Covid-19 vaccine beliefs held to be religious in nature
In Wierowska v HC-One Oval Limited, the Employment Tribunal had to determine whether the Claimant’s beliefs in relation to Covid-19 vaccines amounted to religious beliefs for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010.
In Wierowska v HC-One Oval Limited, the Employment Tribunal had to determine whether the Claimant’s beliefs in relation to Covid-19 vaccines amounted to religious beliefs for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. The Claimant, a Roman Catholic care worker, asserted that one of the reasons for her dismissal was that she refused on religious grounds to take a Covid-19 vaccine. At a preliminary hearing to consider the issue, the Claimant’s beliefs were explored in more detail, including the fact that the Vatican had previously issued a statement to the effect that the vaccines were “morally acceptable”.
The Respondent asserted that the views held by the Claimant were not religious beliefs but rather opinions based on the fact that she was unconvinced by the current evidence available as to the safety (or effects) of the vaccines available. The Employment Judge disagreed, finding that the concerns held by some members of the Catholic community about Covid-19 vaccines were “closely linked to the longstanding Catholic position on abortion and to the resulting opposition to the use of stem cells or foetal material in medical experiments of any sort. They are therefore part and parcel of a fundamental view about the sanctity of human life.” As a result, the Claimant’s views about the vaccine were held to be “intimately connected with her religious faith”, entitling her to rely on that religious faith as a protected characteristic.
It should be of no surprise that certain religious beliefs can affect an individual’s views on vaccination. However, the decision does highlight the difficulties that some employers have faced where asserted beliefs do not appear to align with the orthodox principles of that religion, and/or run contrary to scientific evidence available. In this case, the fact that the Vatican had issued a statement taking a contrary stance did not affect the finding that the Claimant’s beliefs still amounted to religious beliefs. And the Claimant’s resistance to scientific evidence and “stubbornness” was taken by the Tribunal to support the strength of the Claimant’s beliefs.
Contact
Mark Hickson
Head of Business Development
onlineteaminbox@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)370 270 6000
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Executive pay and the Academy Trust Handbook: Clarity, challenge and good governance
Opinion
Pride Month: A time to review DEI
Opinion
Employer redundancy guide: Sourcing alternative employment
Legal Update
DEI in school governance: Key themes and insights
Guide
Using AI for recruitment: The data issues
Guide
The socio-economic duty: Shifting mindsets for true social mobility
Legal Update
Trans matters in health for trusts and acute settings: The decision in For Women Scotland
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s School Leaders Survey illustrates concerns over financial resilience ahead of spending review
Press Release
Majority of UK organisations remain committed to sustainability and ESG, says new research
Opinion
Addressing the gender pay gap in school trusts
Legal Update
The FCA proposes removal of mandatory CPD hours for insurance sector
Opinion
Disciplinary procedures and mental health: Employer considerations
Opinion
Supreme Court gender ruling: Ensuring inclusion in the workplace
On-Demand
Shaping a culture of respect and harmony: Managing competing beliefs
Legal Update
Celebrating diversity and inclusion in the NHS: Equality, Diversity, and Human Rights Week 2025
Legal Update
Supporting mental wellbeing in the workplace: Practical steps for businesses
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Perils and pitfalls of social media in the health and care sector
Legal Update
A New chapter for families: Reflecting on the first month of the introduction of neonatal care leave
Legal Update
Trans matters in care: The decision in For Women Scotland
Legal Update
Trans matters in sport: The decision in For Women Scotland
Opinion
EHRC releases guidance for employers after Supreme Court ruling on definition of woman
Legal Update
Unfunded pay rise for teachers risks strikes, tension, restructures and budget crisis
Legal Update
2025/26 employment rates and limits: Are costs increases having a negative impact on the job market?
Legal Update
Supreme Court ruling on trans women: What schools need to know
Legal Update
The concept of sex is binary: For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers Supreme Court case explained
Legal Update
Updated Modern Slavery Act Transparency Guidance: Key obligations and steps for businesses
Legal Update
Do whistleblowing protections extend to external job applicants?
Article - Employment Rights Bill
The Employment Rights Bill: What the new amendments mean for employers
Legal Update
How academy trusts can avoid disputes over recruitment agency fees
On-Demand - Care Focus webinar series
Care Focus: Regulatory and employment
Legal Update
Fair conduct dismissal: Guidance from the Court of Appeal
Legal Update
Employment healthcare briefing: March 2025
Press Release
Comments on the governments plans to abolish NHS England
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Obsequio Group on strategic expansion
Legal Update
Mitigating the impact of school data breaches
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Mercia Ventures on £3.9m investment in highways drainage specialist Crown Plus
Legal Update
The ripple effect: How US DEI shifts are impacting UK and Ireland businesses
Legal Update
AI adoption in schools: Meeting ICO expectations
On-Demand
EdCon 2025: Top five takeaways
