Whilst the main purpose of an inquest is to determine how a person came by their death, a coroner must also consider whether the evidence reveals ongoing concerning circumstances that create a risk of other deaths occurring in the future. Where such a risk exists, a coroner is under a duty to issue a report to Prevent Future Deaths, commonly known as a PFD report (or a Regulation 28 report).
In a healthcare context, a PFD report can be an important tool to improve public health, welfare and safety. Healthcare organisations can learn and improve not only from PFD reports that are issued directly to them, but also from PFD reports concerning organisations of a similar nature. With that in mind, we have reviewed 34 PFD reports concerning mental health related deaths, which were published between June 2022 and June 2023. We have analysed these reports to identify common themes and issues arising nationwide.
Summary
A PFD report can refer to multiple issues or risks that have arisen out of one inquest. We identified 63 key issues arising from the 34 PFD reports we looked at. We considered that those 63 issues could be broken down into seven main themes or categories – clinical practice/procedure, training, resources, monitoring/audits, post death investigation, policy/guidance and multi-agency working. The chart below summarises how frequently each issue arose:

Clinical practice or procedure
Issues relating to clinical practice and procedure were varied. However, a common issue that arose was in relation to risk assessments and risk management plans. Several coroners were concerned that risk assessments were not sufficiently detailed. Further, that risk management or care plans were not comprehensive enough to manage the identified risks, or in some instances not created at all. As one Senior Coroner noted, “There was a lack of a clear clinical assessment and plan to investigate and deal with repeated self-harm attempts that could result in serious injury or death as well as the repeated access to and use of ligatures.”
The failure to involve family members and carers in risk assessments and risk management plans was also identified in a number of inquests.
Insufficient patient observations were another common issue. In several cases, patient observations were not being completed as directed and accurate records were not being kept by staff.
Resources
“Resources” encompassed staff shortages, insufficient service provision, funding issues, long waiting times and inadequate assessment tools. It was highlighted in two inquests that there is a lack of mental health services for older adults. One inquest heard that older age psychiatric teams are poorly resourced nationally. Coroners raised concerns about the shortage of inpatient beds, insufficient psychotherapy community services and a lack of establishments suitably designed for dual physical and mental health needs in later life.
The underfunding of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) was also highlighted. One coroner raised concerns about long waiting times for children to be assessed and the shortage of child psychiatrists, psychologists and mental health nurses. One Senior Coroner commented that, “It became very clear during the inquest that there is significant under funding of the local mental health Trust who, like many mental health Trusts, have seen an explosion of referrals to their CAMHS service. Despite the increase in numbers accessing CAMHS there has not been any relative increase in resources to meet this demand and therefore the current position is unsustainable and it is putting many young people’s lives at risk.” Those concerns were addressed to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care to respond to.
Two inquests also raised concerns about care coordinators in community mental health teams (CMHTs). It was highlighted that care coordinators typically have the most comprehensive view of a patient, however, CMHTs often do not have enough care coordinators. Coroners impressed the need for more funding to be made available to CMHTs, but also for Trusts to make the role more attractive and for there to be more consistency across Trusts as to how care coordinators are expected to fulfil their role. One Area Coroner noted that, “There are not enough care coordinators within the Trust and there are high turnovers of staff. Efforts need to be made to make the post of care coordinator more attractive. There has been an increase in the number of referrals coming into the service. There has been no commensurate increase in the number of care co-ordinators.”
One inquest focussed on a Trust’s Liaison and Diversion (L&D) service. The coroner highlighted that it was originally intended that L&D services would commission psychiatrists, but this did not ever come to fruition. After hearing expert evidence, the coroner concluded that L&D services need readily available advice and support from a consultant psychiatrist. The coroner’s concern was addressed to NHS England to answer.
One coroner raised concerns about the Wales Applied Risk Research Network (WARRN) assessment tool, which is used throughout Wales. The coroner considered that there were flaws with the format and layout of the WARRN, and that it did not provide a professional with clear and easily viewable information as to how a person’s risk of self-harm had fluctuated or changed. The coroner was concerned this could lead to an underestimation of risk and sub-optimal risk management measures being put in place.
Post death investigations
In nine inquests, coroners were either concerned that an inadequate post death investigation had been conducted by (or on behalf of) the healthcare body, or insufficient learning/remedial action had been implemented following the patient’s death. In one inquest, even when the healthcare organisation involved had commissioned an external company to conduct a review of the death, the coroner did not consider the investigation to be sufficient. The authors did not obtain all the relevant documents, did not ask staff to prepare statements and failed to investigate important matters. In another inquest, a Senior Coroner found that, “The Trust’s internal investigation did not consider the full extent of the deceased’s contacts with mental health services, lacked any meaningful critical analysis of events and omitted to seek to explore fundamental issues such as access to services from the patient’s perspective. As a consequence, the Trust has not taken the opportunity to learn from the death.”
Concerns were raised in several inquests that the family of the deceased had not been included in the post death investigation, even when the family had been involved in caring for the deceased prior to their death.
Policy or guidance
On a local level, one coroner raised concerns that the staff involved in a particular inquest gave conflicting and unclear evidence about Trust policies, namely referral processes into community teams and patient response times. Another coroner highlighted that a Trust did not have a specific policy regarding sexual harassment or assault, or a policy focusing specifically on communication with family members, and raised this as a concern.
On a national level, one coroner wrote to the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), highlighting the absence of national guidance for perimeter fencing and security outside areas of mental health locked wards. In another inquest, the DHSC was also asked to consider extending the section 136 Mental Health Act powers so that a person could be detained for a few days in order to help him through a period of crisis. (In its response to the PFD, the DHSC did not agree to do this.)
Multi-agency working
Concerns with multi-agency working were raised in six inquests. One coroner highlighted the complex relationship between epilepsy and mental health, and expressed concern about the “general lack of communication throughout the NHS between community psychiatric teams and neurology teams, across England and Wales.” Another coroner expressed concern about the inadequate information sharing between a patient’s GP and their mental health team.
Comment
Many of the themes we found were similar, so it will be helpful for mental health providers and commissioners to reflect on these when considering their own systems, processes and investigations. Trusts are now being asked to improve learning more generally under the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF). The PSIRF sets out the NHS’s approach to developing and maintaining effective systems and processes for responding to patient safety incidents for the purpose of learning and improving patient safety. Browne Jacobson has extensive experience of advising mental healthcare providers and commissioner on inquest processes and procedures, including PFD reports, investigations and representation at inquest.
If you would like further advice or guidance on inquests or any of the issues highlighted in this article, please do get in touch. From the outset of a matter, we provide support at whatever level your team needs, from standalone reviews of statements and internal investigations to full advice on legal issues, disclosure of documents and likely determinations. Many of our team have worked in house and therefore have detailed insight into what clients need and want from their legal support.
We support in-house teams through our popular ‘Shared Insights’ forum which brings together in-house teams from across the country, and shares knowledge on the biggest issues facing organisations. Our ‘Mock Inquest training sessions’ also provide valuable practical advice and tools for governance and risk, complaints, family liaison and in-house legal teams.

Simon Tait
Partner
simon.tait@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 976 6559
You may be interested in...
Online Event - Shared Insights
Shared Insights with Irwin Mitchell: Improving communication with patients and families
Legal Update
Jurisdiction of the First-tier Mental Health Tribunal in the context of remote assessments under the Mental Health Act: recent developments
Legal Update
Improving patient safety incident and complaint responses to rebuild broken trust
Legal Update
Section 117 after-care services – who should pay?
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroner’s Question Time
Legal Update
Inquests and Article 2 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) A practical guide following the case of Maguire
Legal Update
Learning from Reports to Prevent Future Deaths in Mental Health settings - A Review of PFDs nationally 2022-2023
Legal Update
Navigating the complexities of detention: insights from a recent Mental Health Act / Mental Capacity Act interface case
Legal Update
Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS) update – June 2023
Legal Update
Restricting a patient’s use of their mobile phone – is it lawful?
Legal Update
Reports to Prevent Future Deaths: What are the issues affecting ambulance trusts nationally?
Online Event
Mock Inquest Training Sessions
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: PSIRF and what it means for Independent Providers
Legal Update
Supreme Court will hear Worcestershire case on local authority responsibility for Section 117 Aftercare in April 2023
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners’ Question Time
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - January 2023
Opinion
Coroner’s refusal to issue a Prevention of Future Deaths Report following death in prison custody inquest was lawful
Article
Mental health, eating disorders and placement of young people
Legal Update
LPS consultation and ‘go live’ planning
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Prolonged disorders of consciousness
On-Demand
Insights from the Chief Coroner by His Honour Judge Thomas Teague, KC
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Focus on emergency medicine
In our latest Shared Insights session, Focus on Emergency Medicine, chaired by Jennifer Fagin and Amelia Newbold, we were pleased to be joined by: Dr Alex Crowe, Deputy Director Incentive Schemes & Academic Partnerships, NHS Resolution and Consultant Nephrologist and Miss Susie Hewitt MBE, Consultant in Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust.
Legal Update
Liberty Protection Safeguards: points to note as consultation period continues
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards was due to transition to Liberty Protection Safeguards in October 2020 but delayed due to the pandemic. While the public consultation has now closed and we’re still unclear of what the final legislation and code will look like, it’s worth noting and keeping a watching brief.
Legal Update
Health and Care Regulation – The Present and the Future
In this article, we discuss some of the themes we have seen in recent CQC regulation as well as providing an update on the development of their new assessment framework. I will also highlight other key developments in the sector that all providers should be aware of.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners' Question Time
In this session, our speakers discussed fundamentals of disclosure, general points on disclosure & Post-Pandemic, interested Persons & Patient Safety Incident Response, and how we can help & Takeaway Tips.
On-Demand
LPS - it's out - what do you need to know? Part 3: the practicalities of implementation
This on-demand session deals with what we now know so far about the finer detail of the LPS proposals, particularly focussing on the practicalities of implementing the LPS system.Legal Update
The Liberty Protection Safeguards – how can we help?
The Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS) were introduced in the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019 and will replace the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) system. The LPS framework aims to deliver improved outcomes for people who are or who need to be deprived of their liberty.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Overview of inquests in relation to deaths in custody
In this session, our speakers discussed gave an overview of inquests in relation to deaths in custody and discussed three key themes; Documentation Provision, Communication, and Decision making. They also discussed Healthcare in a prison setting - manging the unique challenges.
On-Demand
LPS - it's out - what do you need to know? Part 2: the most significant changes
This on-demand session considers some of the most significant changes to the Code.Legal Update
Liberty Protection Safeguards – It’s out: MCA LPS Consultation
Following on from the first webinar in the Liberty Protection Safeguards (“LPS”) series delivered by Mark Barnett and Chris Stark, the key points below from the webinar are summarised below.
On-Demand
LPS - it's out - what do you need to know?' Part 1: Regulations and Code of Practice
This on-demand session deals with what we now know so far about the finer detail of the LPS proposals, particularly focussing on the practicalities of implementing the LPS system.Opinion
LPS - it’s out
The long-awaited draft Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice, including the Liberty Protection Safeguards (“LPS”), has landed.
Legal Update
Liberty Protection Safeguards: What are they and will they ever happen?
Legal Update
The Liberty Protection Safeguards: brief update
The Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS) will be used to authorise the proportionate and necessary deprivation of liberty for people aged 16 and above who lack the mental capacity to consent to their care arrangements.
On-Demand
Mental Health and Court of Protection Legal Update webinar
Watch now on-demand our Mental Health and Court of Protection Legal Update webinar, there have been some interesting recent legal developments in this area and topics that were covered during the session.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Safeguarding Forum - Safe discharge and conveyance of patients
It is important to bear in mind the legal framework when planning discharge and conveyance plans but practicalities are also key.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners’ Question Time, part 2
The panel of experienced Coroners gave an outline of the current backlog and the pandemic recovery plan implemented in their jurisdiction.
Training - Maternity services
Maternity mock inquest - film 1
Consent is often a key issue in obstetric claims and if it is relevant to the facts of the death, its likely to be an area explored by a coroner.
Training - Maternity services
Maternity mock inquest - film 2
This video illustrates some of the issues that can arise when a witness is poorly prepared.
Training - Maternity services
Maternity mock inquest - film 3
This film highlights the importance of creating an open and transparent culture where staff feel able to speak up will help Trusts to identify problematic practise before significant issues arise.