The government decision on lockdown and the subsequent Department for Education (DfE) guidance vulnerable children and the children of critical workers and actions for schools to take during lockdown.
Please note: the information contained in this legal update is correct as of the original date of publication.
The government decision on lockdown and the subsequent Department for Education (DfE) guidance on, firstly, vulnerable children and the children of critical workers and, secondly, actions for schools to take during lockdown, have resulted in a number of questions from schools on issues which fall outside the current guidance available.
One area of concern is around how the lockdown affects existing procedures within schools – admission decisions and appeals; exclusion decisions and reviews; and also complaints. Such matters are not covered by the existing guidance, but in our view the DfE guidance provides a clear basis for schools to continue to make decisions in these areas. The DfE guidance is written on the basis that schools will remain open, albeit only for a limited number of pupils who fit the vulnerable/critical worker categories. Schools have not been required to close and there has not been any direction issued by the DfE under the Coronavirus Act 2020 to require closure. As such, schools remain open, with attendance registers being taken for those in attendance physically, and the definition of ‘school day” will apply.
This position has consequences for schools. Many of the statutory processes, such as those relating to admissions or exclusions and local policies/procedures (e.g. a formal complaint process), require actions to be taken, and rely on the definition of “school day” to provide a timescale for those actions. During the current lockdown, those timescales will continue to apply and action will be required across these areas, i.e. complaints will need to be investigated and responses provided in line with the relevant timescales, and exclusion reviews held either by governing boards or independent review panels within the timescales set out in the School Discipline Regulations 2012 and exclusions guidance (2017). Where a school needs to consider admission applications and its admission arrangements set out a timescale for this, it will be expected to make those decisions in line with its published arrangements.
It is worth noting that under the amendments brought in by the DfE in 2020 to the legal framework for admission appeals and exclusion reviews, there are already some variations to procedures which schools must consider. In relation to admission appeals, the amending regulations have removed reliance on “school days” within the School Admission Appeals Code 2012. However, those amending regulations are due to expire at the end of January 2021, although it is expected that further regulations on this issue will be forthcoming to ensure the possibility of remote admission appeals being utilised for the main appeals during the Summer Term until September 2021. In relation to exclusions, the amending regulations are in place until 24 March 2021. It would be expected that the regulations will be extended to allow remote hearings to continue in relation to exclusions and to continue the extension of timescales for parents to lodge a request for an independent review.
It will be important for schools to recognise this slight change in approach from the DfE in respect of schools being open and consider any current issues which may require action during the current lockdown.
If you need specific advice on the procedures to be adopted or in relation to any concerns raised with the school, please contact Richard or other members of the education team.
There’s been little evidence of interventions or financial management reviews this year and it appears the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) has re-focussed on financial delivery. It’s also telling that there were no discernible changes to the reporting of financial irregularities in the Academies Trust Handbook 2022.
The Children’s Commissioner, Rachel De Souza, has recently published a report “Beyond the labels: a SEND system which works for every child, every time”, which she intends to sit alongside the DfE’s SEND Review (2019) and SEND Green Paper (2022) and which she hopes will put children’s voices at the heart of the government’s review of SEND system.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHCR) recently issued new, non-statutory guidance regarding the wearing of natural or protective hairstyles, specifically in reference to their representation in uniform, behaviour or standalone appearance policies.
There’s greater opportunity than ever for parents, carers and guardians to voice any concerns they have relating to their child’s education and for their concerns to be heard and to be taken seriously. While most staff in schools and academies are conscious of their legal duties relating to complaints management, many are struggling to cope with such a significant increase in the volume of complaints they must manage.
We’re pleased to collaborate with Lloyds Bank, who recently asked us and audit and risk specialists Crowe UK to offer guidance that academy trusts would find helpful when considering setting up a trading subsidiary.
The DfE has published new guidance and opened the application process for window two of the Trust Capacity Fund (TCaF) for 2022/2023, with a fund of £86m in trust capacity funding focused particularly on education investment areas.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse was established in March 2015. We now have its report. As you would expect with such a broad scope, the report is long and makes a number of far-reaching recommendations. In this article, Dai Durbridge highlights seven of the 20 recommendations, sets out how they could impact on schools and suggests what steps to take now.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has been named as winner of the ‘Legal Advisors to Education Institutions’ category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.
Since the new Suspensions and Exclusions Statutory Guidance was published, we have received a lot of questions about the use of managed moves. For the first time, the Statutory Guidance does explain what a managed move is, but in relatively broad terms and does not cover the mechanics of how a managed move should operate.
Over 3000 young people from across the UK and Ireland took part in a virtual legal careers insight event, aimed at making the legal profession more diverse.
Holly Quirk, an associate barrister in Browne Jacobson’s Manchester office, was awarded the Legal Professional of the Year Award at this year’s Manchester Young Talent Awards.
The risk of assault against staff is, sadly, something that all schools need to consider carefully. Here one legal expert explains what they can do to protect staff and ensure they fulfil their duty of care.
Two directors of a construction company were fined after failing to ensure the safe removal of asbestos from a plot of land. On 14 and 15 November 2021, Directors Anthony Sumner and Neil Brown, of Waterbarn Limited were involved in the uncontrolled removal of asbestos material from a plot of land in Grasscroft, Oldham.
An engineering company in Tyne and Wear was fined £20,000 after a worker fractured his pelvis and suffered internal injuries after falling through a petrol station forecourt canopy, whilst he was replacing the guttering.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has again been confirmed as a national powerhouse after securing five Tier 1 rankings relating to Education in the latest edition of Legal 500 and maintaining a Band 1 UK-wide ranking for Education in Chambers & Partners UK 2023.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
