Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
Are you sure you want to remove this item from you pinned content?
A recent High Court decision has confirmed that the use of funding bands to allocate funding to children with Education Health & Care Plans is not unlawful and is sufficient to meet the duties placed on local authorities to secure special educational provision set out in such a plan. The challenge was brought by a number of families within Hackney local authority area and they challenged banding as well as 5% reductions in the amounts of funding within the bands. The judge stated that that banding was acceptable and referenced by the DfE as one method of allocating top-up funding to a child. The key point was that the local authority must ensure that the funding is sufficient to make the provision required for the individual child and in this case given the availability of additional funding on request, the banding system was lawful.
The wider decision supports local authorities on two fronts – it provides some protection against claims based on welfare or equality considerations by adopting a common sense approach to interpretation of the review provisions of the 2014 Act. It also permits the use of bands or matrices to allocate funding – however this will be subject to the funding being sufficient to secure the required provision. This latter point may well continue to be a source of conflict between local authorities, parents and schools.
The recent case of R (on the application of A Parent) v Governing Body of XYZ School [2022] EWHC 1146 (Admin) provides some welcome and reassuring guidance to governing boards on the exclusion reconsideration process.
View blog
With 19 HR experts now supporting over 500 schools and trusts across the country, in this edition of 60 seconds we sit down with Emma Hughes, who leads the team, to discuss what this significant milestone means to her.
In order to reduce the risk of potential breaches, schools should follow this Health and Safety Executive guidance.
A ResPublica report highlighted that asbestos continues to be the UK’s number one occupational killer, with nurses and teachers 3 to 5 times more likely to develop mesothelioma than the general UK population. The House of Commons Work & Pensions Select Committee is investigating how the HSE manages the continued presence of asbestos in buildings.
Partner
Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.
Sign up