Checklist when preparing for remote participation in an inquest hearing
Lockdown restrictions in March 2020 led to many inquest hearings being postponed. As restrictions eased, Coroners came under increasing pressure to reduce the number of delayed inquest hearings. In June 2020, the Chief Coroner issued Guidance No. 38 to facilitate remote participation in coroner’s inquests.
Lockdown restrictions imposed in March 2020 led to many inquest hearings being postponed. As these restrictions eased, Coroners came under increasing pressure to reduce the number of delayed inquest hearings, hold a greater number of inquests to clear the backlog, and ensure that these hearings are conducted safely. To that end, in June 2020, the Chief Coroner issued Guidance No. 38 to facilitate remote participation in coroner’s inquests.
The Guidance requires that the Coroner must be physically present in court throughout the inquest hearing, but in order to manage the impact of the pandemic on court proceedings it is permissible for some or all of the participants in an inquest to access the hearing remotely. This may include Interested Persons (IP) and their legal representatives, witnesses, family members and the media.
The Coroners (Inquest) Rules 2013 at Rule 17(2) makes specific provision for witnesses to give live evidence via video-link where to do so 'would improve the quality of the evidence given by the witness or allow the inquest to proceed more expediently’. It is the Chief Coroner’s view that the pandemic has increased the need to use technology to facilitate remote participation in hearings and that “partially remote hearings should take place wherever possible if the technology allows, it is in the interests of justice and their use is consistent with the administration of justice”.
To satisfy the principles of open justice, the courtroom as far as possible should remain accessible to professional participants, interested persons, witnesses and in particular must be open for the public and the press even if remote participation is taking place during a particular hearing. There may be restrictions on how many people can safely attend the court and most Coroners are asking IPs to confirm in advance of the inquest how many people will be physically in attendance at court.
The decision to hold a remote hearing
Guidance No. 38 expressly states that remote hearings will not be used for jury inquests, “except in exceptional and limited circumstances”.
A Coroner can order a remote hearing. Prior to this order being made, all those individuals and organisations affected should be given the opportunity to make representations and the Coroner will need to consider these alongside an ‘interests of justice’ test. If the family object to an inquest being dealt with remotely it is likely that the Coroner will revert to a face to face inquest hearing, albeit that this may result in a delay in the inquest being heard.
If the Coroner does not order remote participation, any participant can apply to take part in the proceedings remotely. Again, the Coroner will consider this alongside an ‘interests of justice’ test and so if you make such an application this should seek to demonstrate that remote participation:
- 'Would improve the quality of the evidence given by the witness or allow the inquest to proceed more expediently’” (Rule 17(2)); or
- Is in the interests of justice and consistent with the administration of justice (Guidance No. 38).
Preparing for and dealing with a remote hearing
Coroners have worked hard to set up the technology to facilitate remote participation in inquests and are now beginning to work through the backlog of inquests that built up during the early stages of the pandemic. This is a new medium and the checklist below sets out some tips to help you deal with remote participation effectively and professionally:
Contact

Nicola Evans
Partner
Nicola.Evans@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 2962
Discover more
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Automatic suspension and procurement law
Opinion
Plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce approved by government
Opinion
Increase to 20 hour limit on supplementary employment for Health and Care Worker visa holders
Legal Update
Supreme Court will hear Worcestershire case on local authority responsibility for Section 117 Aftercare in April 2023
Published Article
Thinking outside the box
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Implementing learning from claims to help improve patient safety
Legal Update
Cauda Equina Syndrome and application of the new GIRFT pathway
Opinion - Maternity services
University Hospital Leicester hold their inaugural Maternity Safety Conference
Opinion
Junior doctors vote unanimously in favour of strike action
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Published Article
Digital Twin Technologies: key legal contractual considerations
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners’ Question Time
On-Demand
Future of Care - Retirement Living webinar
Press Release - Careers
Browne Jacobson health lawyer wins major accolade at Made in Manchester Awards
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
Legal Update
Green Leases for the NHS
On-Demand
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) in the context of retirement living
Guide
Government response to the consultation on the Higher-Risk Buildings Regulations
Published Article
The first 100 days for Integrated Care Boards
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Press Release - Maternity services
Father Christmas comes to University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire care of Browne Jacobson’s Birmingham Office Community Action Group
Opinion - Maternity services
The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) and its impact on maternity services
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Opinion
Coroner’s refusal to issue a Prevention of Future Deaths Report following death in prison custody inquest was lawful
Article
Mental health, eating disorders and placement of young people
Legal Update
LPS consultation and ‘go live’ planning
Opinion
Consultation launched on plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce
Legal Update
Getting ready to face Industrial Action
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Prolonged disorders of consciousness
Online Event
Mock Inquest Training Sessions
Published Article
How AI and technology can transform the healthcare sector
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
On-Demand
Insights from the Chief Coroner by His Honour Judge Thomas Teague, KC
Opinion
BMA advises consultants not to accept less than the BMA minimum rate card for extra-contractual work
The BMA is advising all NHS / HSCNI consultants to ensure extra-contractual work is paid at the BMA minimum recommended rate and to decline offers of extra-contractual work that doesn't value them appropriately.