How clear are your policy wordings?
The University of Nottingham, in collaboration with Browne Jacobson, has undertaken a detailed academic study into the readability of insurance policies, with some fascinating results.
The University of Nottingham, in collaboration with Browne Jacobson, has undertaken a detailed academic study into the readability of insurance policies, with some fascinating results.
The main findings from the study are that:
- all policies reviewed required education to at least A-level (and in most cases graduate or postgraduate level) in order to be meaningfully understood;
- policyholders routinely find it difficult to understand what is and what is not covered, when given real-life scenarios (comprehension ranged from between 32% and 66%);
- the least-readable policy that was tested could only be meaningfully understood by 13.4% of the UK adult population.
The study firmly indicates that the high reading age (the estimate of number of years of formal education required to understand a text) of the policies has a material impact upon a policyholder’s understanding of the cover.
However, the study also revealed that by applying the drafting methodologies summarised in this report, it is possible to significantly improve the readability of policy wordings and to improve comprehension. For example, it was possible to reduce the reading age of one policy by 10 years from doctorate level to that of a Year 8 pupil (i.e. a 12-to 13-year-old). This increased the estimated percentage of the UK population that could understand the policy by some 75%, from 13.4% to 89% (an increase of 40.4 million people).
Overall, the study shows that much can be done to improve the readability of policy wordings, and that there are significant benefits for those insurers that do so. It will be interesting to see how the market responds to increased knowledge about how individuals read and understand policy wordings.
To view details of the full study, please click below:
Contact
Tim Johnson
Partner
tim.johnson@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 976 6557
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
CyberCube’s Global Threat Outlook: The evolving threat of cyber operations
Legal Update
A new digital safe space – How does the EU Digital Services Act affect insurers?
Legal Update
Extreme weather leading to a rise in property claims
Legal Update
Death and disgrace policies: What can insurers learn from the allegations against Russell Brand?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson solicitor becomes first in private practice to be awarded Plain Numbers accreditation
Press Release
First independent research focused on transforming EDI practices in UK insurance
Guide
Transforming EDI practices in UK insurance
Opinion
Vicarious liability of amateur sports teams for player on player injuries
Legal Update
The recent judgment in MacPhail v Allianz Insurance Plc
Legal Update
Insurance considerations of RAAC failures - air bubbles belong in chocolate, not concrete!
Legal Update
“TOBA traps” - general exposure risk under existing TOBAs
Legal Update
Making numbers easy - complying with the Customer Understanding objective
Legal Update
The RAAC crisis: Is it really back-to-school this September?
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, September 2023
Legal Update
The Word, August 2023
Legal Update
London Market Snippets: An eye on what the Insurance market needs to know (Summer 2023)
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, July 2023
Published Article
Three peaks of consumer protection: Part two — intolerable harm
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Apiary Capital on significant investment in Carbon Underwriting
Legal Update
Harnessing the potential of knowledge exchange, research and innovation
Legal Update
Insolvency practitioners and trustee immunity
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, June 2023
Legal Update
A ‘slick’ result for Shell: the Supreme Court considers limitation in Jalla v Shell
Published Article
The three peaks of customer protection: How ‘operational resilience’ enables compliance with the ‘Consumer Duty’ and ‘Vulnerable Customers’
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, May 2023
Legal Update
Legal professionals: Duty, scope, and limits to both – context is key
Legal Update
AI modelling biases in quote engines
Legal Update
Vicarious liability – don’t overlook the importance of close connection
Legal Update
Parties are in hot water over hot works dispute: proceedings issued in Britannia Hotels (No.2) v Aviva Insurance Limited
Legal Update
The perfect financial storm: top 5 trends making a mischief with BI adjustments
Legal Update
COVID-19 BI Claims rumble on
Legal Update
The risk of encroachment is not a nuisance: Davies v Bridgend County Council
Legal Update
Visual intrusion is oppressive: Fearn v Tate Gallery
Legal Update
Proximate cause focus: Brian Leighton Garages v Allianz and Allianz v University of Exeter
Legal Update
Perils - May 2023
Legal Update
Canadian court rules on whether COVID-19 amounts to physical damage
Legal Update
Subrogation and ‘co-insureds’
Legal Update
Australian courts issue a ‘common sense’ judgment on a rainfall exclusion
Legal Update
Beware of broad exclusion – Cronos v Generali
