Covid-19 vaccine beliefs held to be religious in nature
In Wierowska v HC-One Oval Limited, the Employment Tribunal had to determine whether the Claimant’s beliefs in relation to Covid-19 vaccines amounted to religious beliefs for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010.
In Wierowska v HC-One Oval Limited, the Employment Tribunal had to determine whether the Claimant’s beliefs in relation to Covid-19 vaccines amounted to religious beliefs for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. The Claimant, a Roman Catholic care worker, asserted that one of the reasons for her dismissal was that she refused on religious grounds to take a Covid-19 vaccine. At a preliminary hearing to consider the issue, the Claimant’s beliefs were explored in more detail, including the fact that the Vatican had previously issued a statement to the effect that the vaccines were “morally acceptable”.
The Respondent asserted that the views held by the Claimant were not religious beliefs but rather opinions based on the fact that she was unconvinced by the current evidence available as to the safety (or effects) of the vaccines available. The Employment Judge disagreed, finding that the concerns held by some members of the Catholic community about Covid-19 vaccines were “closely linked to the longstanding Catholic position on abortion and to the resulting opposition to the use of stem cells or foetal material in medical experiments of any sort. They are therefore part and parcel of a fundamental view about the sanctity of human life.” As a result, the Claimant’s views about the vaccine were held to be “intimately connected with her religious faith”, entitling her to rely on that religious faith as a protected characteristic.
It should be of no surprise that certain religious beliefs can affect an individual’s views on vaccination. However, the decision does highlight the difficulties that some employers have faced where asserted beliefs do not appear to align with the orthodox principles of that religion, and/or run contrary to scientific evidence available. In this case, the fact that the Vatican had issued a statement taking a contrary stance did not affect the finding that the Claimant’s beliefs still amounted to religious beliefs. And the Claimant’s resistance to scientific evidence and “stubbornness” was taken by the Tribunal to support the strength of the Claimant’s beliefs.
Contact
Mark Hickson
Head of Business Development
onlineteaminbox@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)370 270 6000
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
School leaders survey Spring 2024 - the results are in
Legal Update
OFS Consultation on freedom of speech guidance
Opinion
Can teachers personal and political views amount to misconduct?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson to advise East London Waste Authority on major waste programme
Legal Update
Government updates guidance on holiday rules: What employers need to know
Legal Update
Holiday pay: Government change clarifies treatment of term time only workers
Legal Update
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
Legal Update
Employment Healthcare Briefing - March 2024
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Greater Manchester Combined Authority on its investment in Beryl
Legal Update
The importance of including temporary staff in NHS patient safety investigations
Opinion
School attendance matters
Opinion
Government’s Spring Budget invests millions in maternity safety
Opinion
Caregivers at work: Navigating new carer's leave regulations
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Sexual safety in the workplace — how leaders can help to create a sexual safety culture
Opinion
EHRC publishes new guidance on menopause and the workplace
Opinion
Fire and re-hire: Updated statutory code summary for employers
Legal Update
Mental health law round up – February 2024
In Person Event
Optimus: HR update and people strategy
Legal Update - Maternity services
Chesterfield Royal Hospital ranked amongst the top Trusts nationally in the 2023 Maternity Survey
Legal Update
How do holiday pay reforms affect the education sector?
Legal Update
Revised Acas Code of Practice on requests for flexible working
Legal Update
Veganism and manufacturing: Protected characteristics from discrimination in employment law
Opinion
Settlement agreements: Court of Session finds future claims may be settled
Legal Update
Holiday reforms: What employers need to know
Legal Update
Employment law in 2024: How changes impact education
Legal Update
Backpay for leavers: Employers risk unlawful deduction from wages claims
Opinion
New employment rights set to come into force
Legal Update
Minimum Service Levels introduced for ambulance, rail, and border security
Opinion
BBC personality wins appeal on IR35 status
Legal Update
School staff pay – how are academies responding to national recommendations?
Legal Update
Employment Healthcare Briefing - December 2023
Opinion
Autumn statement 2023 – key take outs for employers
Opinion
Collective bargaining rights
Legal Update
Failure to prevent fraud: how can my organisation prepare?
Opinion
Agency cover and strike action
Opinion
Overcoming barriers: Building leadership resilience in MATs
Opinion
Updates in equality – An overview of new regulations
Opinion
Minimum Service Levels and reasonable steps – consultation response
Legal Update
Holiday entitlement and pay: Reforms ahead
