Every two years, the Cabinet Office is obliged to review the threshold figures contained within: (1) the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011; (2) the Public Contracts Regulations 2015; (3) the Concession Contracts Regulations 2016; and (4) the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016.
This article is taken from November's public matters newsletter. Click here to view more articles from this issue.
Every two years, the Cabinet Office is obliged to review the threshold figures contained within: (1) the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011; (2) the Public Contracts Regulations 2015; (3) the Concession Contracts Regulations 2016; and (4) the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016. The purpose of this review is to ensure that the threshold figures take into account fluctuations in the value of sterling; the existing threshold figures came into force on 1 January 2020.
This is a review which is required by virtue of the UK’s participation in the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement. This agreement between 21 parties (including the US and the EU) seeks to ensure open, fair and transparent conditions of competition in the government procurement market. The practical effect of this agreement is that suppliers from countries party to the agreement are treated equally to domestic suppliers in relation to certain types of procurement opportunities which exceed specified threshold figures.
As these threshold figures determine whether contracts are subject to specific procurement rules, it is critical that, in order to prepare appropriately and continue to meet their legal obligations, contracting authorities are aware of the implications of this biennial review and the amended threshold figures.
The Cabinet Office laid before parliament on 1 November 2021 the Public Procurement (Agreement on Government Procurement) (Thresholds) (Amendment) Regulations 2021 (“the Regulations”), which contains the revised threshold figures that will come into force on 1 January 2022. These revised thresholds will not apply to any procurement which has commenced prior to the Regulations coming into force.
The amendments to existing threshold figures are as follows:
| Regulation | Type of Contract | Existing Figure (calculated excl. of VAT) | New Figure (calculated inc. of VAT) |
| Public Contracts Regulations 2015 | Works contracts | £4,733,252 | £5,336,937 |
| Supply and service contracts awarded by central government | £122,976 | £138,760 | |
| Supply and service contracts awarded by local government | £189,330 | £213,477 | |
| Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016 | Works contracts | £4,733,252 | £5,336,937 |
| Supply and service contract | £378,660 | £426,955 | |
| Concessions Contracts Regulations 2016 | Concession contracts | £4,733,252 | £5,336,937 |
Furthermore, the Regulations also amend the VAT position of threshold figures. The figures contained in the above table are now calculated inclusive of VAT, departing from the previous position whereby figures were calculated net of VAT. Notably, while the figures contained within the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011 and the ‘light touch’ regime threshold figure in the Public Contracts Regulations 2016 have not been updated, this change to the VAT position will apply to these thresholds.
The government is obliged to make this amendment to the calculation of threshold figures as the EU specific methodology for calculating threshold figures exclusive of VAT no longer applies to the UK. As the UK is no longer a member state of the EU, it must now accord with the standard methodology adopted by non-EU members of the Agreement on Government Procurement, which calculates threshold figures inclusive of VAT.
The implications of this VAT change means that there has in real terms been a reduction in value of the threshold figures. As a result, a number of contracts which may have not have otherwise fallen within the scope of the relevant procurements regimes when calculated net of VAT may now be subject to procurement rules. Contracting authorities will therefore need to take this change into account when determining whether anticipated contracts will now be subject to the relevant procurement regime.
The government expects to provide further guidance by publishing a Procurement Policy Note in due course. In light of these amendments and in order to ensure compliance from 1 January 2022, we expect that contracting authorities will consider reviewing and auditing anticipated procurements where the contract value previously fell just outside the threshold figure. We also expect a greater number of procurements to fall within the scope of the procurement regimes due to the effective reduction to the threshold figures.
Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Announced in September but scrapped on 17 November the investment zone proposals were very short lived. The proposal has now morphed into the proposal for a smaller number of clustered zones earmarked for investment.
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
In ‘failure to remove’ claims, the claimant alleges abuse in the family home and asserts that the local authority should have known about the abuse and/or that they should have removed the claimant from the family home and into care earlier.
Across the UK, homelessness is an urgent crisis, and one that is set to grow amid the rising cost of living. Local authorities are at the forefront of responding to this crisis, but with a lack of properties that are suitable for social housing across the UK, vulnerable individuals and families are often housed in temporary accommodation.
Settlement agreements in an employment context are ordinarily used to provide both parties with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship – but what happens when there is alleged discrimination after entering into a settlement agreement?
Updates include UK Shared Prosperity Fund, contracts, Subsidy Control Bill, data controller liability, Government Covid-19 procurement and Highway Code revisions.
The complex and rather nebulous transitional subsidy control regime set out in the UK-EU Trade and Co-operation Agreement and the UK’s wider international commitments has made it difficult for public authorities and those working with them to proceed with certainty where subsidies are involved.
