Breach of confidentiality claims
We have seen a rise in recent times in claims resulting from breach of confidentiality. Here we explain how these claims arise and what to do if you become aware of a breach of confidentiality.
We have seen a rise in recent times in claims resulting from breach of confidentiality. Here we explain how these claims arise and what to do if you become aware of a breach of confidentiality.
Health records are subject to a duty of confidentiality as they derive from the relationship between the medical practitioner and patient. All information that, directly or indirectly, might identify a patient and that was created in the context of the provision of healthcare to a patient is subject to this duty. The general legal principle is that such information should not be disclosed to others without the consent of the patient, where it is required by law, or if it is justified in the public interest (such as to prevent serious harm to the patient or others).
Unfortunately, breaches of confidentiality do sometimes occur because health records have been mistakenly disclosed or accessed without proper authorisation. As health records will always contain personal data (and will almost always contain special category data), the most immediate question you need to ask is whether the breach ought to be reported to the Information Commissioner (within 72 hours) and/or the affected individual(s). Depending on the circumstances, you may also consider reporting the matter to the police if a criminal offence has been committed.
If legal proceedings are commenced against you then any claim will usually contain the following heads of claim: (1) breach of confidentiality; (2) statutory breach of the Data Protection Act 2018; and (3) misuse of private information. Ultimately, this is not of much consequence as the courts have tended to simply assess damages as a global figure, often using the Judicial College Guidelines as a reference when the only harm suffered is distress. Although there is a growing body of case law in relation to the assessment of damages, the facts of each case are so disparate that it remains difficult to make any direct comparisons when considering likely damages awards in these claims.
Please contact Matthew Alderton for further help with any breach of confidentiality claims that you may have.
Contact

Matthew Alderton
Senior Associate
matthew.alderton@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 2747
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce approved by government
Opinion
Increase to 20 hour limit on supplementary employment for Health and Care Worker visa holders
Legal Update
Supreme Court will hear Worcestershire case on local authority responsibility for Section 117 Aftercare in April 2023
Published Article
Thinking outside the box
Legal Update
Cauda Equina Syndrome and application of the new GIRFT pathway
Opinion - Maternity services
University Hospital Leicester hold their inaugural Maternity Safety Conference
Opinion
Junior doctors vote unanimously in favour of strike action
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Published Article
Digital Twin Technologies: key legal contractual considerations
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners’ Question Time
On-Demand
Future of Care - Retirement Living webinar
Press Release - Careers
Browne Jacobson health lawyer wins major accolade at Made in Manchester Awards
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
Legal Update
Green Leases for the NHS
On-Demand
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) in the context of retirement living
Guide
Government response to the consultation on the Higher-Risk Buildings Regulations
Published Article
The first 100 days for Integrated Care Boards
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Press Release - Maternity services
Father Christmas comes to University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire care of Browne Jacobson’s Birmingham Office Community Action Group
Opinion - Maternity services
The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) and its impact on maternity services
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Opinion
Coroner’s refusal to issue a Prevention of Future Deaths Report following death in prison custody inquest was lawful
Article
Mental health, eating disorders and placement of young people
Legal Update
LPS consultation and ‘go live’ planning
Opinion
Consultation launched on plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce
Legal Update
Getting ready to face Industrial Action
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Prolonged disorders of consciousness
Online Event
Mock Inquest Training Sessions
Published Article
How AI and technology can transform the healthcare sector
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
On-Demand
Insights from the Chief Coroner by His Honour Judge Thomas Teague, KC
Opinion
BMA advises consultants not to accept less than the BMA minimum rate card for extra-contractual work
The BMA is advising all NHS / HSCNI consultants to ensure extra-contractual work is paid at the BMA minimum recommended rate and to decline offers of extra-contractual work that doesn't value them appropriately.