logo-education
0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

summer 2020 examination results – managing student/parental concerns

26 August 2020

Please note: the information contained in this legal update is correct as of the original date of publication.

Following the A-Level and GCSE results being based on centre assessed grades (CAGs) and made available to students, Ofqual updated its guidance on appeals and concerns about malpractice. This guidance makes it clear that schools will continue to have a role to play in dealing with concerns after results day and must have procedures in place for this purpose.

The guidance from Ofqual can be found here. The guidance states that concerns may be raised, and action may be taken, in 3 circumstances:

  • Where the academy has made an administrative error in submitting the information to the exam board;
  • Where the exam board has made an error in communicating the information to a student; or
  • Where a student feels that bias, discrimination, malpractice or maladministration has occurred within the academy and that has had a detrimental impact on the centre assessed grade submitted by the school.

The first two issues may result in a school making an appeal on the student’s behalf to the exam board. The final issue represents an allegation of malpractice against the school which would generally need to be investigated by the school through its complaints procedure before any individual referral was made to the exam board. However, individuals may refer malpractice allegations to the exam board at any time.

Our experience shows that concerns are being raised with schools about CAGs at the current time, but there is limited information available on the approach schools should take. Our view is that schools should publish information on their approach to CAG related concerns and that the content of the procedure should include the following issues:

  • Given that it may not be clear what the precise nature of the concern about the CAG is, it may be useful to have a single point of contact within the school to deal with enquiries about CAGs and provide a triage service to determine which is the likely pathway for the concern to be answered.
  • Any initial acknowledgement of the concern should signpost the Ofqual guidance around appeals as it provides greater clarity for students/parents on the scope of the appeal arrangements.
  • A number of concerns may relate to how CAGs were determined. It would appear appropriate for school to publish a general guide explaining how they determined CAGs as this will provide clarity and hopefully reduce the number of concerns.
  • In terms of administrative error, schools will need a process to respond to concerns and provide an internal review (after an initial response) to those concerns where the school does not have sufficient evidence to show that any error has occurred and therefore the school does not need to submit an appeal to the exam body. Administrative errors may be those made by the school or the exam body and would require an appeal to be submitted before 17 September 2020. In accordance with the guidance, schools will need to establish a two stage process which allows (1) an initial consideration of the concern and assessment of whether any error occurred and (2) an internal review of that decision by a person other than the one that undertook the process set out in (1).
  • In terms of maladministration (including bias, discrimination and malpractice), the clear advice from Ofqual is for concerns/complaints to be raised through the school complaints policy. It would be appropriate to deal with these as formal complaints being considered by the Headteacher/Principal at the relevant stage of the school’s complaint procedures. These could go on to be considered by governors/trustees through the appeal stages of the policy before being considered by the exam boards.

If you need specific advice on the procedures to be adopted or in relation to any concerns raised with the school, please contact Richard or other members of the education team.

Coronavirus support

We are helping across business, health, education and government sectors:

training and events

12Mar

ASCL Annual Conference Online

Come and meet the team at ASCL’s annual conference.

View event

24Mar

Optimus MAT Summit Hilton Birmingham Metropole Hotel, The NEC Birmingham, Pendigo Way, Birmingham, B40 1PP

Come and meet the team at Optimus’ annual conference.

View event

focus on...

Legal updates

World Mental Health Day - 10 October 2020

With World Mental Health Day coming up tomorrow, and with the backdrop of COVID-19 dominating most of our thoughts and everyday lives, now is a great opportunity to start thinking about going the extra mile to support the wellbeing of your staff and pupils.

View

Effective Board and Members meetings; Covid-19 and beyond

View our on-demand video where Education Partners Nick MacKenzie and Dominic Swift discuss the approach to members and board meetings in the ‘new normal’ considering the benefits of virtual meetings and discuss how in the longer-term, boards might combine virtual and in-person meetings to be more effective.

View

Guides

Executive pay setting in school trusts

For many years now the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) have written to academy Chairs asking for justification and rationale on executive pay. School trusts have reached out to us for advice to help them meet their obligations within the Academies Financial Handbook.

View

150th Anniversary of State Education – Lessons Learned: reflections of 12 former Secretaries of State

Our on-demand video was hosted by the BBC’s Education Correspondent Branwen Jefferys with special guests including Baroness Nicky Morgan, Kenneth Clarke QC, Michael Gove, Justine Greening and Lord David Blunkett discussing past successes of education, the unintended consequences of past policy, and to envision what still remains to be done.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up