Flexible working, childcare and indirect sex discrimination – important reminder
The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’).
The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’). This recognition has historically assisted women who make claims for indirect sex discrimination on the basis of a requirement to work flexibly applied to both men and women which has a particular disadvantageous effect on women due to the childcare disparity.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal confirmed last week in Dobson v North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust that the childcare disparity still persists in 2021 despite advances being made to address the inequality in recent years. It does not necessarily follow that in all cases where the childcare disparity applies, there will be a group disadvantage. It also does not necessarily follow that if in a particular case a woman can establish that a requirement to work flexibly puts her to a disadvantage due to childcare responsibilities, the employment tribunal should assume that it also puts women as a group to a disadvantage due to the childcare disparity. However, in some cases, such an inference may be appropriate, requiring the employer to objectively justify the flexible working requirement to avoid a finding of indirect sex discrimination.
Although the Employment Appeal Tribunal recognised that this assumption may become inappropriate in the future as further progress is made on sharing the childcare burden more equally, it noted that the position is still far from equal.
Whilst this case represents a re-statement of the current law and is perhaps not as landmark as reported in the media, it is an important reminder to employers that care must be taken in reaching decisions on working patterns in relation to employees with childcare responsibilities. Employers should take care to ensure that any decisions that could put a working parent to a disadvantage go no further than is necessary, are justified and are properly recorded. If employers are in any doubt, they should seek professional advice.
Contact
Mark Hickson
Head of Business Development
onlineteaminbox@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)370 270 6000
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises SKIMS on lease of a landmark Regent Street store
Legal Update
The Assisted Dying Bill: What health and social care professionals need to know
In Person Event
Private Patient Units: expanding through partnership – views from private sector providers
Online Event
Legal principles of workforce change management in the NHS and the people dimension
Legal Update
Significant amendments to the Employment Rights Bill unveiled
Legal Update
Consultation on the new School Support Staff Negotiating Body
Legal Update
What does the 10-year health plan mean for social care?
Legal Update
The Government’s 10-Year Health Plan: What’s in it for mental health?
In Person Event
Mock Employment Tribunal
Legal Update - Employment Rights Bill
The Employment Rights Bill: Is it here yet?
Legal Update
Building sustainable NHS-private sector partnerships: Expanding private patient units and beyond
Legal Update
NHS private patient units: Expanding via partnerships and key considerations
Legal Update
Top 10 considerations when expanding an NHS private patient unit
Legal Update
How to expand an NHS private patient unit: Practical guidance
Press Release
10-year health plan: Reaction from Browne Jacobson's health and life sciences team
Legal Update - Mindful insights
Mindful insights: June 2025
Opinion
Pride Month: A time to review DEI
Guide
Legal project management: A cornerstone in operational delivery of inquiries
Opinion
National maternity investigation launched: Enhancing care and addressing inequalities
Opinion
Employer redundancy guide: Sourcing alternative employment
Press Release - Firm news
Browne Jacobson delivers record-breaking growth as strategic vision drives exceptional performance
Legal Update
What might the public inquiry on child sexual exploitation look like
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights safeguarding forum: Focus on self-neglect
Legal Update
DEI in school governance: Key themes and insights
Guide
Using AI for recruitment: The data issues
Guide
The socio-economic duty: Shifting mindsets for true social mobility
Press Release
Spending Review 2025: Browne Jacobson lawyers respond to Chancellor’s announcement
Legal Update
PPU roundtable 2: Advancing private patient units
Legal Update
Trans matters in health for trusts and acute settings: The decision in For Women Scotland
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s School Leaders Survey illustrates concerns over financial resilience ahead of spending review
Legal Update
ESG and sustainability report: Rethinking communication and credibility
Press Release
Majority of UK organisations remain committed to sustainability and ESG, says new research
Legal Update
Producing robust capacity assessments and the approaches to assessing capacity
On-Demand - Care Focus webinar series
Care Focus: Critical incidents and managing risks
Legal Update
Can those with a probate claim access a deceased patient’s records?
Press Release
UK-EU reset deal: Comments from Browne Jacobson experts
Opinion
Tackling inequalities in maternity care: NHS Providers' call for bold action
Opinion
Disciplinary procedures and mental health: Employer considerations
Opinion
Supreme Court gender ruling: Ensuring inclusion in the workplace
