruling that Tesco has infringed Lidl’s IP rights in its famous yellow circle logo
Published Article
O Shaped mindset when working with witnesses
Opinion
Mediation – remote or in person?
Opinion
Confirmation of Acas early conciliation in the context of multiple claim forms
Published Article
ClientEarth claim may expand scope of directors' duties
On-Demand
NSIA: the thorn in the side of M&A?
Legal Update
Embargoed judgments: A professional word of caution
Legal Update
High Court dismisses Welsh RSE right to withdraw claim
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Legal Update
Government publishes its proposals for expanding the Scope of the Network and Information Systems Regulations 2018
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - January 2023
Opinion
Civil court litigation 2023: Reforms on the horizon
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - EV charging points: contractual and liability issues to be aware of
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - Grant Funding and Collaboration Agreements
In this session, we examined the legal framework around grant funded collaborations and discussed the key risks to be aware of, including IP ownership and compliance with grant terms.
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - Commercial Contracts
Legal Update
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations?
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
Opinion
Logistics firm fined for multiple failings leading to asbestos exposure
Logistics company Eddie Stobart has been fined £133,000, after a series of failures which took place whilst excavation work was carried out, exposing its staff to asbestos.
Legal Update
Five “takeaways” in claims against mortgage brokers following Taylor v Legal & General Partnership Services Ltd [2022] EWHC 2475 (Ch)
Claims arising from interest-only mortgages have been farmed in volume. Many such claims to date have sought to drive a narrative that interest-only mortgages are an inherently toxic product and brokers were negligent simply for suggesting them. Taylor is a helpful recalibration, focussing instead on what the monies raised by the mortgage product were being used for and whether the client understood the inherent risks.
Opinion
The Future of Mediation
Legal Update
Trigger happy when directors’ duties are the target?
In a judgment handed down yesterday the Supreme Court has affirmed that a so called “creditor duty” exists for directors such that in some circumstances company directors are required to act in accordance with, or to consider the interests of creditors. Those circumstances potentially arise when a company is insolvent or where there is a “probability” of an insolvency. We explore below the “trigger” for such a test to apply and its implications.
Legal Update
The Retained EU Law
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
Legal Update
Failure to comply with PD57AC — it can be costly!
Practice Direction 57AC (“PD57AC”) relates to witness evidence in trials and explicitly applies only to the Business and Property Courts. It applies to existing proceedings in which the witness statements for trial are signed on or after 6 April 2021.
Opinion
Sequana: Supreme clarification on the duty owed to creditors
The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the BTI v Sequana appeal and reviewed the existence, content and engagement of the so-called ‘creditor duty’; being the point at which the interest of creditors is said to intrude upon the decision-making of directors of companies in financial distress.
Legal Update
Common AI related technology project disputes and how to prevent them
The increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionising the way businesses operate and is having a disruptive impact in sectors that have traditionally been slow to modernise.
Published Article
The problematic transition to electric vehicles - what is the impact on manufacturing
It was reported in May 2022 that the BMW-owned manufacturer had been forced to put a temporary stop on the production of all manual transmission vehicles due to the global semi-conductor shortage and the war in Ukraine. Mini stated that the move was made in order to "ensure production stability".
Legal Update
The Civil Justice Council’s (CJC) proposed reforms to the Pre-Action Protocols (PAPs) and the possible mandatory ADR gateway. What could this mean for your case?
In November 2021, The Civil Justice Council’s published its interim report on proposed changes to the current Pre-Action Protocols, which included a mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) gateway. In this article, we look at proposed reforms and consider what this could mean for your case.
Opinion
Job applicant receives settlement due to unlawful age discrimination at interview
Janice Walsh applied for a job with Domino’s Pizza, hoping to secure a role as a Delivery Driver. However things quickly took a turn for the worse during her initial interview, with the very first question that she was asked relating to her age. Ms Walsh was ultimately informed that she had not been successful in her application.
