Flexible working, childcare and indirect sex discrimination – important reminder
The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’).
The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’). This recognition has historically assisted women who make claims for indirect sex discrimination on the basis of a requirement to work flexibly applied to both men and women which has a particular disadvantageous effect on women due to the childcare disparity.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal confirmed last week in Dobson v North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust that the childcare disparity still persists in 2021 despite advances being made to address the inequality in recent years. It does not necessarily follow that in all cases where the childcare disparity applies, there will be a group disadvantage. It also does not necessarily follow that if in a particular case a woman can establish that a requirement to work flexibly puts her to a disadvantage due to childcare responsibilities, the employment tribunal should assume that it also puts women as a group to a disadvantage due to the childcare disparity. However, in some cases, such an inference may be appropriate, requiring the employer to objectively justify the flexible working requirement to avoid a finding of indirect sex discrimination.
Although the Employment Appeal Tribunal recognised that this assumption may become inappropriate in the future as further progress is made on sharing the childcare burden more equally, it noted that the position is still far from equal.
Whilst this case represents a re-statement of the current law and is perhaps not as landmark as reported in the media, it is an important reminder to employers that care must be taken in reaching decisions on working patterns in relation to employees with childcare responsibilities. Employers should take care to ensure that any decisions that could put a working parent to a disadvantage go no further than is necessary, are justified and are properly recorded. If employers are in any doubt, they should seek professional advice.
Contact
Mark Hickson
Head of Business Development
onlineteaminbox@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)370 270 6000
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Press Release
‘Privacy by design’ approach will help health and care organisations gain public trust in using technology as ICO publishes new guidance
Legal Update
Understanding the ICO's new fining guidance
Opinion - Maternity services
Newborns born outside of hospitals at higher risk of hypothermia during emergency responses
Guide
Demystifying international healthcare contracting
On-Demand
Shared Insights: Preparing and delivering organisational learning evidence in the Coroner’s Court
Opinion
Can teachers personal and political views amount to misconduct?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson to advise East London Waste Authority on major waste programme
Legal Update
ICO consultation on accessing care records: A legal perspective
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights round up - Spring 2024
Legal Update
Government updates guidance on holiday rules: What employers need to know
Legal Update
Court of Protection rules on capacity and best interests in pregnancy termination case involving detained woman
Online Event - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: focus on the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF)
Legal Update
Holiday pay: Government change clarifies treatment of term time only workers
Legal Update
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
Legal Update
Employment Healthcare Briefing - March 2024
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Greater Manchester Combined Authority on its investment in Beryl
Legal Update
The importance of including temporary staff in NHS patient safety investigations
Opinion
School attendance matters
Legal Update
Death certification reform in England and Wales – how will healthcare providers and commissioners be affected?
Opinion
Government’s Spring Budget invests millions in maternity safety
Opinion - Maternity services
Health Service Journal reports on growing trend of “free birthing”
Legal Update - Maternity services
Introduction of baby loss certificates gives recognition to millions of bereaved families in the UK
Legal Update
Charity law update – March 2024
Legal Update
NHS England publishes updated guidance on NHS subsidiary companies
Opinion
Caregivers at work: Navigating new carer's leave regulations
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Sexual safety in the workplace — how leaders can help to create a sexual safety culture
Opinion
EHRC publishes new guidance on menopause and the workplace
Legal Update - Health and Care Connect
Health and Care Connect: Health Check - March 2024
Legal Update
Braceurself Ltd v NHS England 2024: Court of Appeal procurement case decision
Opinion
Fire and re-hire: Updated statutory code summary for employers
Legal Update
Mental health law round up – February 2024
Legal Update - Maternity services
Chesterfield Royal Hospital ranked amongst the top Trusts nationally in the 2023 Maternity Survey
Published Article
Planning the future of healthcare
Legal Update
How do holiday pay reforms affect the education sector?
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Giving evidence before the Family Court - a practical session
Legal Update
Updated guidance on COPDOL11 (Re X) applications
Opinion - Maternity services
Coronial investigations of stillbirths - summary of consultation responses
Legal Update
Revised Acas Code of Practice on requests for flexible working
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Improving communication with families through the inquest process
