Are you a local authority struggling with costly and time-consuming low value disputes? The Court of Appeal appeared to have heard your cries in November last year, after they handed down a judgment which will enable courts to order parties to engage in dispute resolution processes outside of the courtroom before resorting to legal action.
Any type of process that has the potential to resolve a dispute may be the subject of such an order including negotiation, mediation and here’s the best part – your own internal complaints procedure.
The case involved a dispute between Mr Churchill and Merthyr Tydfil County Council over the encroachment of Japanese Knotweed from the Council’s land on to Mr Churchill’s adjoining land. Mr Churchill sent a letter before action to the Council demanding a total of over £92,000 for the cost of removing the Japanese Knotweed, the reduction in value of his property, unlawful interference with his land and his legal costs to date.
The Council denied liability but referred Mr Churchill to their internal corporate complaints procedure through which the Japanese Knotweed could be treated. The Council subsequently instigated stage 1 of that procedure which involved sending contractors to Mr Churchill’s land to remove the Japanese Knotweed. Mr Churchill refused to allow the contractors to enter his land and the Council was never able to conclude their procedure.
Mr Churchill started a legal action against the Council and the Council asked the Court to temporarily suspend the proceedings on the grounds that their internal corporate complaints procedure had not been used. Their application was unsuccessful because previously, Courts could not 'force' parties to engage in dispute resolution processes outside the courtroom; they considered that this would restrict an individual’s right of access to the Court. However, the Council was granted permission to appeal the decision on the basis that they had raised an important point of principle and practice.
Thereafter, it was determined by the Court of Appeal that the Court does in fact have the power to mandate engagement in non-court-based dispute resolution processes. This means that going forward, it is possible for the Court to prevent hypothetical Mr Churchills from issuing proceedings against local authorities before engaging with their internal complaints procedure.
There are no fixed principles for determining when the Court will exercise this power, but regard will be had for the merits or demerits of the particular type of dispute resolution process proposed. Commentators have since noted the inherent bias of an internal complaints procedure which raises issues such as whether the complainant can insist on having a solicitor, among others. The Court itself did not comment on the 'appropriateness' of the Council’s internal corporate complaints procedure but did indicate that fair, efficient and effective processes will be looked upon favourably.
With that said, to increase your chances as a local authority of benefiting from this decision, you may want to consider reviewing your own internal complaints procedures and asking yourself whether it is robust, fair, efficient and effective. By such means, you might be able to avoid the expense of litigation.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
New hope for the manufacturing sector?
Published Article
The Post Office Horizon IT Scandal: How should organisations react when IT systems go wrong?
Legal Update
Changes to the fixed recoverable costs regime
Legal Update
Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil Council: A game changing decision for local authorities
Legal Update
Are amendments to be expected for the Arbitration Act 1996?
Guide
How to manage retail sector supply contracts and avoid disputes
Opinion
Mediation – remote or in person?
Published Article
ClientEarth claim may expand scope of directors' duties
Legal Update
Product distribution – how to protect yourself from an early exit
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - January 2023
Press Release
Court of Appeal makes plea for legally enforceable arbitration for FRAND disputes
In the ongoing complex litigation between Optis Cellular Technology LLC and Apple Inc., the Court of Appeal ([2022] EWCA Civ 1411) has upheld the High Court’s findings that implementers of standard-essential patents (SEPs) cannot refuse to accept a FRAND license and continue activities in the meantime which constitute infringement: that party must commit to accept a court-determined license if it wishes to avoid an injunction.
Opinion
The Future of Mediation
Published Article
Sole director decisions: Another perspective
Opinion
Covid Rent Arrears: Cinema operators’ appeals dismissed
The Court of Appeal has dismissed two cases regarding rent arrears accrued during the Covid lockdowns. The cases are London Trocadero (2015) LLP v Picturehouse Cinemas Ltd and Bank of New York Mellon (International) Ltd v Cine-UK Ltd.
Legal Update
Safeguarding the incorporation of onerous terms into a contract
Useful guidance on the incorporation of onerous terms and conditions into a contract has been provided by HHJ Davies’ judgment in the recent case of Blu-Sky Solutions Ltd v Be Caring Ltd [2021] EWHC 2619 (Comm).
Legal Update
Contract termination in Covid-19 times
The ‘new normal’ has brought with it a variety of different challenges and it has had an impact on nearly all facets of our lives, including the termination of contracts during these Covid-19 times.
Legal Update
REACH Registration post-Brexit
Although the UK’s departure from the EU means that the EU REACH regulation no longer applies, UK REACH has stepped in to fill the gap, and UK-based companies exporting to the EU are now facing two chemicals regulation frameworks to deal with when before there was just one. Is your company ready for the challenge?
Legal Update
Litigators beware! Recent changes to Part 36 Offers
Opinion
Directors who fail to prepare, should prepare to fail
Two recent judgments demonstrate the risk that directors (of insolvent companies) face of being personally liable if appropriate records and procedures are not followed and if it cannot be shown that certain payments were in the interests of the company.
Legal Update
Recent changes to HMRC's policy on VAT and contract termination payments
On 2 September HMRC announced a change in its policy on the VAT treatment of compensation and damages payments in the context of early contract termination.
Opinion
Impact of Covid-19 upon level of fine
Two cases have considered the issue of Covid 19 as part of the sentencing exercise. In the most recent, failures by a principal contractor Modus Workspace, who design and refit refurbishments, led to a £1.1 million fine after an engineer was injured from a fall from a roof.
Legal Update
Whose clause is it anyway?
Since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, the spotlight has increasingly been on force majeure and termination clauses in contracts.
Opinion - Future Lawyer blog
A day in the life of a Commercial Disputes Resolution (CDR) trainee
Ruby O'Hara gives us an insight of her role in the Commercial Disputes Resolution team.
Legal Update
Neocleous and another v Rees [2019] EWHC 2462 (Ch)
Following a dispute over a right of way, the parties’ solicitors agreed in an exchange of emails (constituting a single email chain) to compromise the dispute by the defendant (R) transferring to the claimants (N) a small piece of land adjacent to Lake Windermere.
Legal Update
Stanning v Baldwin and another [2019] EWHC 1350 (Ch)
Issues about prescriptive rights of way and drainage arose on the redevelopment of dominant land.
Opinion
Cyber risks – are businesses really ready?
The Hiscox Cyber Readiness report, a review of 3300 organisations, will be a stark warning for CEO’s of SME’s in the UK and in Europe.