Care home worker fairly dismissed for refusing Covid-19 vaccination
The Tribunal considered whether a care home worker was unfairly dismissed following her refusal to be vaccinated against Covid-19. It is important to note the Claimant’s dismissal pre-dated the compulsory vaccination regulations in force from November 2021.
In Allette v Scarsdale Grange Nursing Home Limited, the Tribunal considered whether a care home worker was unfairly dismissed following her refusal to be vaccinated against Covid-19. It is important to note the Claimant’s dismissal pre-dated the compulsory vaccination regulations in force from November 2021.
The Claimant was dismissed on the grounds that she had unreasonably refused to follow management instructions to get vaccinated in January 2021. The Claimant asserted her beliefs against the safety of the vaccine and that it would be against her Rastafarian beliefs to take non-natural medication. The Tribunal considered claims for wrongful and unfair dismissal.
The Tribunal found the Respondent had a legitimate aim when instructing employees to get vaccinated and for dismissing the Claimant who refused to comply, namely to protect the health and safety of residents, staff and visitors. The Tribunal found that although there was interference with the Claimant’s Article 8 Convention right (right to respect for her private life) in requiring her to have the vaccine, this was justified in the circumstances as the particular circumstances of this care home meant that the Article 8 rights of the residents and other staff and visitors were unjustly interfered with by the presence of the Claimant. The Respondent acted within the range of reasonable responses and dismissal was proportionate.
In relation to wrongful dismissal, the Tribunal found the Claimant’s fear and scepticism was an unsubstantiated belief, rather than a religious belief, and as she knew her actions represented a risk to others this was gross misconduct.
The decision is only first instance and is not binding, although it is a useful first look at how tribunals may deal with claims related to compulsory vaccination (including within employers where there is no legal mandate) and, in particular, the relevance of Convention rights.
.jpg?variant=HeroImageTabletVariantDefinition)
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill: Competitive flexible procedure, how will this work in practice?
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill - Are they still playing ping-pong?
Online Event
Data Shared Insights: Information sharing – why, when, how?
Published Article
InLaw: the start of the EPR convergence journey
Legal Update
ICO consultation on fertility tracking apps
Online Event - Shared Insights
Shared Insights with Irwin Mitchell: Improving communication with patients and families
Legal Update
World Patient Safety Day – Engaging patient for patient safety
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Act 2023: Getting Ready for Reform - the countdown is on!
Legal Update
Personal injury discount rate in England and Wales
Opinion
Parental alienation a tool for domestic abuse?
Legal Update
Work experience placements – commendable: have them, and be alive to the risk
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Virgin Money on refinancing of complex care provider Cornerstone Healthcare Group
Opinion
New framework to support flexible working in the NHS
Legal Update
Jurisdiction of the First-tier Mental Health Tribunal in the context of remote assessments under the Mental Health Act: recent developments
Opinion
Modern slavery in the care sector – how employers can manage risks
Opinion
What’s lurking in your garden? The UK’s most dangerous and invasive plants
Opinion
Landowner fined £15,000 after public attacked by cows
Legal Update
Improving patient safety incident and complaint responses to rebuild broken trust
Legal Update
MHPS disciplinary processes: Dr’s application for interim injunction refused
Opinion
£600m funding unveiled to boost social care workforce
Press Release
Browne Jacobson announces appointment of Barrister to its Cardiff office
Legal Update
The future of autonomous technology - August 2023
Legal Update
Polluters to face unlimited penalties under new legislation
Legal Update
Part 36 combined offers – when are they beaten?
Legal Update
Section 117 after-care services – who should pay?
Published Article
Investing in healthcare in Saudi Arabia under the new regulatory framework
Opinion
Government response to Pregnancy Loss Review recommends actions for NHS Employers
Legal Update - Maternity services
The NHS Long Term Workforce Plan 2023
Legal Update
Browne Jacobson grows Cardiff team with two new appointments
Press Release
Browne Jacobson successfully defend vicarious liability claim appeal in connected person foster care case
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroner’s Question Time
Opinion
Further consultants strike announced following government pay offer
Legal Update
Advising on alternative treatments for patients – what is the legal test to be applied?
Opinion
EU standstill provisions maintained allowing the NHS to retain and employ healthcare workers
Published Article
Digital channels and healthcare apps – the UK’s regulatory landscape, challenges for stakeholders and risk of clinical liabilities
Legal Update
Inquests and Article 2 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) A practical guide following the case of Maguire
Legal Update
Learning from Reports to Prevent Future Deaths in Mental Health settings - A Review of PFDs nationally 2022-2023
Opinion
NHS Long Term Workforce Plan unveiled
Opinion
Further NHS strike action announced although nurses dispute now at an end
