The CQC has published its State of Care in England report for 2022/23. State of Care is CQC’s annual assessment of health and social care in England. The report looks at the trends, shares examples of good and outstanding care, and highlights where care needs to improve.
In the report, there are sections on:
- The quality of mental health care
- The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)
We have summarised CQC’s key findings in these two areas below.
Quality of mental health care
- Access to mental health care and the quality of the care remain a key area of concern for CQC.
Unavailability of community care continues to put pressure on mental health inpatient services, with many services struggling to provide a bed. In turn, this is leading to people being cared for in inappropriate environments. - There are lengthy waiting lists for treatment. In June 2022, an estimated 1.2 million people were on the waiting list for community-based NHS mental health services. This is despite more funding and increasing staffing levels for mental health services.
- Despite the best efforts of community providers, there are still concerning waits for services for children and young people, which has a significant impact on children and families, and on staff morale
- People are often facing the prospect of being sent far from home for care and treatment. Despite a government commitment to ending out of area placements, as of May 2023, there were 775 out-of-area placements across England.
- Placing people in hospitals far from home and away from friends, family and support networks can affect their recovery.
- CQC considers that the quality of care in mental health hospitals is not good enough, with areas of concern include the use of dormitories and mixed sex wards. The safety of services also continues to be an area of concern.
- Recruitment and retention of staff remains one of the biggest challenges for mental health services, with the use of bank and agency staff higher than ever.
- The use of agency staff puts pressure on permanent staff and increases risk to people using services, as staff do not always know them.
- Warning notices have been issued to providers because of staffing issues, including not having enough registered nurses, poor mandatory training figures and poor records management.
- There are concerns around the use of restrictive practices, due to the trauma service users can experience as a result.
- CQC has developed a new policy position on reducing restrictive practices.
- Whilst CQC recognises that restrictive practices may be appropriate in limited, legally justified and ethically sound circumstances, it is clear that the use of such practices should be rare and could be seen as a failure of care.
- Providers are expected to report on the use of restrictive practices, learn from them and actively work to reduce them.
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)
- The number of applications for a deprivation of liberty (both to the Court of Protection or under DoLS scheme) has increased year-on-year since April 2020 in both adult social care and hospital settings.
- CQC remains concerned that the current DoLS system is unable to cope with the demand for assessments. Ongoing problems with the process, including delays in processing applications and the varied knowledge of staff about the safeguards, have left many people who are in vulnerable circumstances without legal protection for extended periods.
- In 2022/23, the number of applications to deprive a person of their liberty increased to over 300,000 (an increase of 11% from the previous year), with only 19% of standard applications completed within the statutory 21-day timeframe.
- The average application took 156 days – over 7 times the statutory timeframe.
- To tackle these resourcing issues, some local authorities are carrying out remote assessments in cases where there are no concerns. However, the suitability of this type of assessment has been questioned by CQC, especially for people who have conditions such as advanced dementia which may affect communication.
- CQC continues to see that some providers have a limited understanding of the DoLS framework and are not delivering adequate training on DoLS.
- In particular, CQC has seen that staff do not always implement the conditions attached to DoLS authorisations – which providers have an obligation to comply with.
- Poor knowledge and application of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) has affected ratings for some providers and has led to enforcement action.
- There is a variable understanding of the interface between the MCA and the Mental Health Act.
- Mental capacity assessments are often poorly recorded.
- Some staff still make the assumption that people subject to DoLS lack capacity in all areas and are not capable of making any decisions for themselves.
- Lack of understanding of the MCA has led to the overuse of restrictive practices, e.g. installing sensor mats or bed sides are not always viewed as restrictions.
- Some providers do not clearly explain the DoLS system to service users and their families, and do not give sufficient information about their roles and rights.
- This prevents families from being meaningfully involved in the process and unable to properly represent their relatives.
- Delays to the implementation of Liberty Protection Safeguards mean that the existing challenges with the DoLS system will likely continue unless short-to-medium term changes are introduced. CQC is concerned about the impact of these delays for people being deprived of their liberty, for their family and friends, for providers, local authorities and other stakeholders.
So what now?
The new Mental Health Bill may have helped to resolve some of the issues highlighted in mental health care, since the planned reforms were designed in part to reduce the use of detention and community treatment orders (CTOs) and end the detention of autistic people and those with learning disabilities. The Bill was also designed to give patients more choice and greater safeguards were planned for those refusing medication. Sadly, however, no mention was made of the new Mental Health Bill in the King’s Speech on 7 November 2023, meaning there will be no reform of the Mental Health Act any time soon.
The Government has however previously announced that it will be introducing an updated MCA Code of Practice, which CQC hopes will assist in improved understanding of the Act. We will provide further updates on this as and when it is published.
You may be interested in...
Online Event
Mental health and capacity forum
Legal Update
Death certification reform in England and Wales: How will health and social care be affected?
Legal Update
A long period of voluntary child care does not always mean an entitlement to damages
Opinion
Court of Appeal finds there is no requirement for “belief” in the Mental Capacity Act functional test
Legal Update
UK government announces new Mental Health Bill to modernise the Mental Health Act 1983
Legal Update
Labour’s mental health care plans: What to expect under the new government
Press Release
General election reaction from Browne Jacobson’s health and life sciences team
Legal Update
UK election 2024: What are the healthcare promises made by the major political parties?
Legal Update
Government response to the recommendations regarding the draft Mental Health Bill
Legal Update
ICO consultation on accessing care records: A legal perspective
Legal Update
Court of Protection rules on capacity and best interests in pregnancy termination case involving detained woman
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Sexual safety in the workplace — how leaders can help to create a sexual safety culture
Legal Update
Mental health law round up – February 2024
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Giving evidence before the Family Court - a practical session
Legal Update
Updated guidance on COPDOL11 (Re X) applications
Published Article
Legal frameworks for mental health
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
Making a difference: Working in mental health and mental capacity law
Legal Update
Renewals and CTOs - are remote examinations permitted under the Mental Health Act?
Legal Update
CQC State of Care report 2022/23 – what does it say about mental health care and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards?
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared insights: Mental Capacity
Legal Update
Can a care provider be compelled to deliver care that it considers unsafe or is unwilling to provide?
On-Demand - Shared Insights
The challenges caused by disordered eating in education, health and social care settings
Legal Update
Jurisdiction of the First-tier Mental Health Tribunal in the context of remote assessments under the Mental Health Act: recent developments
Legal Update
Section 117 after-care services: Who should pay?
Legal Update
Inquests and Article 2 of the ECHR: A practical guide following the case of Maguire
Legal Update
Learning from Reports to Prevent Future Deaths in Mental Health settings - A Review of PFDs nationally 2022-2023
Legal Update
Navigating the complexities of detention: insights from a recent Mental Health Act / Mental Capacity Act interface case
Legal Update
Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS) update – June 2023
Legal Update
Restricting a patient’s use of their mobile phone – is it lawful?
Legal Update
Supreme Court will hear Worcestershire case on local authority responsibility for Section 117 Aftercare in April 2023
Legal Update
Mental health, eating disorders and placement of young people
Legal Update
LPS consultation and ‘go live’ planning
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Prolonged disorders of consciousness
Legal Update
Liberty Protection Safeguards: points to note as consultation period continues
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards was due to transition to Liberty Protection Safeguards in October 2020 but delayed due to the pandemic. While the public consultation has now closed and we’re still unclear of what the final legislation and code will look like, it’s worth noting and keeping a watching brief.
On-Demand
LPS - it's out - what do you need to know? Part 3: the practicalities of implementation
This on-demand session deals with what we now know so far about the finer detail of the LPS proposals, particularly focussing on the practicalities of implementing the LPS system.Legal Update
The Liberty Protection Safeguards – how can we help?
The Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS) were introduced in the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019 and will replace the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) system. The LPS framework aims to deliver improved outcomes for people who are or who need to be deprived of their liberty.
On-Demand
LPS - it's out - what do you need to know? Part 2: the most significant changes
This on-demand session considers some of the most significant changes to the Code.Legal Update
Liberty Protection Safeguards – It’s out: MCA LPS Consultation
Following on from the first webinar in the Liberty Protection Safeguards (“LPS”) series delivered by Mark Barnett and Chris Stark, the key points below from the webinar are summarised below.
On-Demand
LPS - it's out - what do you need to know?' Part 1: Regulations and Code of Practice
This on-demand session deals with what we now know so far about the finer detail of the LPS proposals, particularly focussing on the practicalities of implementing the LPS system.Opinion
LPS - it’s out
The long-awaited draft Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice, including the Liberty Protection Safeguards (“LPS”), has landed.