There is much still to learn about how the strategy will be implemented and those details will play a huge part in determining the final outcome. However, there are grounds for optimism.
At a recent event, we asked leaders of health and care businesses what each would like to change most over the next year. The most common answer was not funding or workforce-related, but was a hope for a more consistent, collaborative regulator that truly understood their businesses.
With the CQC having launched its new strategy in June, will that hope be fulfilled? The truth is, we don’t know. There is much still to learn about how the strategy will be implemented and those details will play a huge part in determining the final outcome. However, there are grounds for optimism.
One of the key changes in the strategy is the move away from reliance only on set-piece inspections to regulate and rate providers. Inspections will still occur, but generally in response to concerns. A broader range of data will be collected from services and more regularly, allowing ratings to change more responsively. This also has the potential to reduce the inconsistencies that can arise from over-reliance on the view of a lead inspector on a single day.
Where inspections are carried out, generally in response to concerns, providers should expect that they will be challenging and prepare accordingly. It is often said that a CQC inspector’s first impression can set the stage for a whole inspection process. Increasingly, that first impression will have been formed before the inspection even commences as most inspections will be prompted by identified risks.
The CQC is talking about changing its relationship with providers, being more accessible and transparent. Understanding those it regulates better. Setting clearer expectations and benchmarks. Providing advice or signposting to reliable sources of guidance as part of meaningful engagement.
If realised, that ambition could be revolutionary for the sector. The development of mutual respect, trust and transparency has the potential to encourage innovation and investment. Providers should certainly seek to engage with their local inspectors.
The CQC as a leader in the sector, including in its new role regulating Integrated Care Systems could play a vital role in sharing best practice and ensuring local systems work more effectively.
The CQC’s new ‘core ambitions’ are ‘Assessing local systems’ and ‘Tackling inequalities in health and care’. This emphasises how much they are aiming to move beyond just provider-by-provider regulation to play a role in making the whole health and care system work better and work for everyone. Much of this will come from the powers due to be bestowed on CQC in the Health and Social Care Bill. This should be welcomed by those who have said that CQC’s decisions over recent years have demonstrated a lack of a ‘big picture’ view.
Crucially the CQC acknowledges the need to recruit and upskill its own staff and to invest in technology as well as working with stakeholders to fundamentally change how it collects data and service user experiences.
Of course, there are risks for providers. There is reason to be wary of the CQC’s drive to publish more data about services, including action plans agreed following difficult inspections, given the potential effect on their reputations. The CQC has a history of prioritising timely publication over providing an effective route to challenge.
Clearer expectations and benchmarking, absent the time and expertise to fully understand specialist and innovative models of care, can lead to a one-size-fits-all approach that stifles innovation. We have seen previous examples of CQC insisting on rigid compliance with certain guidelines, even when clinical practice has developed alternatives.
Providers will need to adapt to data-led regulation, ensuring that they are equipped to and proactive in providing and analysing required data. It will be vital to provide data in a way consistent with similar providers, to avoid appearing as an outlier. Where data does suggest a concern, providers will need to identify this proactively and be able to provide an explanation and action plan. There is a risk that the regular provision of data will become burdensome and this will need to be factored in to resource-planning.
Continual, meaningful engagement with service users will be even more important than ever as otherwise the CQC will be reliant on feedback they collect themselves, which may be less balanced.
There will be many changes to come in how the CQC operates. It is due to start with development of a new inspection and rating framework over the next year or less. A new scope of registration document may need to follow, as will new expectations on the provision of data and collection of service user feedback.
Providers that are to thrive under the new system will respond quickly to these changes, understanding how they feed into to the CQC’s thinking and how they can adapt to ensure the best result for their services.
This article was first published by National Health Executive
Partner
carl.may-smith@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 934 2024
The BMA is advising all NHS / HSCNI consultants to ensure extra-contractual work is paid at the BMA minimum recommended rate and to decline offers of extra-contractual work that doesn't value them appropriately.
In ‘failure to remove’ claims, the claimant alleges abuse in the family home and asserts that the local authority should have known about the abuse and/or that they should have removed the claimant from the family home and into care earlier.
Logistics company Eddie Stobart has been fined £133,000, after a series of failures which took place whilst excavation work was carried out, exposing its staff to asbestos.
This article is the second in a series to help firms take a practical approach to complying with the ‘cross-cutting rules’ within the new ‘Consumer Duty’ (CD) framework. The article summarises what it seems the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is seeking to achieve from the applicable rules (section 2 below) and potential complications arising from legal considerations (section 3).
Two directors of a construction company were fined after failing to ensure the safe removal of asbestos from a plot of land. On 14 and 15 November 2021, Directors Anthony Sumner and Neil Brown, of Waterbarn Limited were involved in the uncontrolled removal of asbestos material from a plot of land in Grasscroft, Oldham.
An engineering company in Tyne and Wear was fined £20,000 after a worker fractured his pelvis and suffered internal injuries after falling through a petrol station forecourt canopy, whilst he was replacing the guttering.
The Digital Services Act (the “DSA”) has today (27 October) been given the go-ahead by the EU Council and will enter into force by early 2024.
NHS England has published (October 2022) new guidance - Assuring and supporting complex change: Statutory transactions, including mergers and acquisitions.
NHS England has issued an updated (publication 11 October 2022) suite of Complex Change guidance about how it will assure and support proposals for complex change that are reportable to it. New and (where it is still in force) existing Complex Change guidance are as follows.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
It is clear that the digital landscape, often termed cyberspace, is a man-made environment, in which human behaviour dominates and where technology both influences and aids our role in it — through the internet, telecoms and networked computer systems, which are often interdependent. The extent to which any organisation is potentially vulnerable to cyber-attack depends on how well these elements are aligned.
In Mogane v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether it was fair to dismiss a nurse as redundant on the basis that that her fixed-term contract was due to expire before that of her colleague.
Three months on from the commencement of the new statutory Integrated Care Systems (ICS) Anja Beriro and Gerrard Hanratty reflect on the main themes and issues that have come from the new relationship between local government and health.
