We support a significant number of schools and trusts each year against claims of discrimination made by parents or pupils, relating to education. Most of those claims are in the First-Tier Tribunal relating to disability discrimination, the same tribunal that considers claims from parents linked to Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs).
In December, the Upper Tribunal, on an appeal we made on behalf of a school, considered the reasonable adjustment duty for schools under the Equality Act 2010 and specifically the amendments for schools.
A Multi Academy Trust v RR 
These amendments had not been considered in any detail by the Courts, but in this case, A Multi Academy Trust v RR , the Upper Tribunal explicitly considered these amendments.
The case related to a special school and a pupil, SR, whose parent had brought a claim for discrimination. Whilst most of the claims were dismissed by the First Tier-Tribunal, one claim relating to a lack of a documented transition plan to the school, was found to amount to discrimination.
“Errors of law”
The appeal to the Upper Tribunal was on the basis that the First-Tier Tribunal had made errors of law and not given adequate reasons for the decision.
Specifically, the reasonable adjustment duty in section 20 of the Act, whilst usually being about overcoming disadvantage to the pupil or person concerned, is amended in a school context where the relevant provision, criterion or practice (“PCP”) that needs adjustments made to it relates to education, access to a benefit, facility or service.
In RR, the Upper Tribunal confirmed that a transition plan to the school was related to education and so the amendments applied. The Upper Tribunal, with reference to other existing cases that considered similar provisions in the Equality Act 2010, confirmed in RR that where the amendments apply, parliament’s intention was that the disadvantage of the PCP needed to be on a group of pupils, not just the individual pupil concerned.
What does this mean in practice?
In practice, this means that in reasonable adjustment claims relating to pupils about educational provision or services or benefits provided, parent claimants will need to be clear on the group of pupils that the PCP disadvantages, beyond their own child.
The Upper Tribunal accepted that identifying this group would be difficult in some cases and additionally we suspect that the evidential burden will also be more difficult on parent/pupil claimants, given the need to show not just disadvantage to their child, but to a wider group of pupils.
The Upper Tribunal agreed that there had been an error of law in the relevant case and related lack of reasons, overturning the First Tier Tribunal’s decision and referring it back for reconsideration.
You may be interested in...
New case on the reasonable adjustment duty for pupils in schools
Half of school leaders think Ofsted does not have the expertise for Multi-Academy Trust inspections, according to new survey
School leaders survey – the results are in!
FAQs - converting to academy status
Children's commissioner recommendations for SEND reform
The Children’s Commissioner, Rachel De Souza, has recently published a report “Beyond the labels: a SEND system which works for every child, every time”, which she intends to sit alongside the DfE’s SEND Review (2019) and SEND Green Paper (2022) and which she hopes will put children’s voices at the heart of the government’s review of SEND system.
Law firm picks up record breaking sixth Education Investor Award
Browne Jacobson’s education team has been named as winner of the ‘Legal Advisors to Education Institutions’ category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.
Browne Jacobson’s market leading Education expertise recognised again in latest Legal 500 rankings
The new set of Legal 500 directory rankings have been published and we are proud to once again be recognised as one of the country’s leading firms advising the Education sector.
Key steps to avoid falling foul of disability discrimination laws
The law around disability discrimination against pupils is not straightforward – but the reputational risk, let alone costs, of falling foul of the law are huge, so it’s worth upskilling staff whenever possible, as these two lawyers outline.
Browne Jacobson’s C-suite exec level coaching team appoints two new education specialists
National law firm Browne Jacobson has grown its team behind its dedicated Space + Time executive coaching programme with the addition of two more qualified coaches who will work with clients in the education sector.
The Disabled Students Commission – supporting students on their journey through higher education
Schools and education authorities in England have had a duty to provide reasonable adjustments for disabled pupils since 2002. Disabled pupils have been supported in this way within the school environment but what can they expect as they continue their education journey into higher education?
Advocacy in Action: school places during a national pandemic
In this second Advocacy in Action update, we consider the issue of claims arising from school placements during Covid-19 lockdown.
Department for Education (DfE) guidance on educational provision during lockdown
The government decision on lockdown and the subsequent Department for Education (DfE) guidance vulnerable children and the children of critical workers and actions for schools to take during lockdown.
Admissions Code consultation
The Department for Education (DfE) is currently consulting on a draft version of the School Admissions Code.
Admissions during Covid-19
Whilst the Department for Education (DfE) has implemented statutory changes to elements of the frameworks relating to admission appeals, exclusions and special educational needs, there have been no changes relating to the legislation relating to admissions.
Covid19: changes to special educational needs and disability (SEND) legislation
The DfE has published a notice under the Coronavirus Act 2020 as well as amending regulations and guidance which make some changes to the special educational needs and disability (SEND) framework arising from the Children & Families Act 2014 and the SEND Regulations 2014.
Coronavirus – guidance to social care and schools on vulnerable children and young people
With Covid-19 expected to place a substantial burden on statutory services and school closures being put into effect, the Government has now issued guidance on continued protection of this group.
In the first of what we hope will become a regular feature in Be Connected, Nick MacKenzie reviews what’s on the horizon for the education sector and briefly shares with you a number of themes.
Review of SEND Framework
Is the SEND system working?
A recent report from the Local Government Ombudsman has highlighted significant concerns with the operation of the SEND system which is resulting in 87% of parental complaints against local authorities on SEND being upheld by the Ombudsman.
Next steps for SEN funding
The Secretary of State for Education is reportedly announcing a call for evidence on the issue of SEN funding today.
SEND funding not matching demand
Recent reports from the National Education Union conference have reinforced the current issues arising out of funding the support that children with SEND require.
Challenges to SEND funding
A recent High Court decision has confirmed that the use of funding bands to allocate funding to children with Education Health & Care Plans is not unlawful and is sufficient to meet the duties placed on local authorities to secure special educational provision set out in such a plan.
PRU and exclusion surge continues
Latest figures show that the number of primary aged pupils in PRUs has seen a sharp increase.
A recent judicial review case taken by an academy trust against a local authority has provided some useful guidance for schools when dealing with requests to admit children with EHCPs.