Hertfordshire County Council v AB [2018] EWHC 3103 (Fam)
This case considered whether the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction can be used to authorise a deprivation of liberty of a patient with capacity who is subject to a conditional discharge under the Mental Health Act 1983.
This case considered whether the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction can be used to authorise a deprivation of liberty of a patient with capacity who is subject to a conditional discharge under the Mental Health Act 1983.
AB was a 28 year old man who was subject to a s.37/41 restriction order under the Mental Health Act 1983 following convictions for two counts of rape and one count of sexual assault of a child. AB had an assessed IQ of 71, which amounted to a mild learning disability.
AB was conditionally discharged from hospital in June 2016 by the First-tier Tribunal which included a requirement to comply with his care and risk management plan. It was clear that AB had the capacity to understand and consent to his care, support and accommodation arrangements, despite his diagnosis of a mild learning disability. Since his discharge AB’s compliance with his care and treatment had been good. As part of his care plan AB was supervised at all times across a twenty-four hour period including when he was visiting his family. AB consented to these conditions in 2016 and continued to do so. He understood that if he did not adhere to his care and risk management plan it would be likely that he would be recalled to hospital very quickly.
In light of the recent Supreme Court judgment in Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) v MM (Appellant) [2018] UKSC 60 (which held that Mental Health Act 1983 does not permit either the First Tier Mental Health Tribunal or the Secretary of State to impose conditions amounting to detention or a deprivation of liberty upon a conditionally discharged restricted patient), the Local Authority applied to the High Court seeking an order under its inherent jurisdiction to authorise the deprivation of AB’s liberty. They relied on the case of Re SA (Vulnerable Adult with Capacity: Marriage) [2006] 1 FLR 867 (quoted approvingly by the Court of Appeal in DL v. A Local Authority [2012] EWCA Civ 253, [2013] Fam 1) which stated that the inherent jurisdiction extends to a wider class of vulnerable adults than just those who lack capacity, extending to other vulnerable adults who, even if not incapacitated by mental disorder or mental illness, is, or is reasonably believed to be, either
(i) under constraint or
(ii) subject to coercion or undue influence or
(iii) for some other reason deprived of the capacity to make the relevant decision, or disabled from making a free choice, or incapacitated or disabled from giving or expressing a real and genuine consent.
In the case of AB the court was satisfied that AB was a vulnerable adult to whom the inherent jurisdiction may be applied but did not consider that he fell into any of the three categories above.
The Local Authority also submitted that the inherent jurisdiction could be extended to cover the circumstances of AB’s case, based on the applicable principles expressed in the case of Anderson v Spencer [2018] EWCA Civ 100, [2018] 2 FLR 547. In that decision, the Court of Appeal held that the inherent jurisdiction could be extended in the particular circumstances of that case where there was a ‘legislative void’. In the case of MB it was argued that firstly, it was clear that there was no legislative provision governing this situation in that the Mental Health Act provided no remedy; secondly, that it was in the interests of justice; and, thirdly, that there were sound and strong public policy justifications.
The court accepted the arguments advanced by the Local Authority in respect of the extension of the inherent jurisdiction to encompass the particular circumstances of AB’s case. Considering very carefully in the round all the circumstances of this case together with the law, the court was persuaded to give an order under the inherent jurisdiction authorising the deprivation of liberty which arose from the terms of AB’s community care plan to run alongside the conditional discharge.
Mrs Justice Gwyneth Knowles also commented:
“It may well be that my decision is inevitably of short life, but I am persuaded by the Court of Appeal’s suggestion made in paragraph 33 of MM that recourse might properly be had to the exercise of the High Court’s powers as a means of providing lawful authorisation for conditions of discharge amounting to a deprivation of liberty for a capacitous patient such as AB”
Comment
This judgment for now provides a potential vehicle to effect the conditional discharge of restricted patients into the community who require continuous supervision and control that amounts to an objective DoL where the patient has capacity.
However this is a first instance case so may be overturned by higher courts in due course.
This judgment was handed down on 14 December 2018. The judgment can be accessed at the following link: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2018/3103.html
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Online Event
Mock Inquest Training Sessions
Opinion
Junior doctors vote unanimously in favour of strike action
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
Guide
Government response to the consultation on the Higher-Risk Buildings Regulations
Published Article
The first 100 days for Integrated Care Boards
Legal Update
Safeguarding at scale report published
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Legal Update
LPS consultation and ‘go live’ planning
Published Article
How AI and technology can transform the healthcare sector
On-Demand
Leadership and lessons learnt during the Pandemic by Professor Jonathan Van-Tam
Opinion
NHS England – Updated Transaction Guidance
NHS England has published (October 2022) new guidance - Assuring and supporting complex change: Statutory transactions, including mergers and acquisitions.
Opinion
NHS England – Assuring and supporting complex change
NHS England has issued an updated (publication 11 October 2022) suite of Complex Change guidance about how it will assure and support proposals for complex change that are reportable to it. New and (where it is still in force) existing Complex Change guidance are as follows.
Guide
Highlights from the Health and Care Connect Conference
Legal Update
Health and Care Regulation – The Present and the Future
In this article, we discuss some of the themes we have seen in recent CQC regulation as well as providing an update on the development of their new assessment framework. I will also highlight other key developments in the sector that all providers should be aware of.
On-Demand
ICS Forum webinar series: New rules for service reconfiguration
This on-demand webinar looks at the Secretary of State’s new powers under the Health & Care Act 2022 & impact on current approach for healthcare providers.
On-Demand
ICS Forum webinar series: What’s new for ICSs?
Presented by Gerard Hanratty, this on-demand webinar looks into the key new functions for Integrated Care Systems under the new Health & Care Act 2022. It provides a useful update on what is new, how it may be interpreted and what issues may arise.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners' Question Time
In this session, our speakers discussed fundamentals of disclosure, general points on disclosure & Post-Pandemic, interested Persons & Patient Safety Incident Response, and how we can help & Takeaway Tips.
On-Demand
LPS - it's out - what do you need to know? Part 3: the practicalities of implementation
This on-demand session deals with what we now know so far about the finer detail of the LPS proposals, particularly focussing on the practicalities of implementing the LPS system.Legal Update
Health & Care Matters newsletter - June 2022
Welcome to our latest health newsletter for Summer 2022. We have a packed edition which includes fascinating insights from clients and our own lawyers into the potential impact of the Health and Care Act 2022 and associated DHSC integration policy.
Opinion - Maternity services
The impact of COVID-19 on maternal deaths
HSIB published its report on Maternal deaths during the first wave of COVID-19. The report takes a closer look at the impact that COVID-19 had during the initial period of March to May 2020.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Overview of inquests in relation to deaths in custody
In this session, our speakers discussed gave an overview of inquests in relation to deaths in custody and discussed three key themes; Documentation Provision, Communication, and Decision making. They also discussed Healthcare in a prison setting - manging the unique challenges.
On-Demand
LPS - it's out - what do you need to know? Part 2: the most significant changes
This on-demand session considers some of the most significant changes to the Code.Legal Update
When does the treatment of residents of care homes meet the article 2 and article 3 thresholds?
Residents of care homes are particularly vulnerable members of our society, with higher risks of incidents and fatal injuries, which unfortunately can be as a result of suffering ill-treatment. Courts can be faced with the difficult task of determining whether the treatment amounts to a breach of the individual’s rights.
Opinion
Local Health Systems: Relationships not structures
The Local Government Information Unit’s Local Democracy Research Centre report, there are calls for a reinvigorated role for local government as leaders of local health systems, to develop and strengthen relationships of trust, transparency and cooperation.
On-Demand
LPS - it's out - what do you need to know?' Part 1: Regulations and Code of Practice
This on-demand session deals with what we now know so far about the finer detail of the LPS proposals, particularly focussing on the practicalities of implementing the LPS system.Legal Update - Maternity services
The Ockenden Final Report – a blueprint for safe maternity care from ward to Board
The much anticipated final Ockenden report was published on 30 March 2020. The final report sets out the findings of the review into care provided to 1,486 families, and sets out a blueprint for safe maternity care.
Opinion
LPS - it’s out
The long-awaited draft Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice, including the Liberty Protection Safeguards (“LPS”), has landed.
Legal Update
Health & Care Matters newsletter - February 2022
Welcome to our first health newsletter of 2022.
Legal Update
Themes in health and social care for 2022
2021 saw the combination of two challenges. The first was a general under-supply of workers in the health and care sector. The second involved greatly increased and often unpredictable levels of staff absence, through illness or ‘close contact’ isolation.
Legal Update
Deal activity and market update in health and social care sector
In the last nine months of 2021 we saw a huge amount of activity across all sub-sectors of health and social care.
Legal Update
The Liberty Protection Safeguards: brief update
The Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS) will be used to authorise the proportionate and necessary deprivation of liberty for people aged 16 and above who lack the mental capacity to consent to their care arrangements.
On-Demand
VCOD and healthcare workers – Getting ready to meet the requirement
We invite you to an on-demand webinar looking at the key legal and practical implications for healthcare employers arising from the NHS England VCOD Guidance and actions required in Phase 2 implementation stage.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Preparing for 2022 – the big issues for legal teams across health and social care
We were delighted to be joined by Dr Nigel Sturrock, Regional Medical Director for the Midlands at NHS England and NHS Improvement. He gave an overview of the pressures placed on the NHS by the pandemic, including the impact on urgent and emergency care, elective procedures and staffing.
Published Article
Care Quality Commission Strategy from 2021 – Ground for Optimism but Much Still to Learn
There is much still to learn about how the strategy will be implemented and those details will play a huge part in determining the final outcome. However, there are grounds for optimism.
On-Demand
Care Business Briefing - Deal activity dynamics in the healthcare sector
Join Browne Jacobson and Virgin Money for an on-demand webinar as they discussed their thoughts on the outlook for acquisition activity and funding in the health and care sectors.
Legal Update
Health & Care Matters newsletter - November 2021
Welcome to our Health Newsletter focussing on Sustainability and timed to hit your inbox as we start to consider the outcomes from COP26.
Legal Update
Potential criminal offence for care workers to assist people with mental disorders in securing the services of sex workers
In circumstances where it is subsequently proved that an individual does have such a mental disorder, there is a presumption that their carer either knew or could reasonably have been expected to know of the disorder, unless sufficient evidence is adduced to rebut that presumption.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Quarterly safeguarding forum - challenging families and best interests
In this Shared Insights session, we discuss difficulties faced by professionals when dealing with challenging family members and highlighted the legal frameworks and mechanisms that can be implemented to manage these behaviours in order to protect staff and keep the patient’s best interests at the centre of decision making.