The CQC has published its State of Care in England report for 2022/23. State of Care is CQC’s annual assessment of health and social care in England. The report looks at the trends, shares examples of good and outstanding care, and highlights where care needs to improve.
In the report, there are sections on:
- The quality of mental health care
- The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)
We have summarised CQC’s key findings in these two areas below.
Quality of mental health care
- Access to mental health care and the quality of the care remain a key area of concern for CQC.
Unavailability of community care continues to put pressure on mental health inpatient services, with many services struggling to provide a bed. In turn, this is leading to people being cared for in inappropriate environments. - There are lengthy waiting lists for treatment. In June 2022, an estimated 1.2 million people were on the waiting list for community-based NHS mental health services. This is despite more funding and increasing staffing levels for mental health services.
- Despite the best efforts of community providers, there are still concerning waits for services for children and young people, which has a significant impact on children and families, and on staff morale
- People are often facing the prospect of being sent far from home for care and treatment. Despite a government commitment to ending out of area placements, as of May 2023, there were 775 out-of-area placements across England.
- Placing people in hospitals far from home and away from friends, family and support networks can affect their recovery.
- CQC considers that the quality of care in mental health hospitals is not good enough, with areas of concern include the use of dormitories and mixed sex wards. The safety of services also continues to be an area of concern.
- Recruitment and retention of staff remains one of the biggest challenges for mental health services, with the use of bank and agency staff higher than ever.
- The use of agency staff puts pressure on permanent staff and increases risk to people using services, as staff do not always know them.
- Warning notices have been issued to providers because of staffing issues, including not having enough registered nurses, poor mandatory training figures and poor records management.
- There are concerns around the use of restrictive practices, due to the trauma service users can experience as a result.
- CQC has developed a new policy position on reducing restrictive practices.
- Whilst CQC recognises that restrictive practices may be appropriate in limited, legally justified and ethically sound circumstances, it is clear that the use of such practices should be rare and could be seen as a failure of care.
- Providers are expected to report on the use of restrictive practices, learn from them and actively work to reduce them.
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)
- The number of applications for a deprivation of liberty (both to the Court of Protection or under DoLS scheme) has increased year-on-year since April 2020 in both adult social care and hospital settings.
- CQC remains concerned that the current DoLS system is unable to cope with the demand for assessments. Ongoing problems with the process, including delays in processing applications and the varied knowledge of staff about the safeguards, have left many people who are in vulnerable circumstances without legal protection for extended periods.
- In 2022/23, the number of applications to deprive a person of their liberty increased to over 300,000 (an increase of 11% from the previous year), with only 19% of standard applications completed within the statutory 21-day timeframe.
- The average application took 156 days – over 7 times the statutory timeframe.
- To tackle these resourcing issues, some local authorities are carrying out remote assessments in cases where there are no concerns. However, the suitability of this type of assessment has been questioned by CQC, especially for people who have conditions such as advanced dementia which may affect communication.
- CQC continues to see that some providers have a limited understanding of the DoLS framework and are not delivering adequate training on DoLS.
- In particular, CQC has seen that staff do not always implement the conditions attached to DoLS authorisations – which providers have an obligation to comply with.
- Poor knowledge and application of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) has affected ratings for some providers and has led to enforcement action.
- There is a variable understanding of the interface between the MCA and the Mental Health Act.
- Mental capacity assessments are often poorly recorded.
- Some staff still make the assumption that people subject to DoLS lack capacity in all areas and are not capable of making any decisions for themselves.
- Lack of understanding of the MCA has led to the overuse of restrictive practices, e.g. installing sensor mats or bed sides are not always viewed as restrictions.
- Some providers do not clearly explain the DoLS system to service users and their families, and do not give sufficient information about their roles and rights.
- This prevents families from being meaningfully involved in the process and unable to properly represent their relatives.
- Delays to the implementation of Liberty Protection Safeguards mean that the existing challenges with the DoLS system will likely continue unless short-to-medium term changes are introduced. CQC is concerned about the impact of these delays for people being deprived of their liberty, for their family and friends, for providers, local authorities and other stakeholders.
So what now?
The new Mental Health Bill may have helped to resolve some of the issues highlighted in mental health care, since the planned reforms were designed in part to reduce the use of detention and community treatment orders (CTOs) and end the detention of autistic people and those with learning disabilities. The Bill was also designed to give patients more choice and greater safeguards were planned for those refusing medication. Sadly, however, no mention was made of the new Mental Health Bill in the King’s Speech on 7 November 2023, meaning there will be no reform of the Mental Health Act any time soon.
The Government has however previously announced that it will be introducing an updated MCA Code of Practice, which CQC hopes will assist in improved understanding of the Act. We will provide further updates on this as and when it is published.
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Cross-sector collaboration and civic leadership: round table insight
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared insights: The challenges caused by disordered eating in education, health and social care settings
Legal Update
CQC State of Care report 2022/23 – what does it say about mental health care and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards?
Legal Update
Can a care provider be compelled to deliver care that it considers unsafe or is unwilling to provide?
Legal Update
Jurisdiction of the First-tier Mental Health Tribunal in the context of remote assessments under the Mental Health Act: recent developments
Legal Update
Section 117 after-care services – who should pay?
Legal Update
Inquests and Article 2 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) A practical guide following the case of Maguire
Legal Update
Learning from Reports to Prevent Future Deaths in Mental Health settings - A Review of PFDs nationally 2022-2023
Legal Update
Navigating the complexities of detention: insights from a recent Mental Health Act / Mental Capacity Act interface case
Legal Update
Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS) update – June 2023
Legal Update
Restricting a patient’s use of their mobile phone – is it lawful?
Legal Update
Supreme Court will hear Worcestershire case on local authority responsibility for Section 117 Aftercare in April 2023
Article
Mental health, eating disorders and placement of young people
Legal Update
LPS consultation and ‘go live’ planning
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Prolonged disorders of consciousness
Legal Update
Liberty Protection Safeguards: points to note as consultation period continues
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards was due to transition to Liberty Protection Safeguards in October 2020 but delayed due to the pandemic. While the public consultation has now closed and we’re still unclear of what the final legislation and code will look like, it’s worth noting and keeping a watching brief.
On-Demand
LPS - it's out - what do you need to know? Part 3: the practicalities of implementation
This on-demand session deals with what we now know so far about the finer detail of the LPS proposals, particularly focussing on the practicalities of implementing the LPS system.Legal Update
The Liberty Protection Safeguards – how can we help?
The Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS) were introduced in the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019 and will replace the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) system. The LPS framework aims to deliver improved outcomes for people who are or who need to be deprived of their liberty.
On-Demand
LPS - it's out - what do you need to know? Part 2: the most significant changes
This on-demand session considers some of the most significant changes to the Code.Legal Update
Liberty Protection Safeguards – It’s out: MCA LPS Consultation
Following on from the first webinar in the Liberty Protection Safeguards (“LPS”) series delivered by Mark Barnett and Chris Stark, the key points below from the webinar are summarised below.
On-Demand
LPS - it's out - what do you need to know?' Part 1: Regulations and Code of Practice
This on-demand session deals with what we now know so far about the finer detail of the LPS proposals, particularly focussing on the practicalities of implementing the LPS system.Opinion
LPS - it’s out
The long-awaited draft Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice, including the Liberty Protection Safeguards (“LPS”), has landed.
Legal Update
Is a review of Article 2 application in inquests on the horizon?
The Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of Jacqueline Maguire v HM Senior Coroner for Blackpool and Fylde in which the Coroner ruled that Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to life) was not engaged.
Legal Update
Liberty Protection Safeguards: What are they and will they ever happen?
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Mental Health Units (Use of Force) Act: What does it mean for hospitals in the mental health and acute sector?
Our speakers looked at the Mental Health Units (Use of Force) Act and what it means for hospitals in the mental health and acute sector.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Mental Health in Maternity
Our speakers looked at the legal framework for maternal mental health issues, the obstetrician’s perspective & the psychiatrist’s perspective.
Legal Update
The Liberty Protection Safeguards: brief update
The Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS) will be used to authorise the proportionate and necessary deprivation of liberty for people aged 16 and above who lack the mental capacity to consent to their care arrangements.
On-Demand
Mental Health and Court of Protection Legal Update webinar
Watch now on-demand our Mental Health and Court of Protection Legal Update webinar, there have been some interesting recent legal developments in this area and topics that were covered during the session.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Safeguarding Forum - Safe discharge and conveyance of patients
It is important to bear in mind the legal framework when planning discharge and conveyance plans but practicalities are also key.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Mental health patients: learning from incidents and inquests
Our speakers looked at themes arising from inquests, learning from participating in RCAs, the clinician’s perspective and a difficult case study.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: the future of interaction between health and social care
This session discussed the future of interaction between NHS Trusts and local government amidst a drive for better integrated care.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Managing complex patients
Legal Update
Coronavirus – new legislation and guidance relevant to practitioners working with the Mental Health Act and the Mental Capacity Act
We are seeing an unprecedented situation in the Mental Health Act and the Mental Capacity Act, which central Government, the NHS and courts are responding to with speed.
Training
Mental Capacity Act – anticipating loss of capacity
Health lawyer, Chris Stark, provides you with an update on the recent case of United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust v CD [2019] EWCOP 24.
Legal Update
Reminder to NHS Trusts to make Court of Protection applications promptly
The recent case of East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust v PW [2019] EWCOP 673 is an important reminder to NHS Trusts that Court of Protection applications should be made promptly.