The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) introduced a new offence of failure to prevent fraud, which comes into force on 1 September 2025.
An in-scope organisation is liable for failure to prevent fraud if:
One of its “associated persons” (including employees, agents, and suppliers) commits a specified fraud offence intending to benefit the organisation, directly or indirectly.
Incorporated bodies and partnerships are in scope if they meet two of three criteria:
- More than 250 employees
- More than £36 million turnover
- More than £18 million in total assets.
Guilty organisations face an unlimited fine and debarment from public contracts
Smaller organisations are currently outside scope, but this could change. Out-of-scope organisations might need to enhance their fraud prevention procedures to comply with standards set by larger organisations they do business with.
Some examples
- Mis-selling: A UK salesperson remunerated partly by commission engages in mis-selling. This increases their commission as well as the company’s sales. Because there has been a fraud and the company has benefitted, the company may be prosecuted for failure to prevent fraud.
- Overstating profits: The head of finance in a large company that is looking for investors deliberately overstates its profits. The company could be liable for failure to prevent fraud unless it has reasonable prevention procedures in place. This would be the case, whether or not investment was actually received.
Compliance and best practice
An organisation has a defence if it has reasonable “prevention procedures” in place, even if a fraud occurs. The government has produced guidance to help organisations understand what good practice looks like, and how reasonable prevention procedures should be established.
In-scope organisations must evaluate their current policies and procedures against the guidance, to identify risks and vulnerabilities. If additional controls are necessary, these should be implemented promptly, before the offence comes into force. Organisations outside the current scope who are looking to mitigate fraud risks may also refer to the guidance to enhance their own counter-fraud measures.
How we can help
Our specialists are well placed to support organisations looking to review and improve their fraud prevention procedures. We can assist with:
- The conduct of a risk assessment to determine risks from fraud;
- A review of current systems and controls, including fraud prevention policies and procedures;
- A comparison of those controls with government guidance and development of a gap analysis;
- The development or revision of policies and procedures to mitigate identified risks;
- Due diligence on associated persons, including suppliers. agents, clients, and targets;
- The drafting of appropriate contractual provisions;
- The preparation of fraud prevention training; either face-to-face or online; and
- When fraud is alleged, providing crisis response and ongoing support, including the conduct of privileged investigations and representation during regulatory investigations and proceedings.

Paul Wainwright
Partner
paul.wainwright@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)121 237 4577
Related expertise
You may be interested in
Guide
Failure to prevent fraud: The new law
Legal Update
Addressing insurance fraud: Aviva's response and industry-wide implications
Legal Update
How universities can navigate the new 'failure to prevent fraud' offence
Legal Update
AI is creating fraudulent claims
Legal Update
Carbon fraud prompts insurance response
Legal Update
Romance fraud, online scams and cyber fraud: How banks are now protecting your money
Legal Update
Will the Online Safety Act help reduce Google ad spoofing in insurance?
Legal Update
Court of Appeal upholds decision on professional indemnity policy exclusions in insurer's appeal
Legal Update
The EU AI Act: What does it mean for insurers?
Legal Update
FCA writes to MPs over car insurance premiums. What do increases mean for fraud?
Legal Update
The Home Affairs Committee launched another inquiry into fraud - Stop! Think Fraud
Legal Update
The downfall of Vesttoo: Fraudulent letters of credit
Opinion
New fraud offence to be introduced in the new Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill
Legal Update
Economic crime and cybercrime
It is clear that the digital landscape, often termed cyberspace, is a man-made environment, in which human behaviour dominates and where technology both influences and aids our role in it — through the internet, telecoms and networked computer systems, which are often interdependent. The extent to which any organisation is potentially vulnerable to cyber-attack depends on how well these elements are aligned.
Opinion
Lying on your CV – what can possibly go wrong?
The majority of people do not feel the need to embellish their CV to get that coveted position and move on up the career ladder. Their worthiness and benefit to the hiring organisation are easily demonstrated through the recruitment process – application, psychometric testing, selection day or interview.
Legal Update
Integrated Care Boards and preventing NHS fraud – what you need to know and how to achieve it
On 7 July this year, NHS England published its statutory guidance for Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) and with it set out the ICBs’ role and responsibilities and how they should collaborate, interact and carry out their anti-fraud, bribery and corruption functions in concert with NHS England.
Opinion
Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021
Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.
Legal Update
Contingent loss in negligence claims
Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).
Opinion
SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement
On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.
Press Release
Browne Jacobson successfully advises NHS Resolution on fraud case
In one of the most significant fraud findings for the NHS, Lesley Elder, 51, was handed a 5-month custodial sentence for contempt of court for dishonestly claiming in excess of £2.3 million in compensation.