The UK general insurance market has for some time now been experiencing significant regulatory scrutiny, even pressure. There has been particular focus on the intermediation that procures customers' agreements with insurers, and the influence of intermediation on claims.
The UK general insurance market has for some time now been experiencing significant regulatory scrutiny, even pressure. There has been particular focus on the intermediation that procures customers' agreements with insurers, and the influence of intermediation on claims.
It has been suggested that the market is merely the collateral victim of regulators' actions in respect of the banking industry ('it's the bankers' fault!').
This article is the first in a series that considers whether such a suggestion is correct. Are UK regulators newly seeking to apply to the insurance industry standards and frameworks originally or primarily, perhaps more properly, applicable to the banking industry? In other words, 'Is insurance the new banking?'
Complainants about the treatment of the general insurance market might, for instance, point to the Senior Managers & Certification Regime (SM&CR). The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has explained the genesis of the SM&CR as follows:
"In response to the 2008 banking crisis and [later] … conduct failings … Parliament set up the Parliamentary Commission for Banking Standards (PCBS) to … improve standards in … banking...
"PCBS recommended a new accountability framework focused on senior management … that firms take more responsibility for employees being fit and proper, and that there be better standards of conduct...
"legislation in December 2013, [led] to the FCA and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) applying the SM&CR to the banking sector … further … legislation in May 2016 [extended] the [SM&CR] to all … authorised firms."
The above supports an argument that recent regulation is a by-product of banking regulation. There is, however, an alternative view, derived from the period between the introduction of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and the 2008 financial crisis: current regulatory initiatives are connected to issues identified in that period.
In 2002 the FSA published a "Future of Insurance Regulation - progress update" that included the following issues for general insurance:
In October 2004, the Attorney General of New York issued proceedings against various intermediaries alleging that certain commission arrangements with certain insurers led to the placement of risks with those insurers, without insureds' knowledge of those arrangements or their ramifications for choice over counterparties, terms and premiums.
The proceedings led to extensive commentary as to general insurance working practices and were mentioned in the FCA's 2017 terms of reference for its study of the wholesale (GI) brokers market.
In December 2004, a speech by John Tiner of the FSA famously challenged the UK – and, in particular, the London – market to end its "deal now, detail later" practices and culture, which left insureds, insurers and intermediaries facing operational and legal risks through the absence of timely and complete documentation of contractual terms. The market focused heavily on this documentation issue, which resulted in the introduction of highly publicised 'contract certainty' processes.
The speech identified various other cultural problems. It cited a November 2004 report by the Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation that the insurance market was "riddled with the kind of Spanish practices that banking dumped years ago". The speech highlighted inter alia "conflicts of interest" and "quality of systems and controls around binding authorities" plus the need for "high standards in … claims handling".
Given the above history of regulator pronouncements, it is arguable that regulators are catching up on applying greater controls over the conduct of firms and their key individuals. This may be because regulators were distracted from doing so by the financial crisis and the reappraisal of banking regulation. As such, it is arguable that 'the bankers' provided the insurance market with a decade's delay in an otherwise inevitable process of regulatory re-engineering.
A viewpoint as above is likely to have been strengthened by recent findings as to previously-identified problems. Last month, the FCA issued Thematic Review (TR19/2) on the general insurance distribution chain. Its aim was to scrutinise general insurance distribution arrangements that "have become long and complex, with multiple parties involved in the manufacture, distribution and delivery of insurance products and services" especially where there is "significant influence from parties that are not FCA regulated".
The review was of three products; travel, tradesman and Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP)/motor ancillary insurance:
The review identified "Specific examples of … potential harms" including:
The review identified two key causes for the above:
Manifestations of the above causes included:
From a regulator's perspective, there is clear continuity in the issues summarised in 2002-2004 and 2018-2019. The regulator has the same concerns, and the practices giving rise to those concerns are in essence the same:
Perhaps for regulators general insurance is not so much 'the new banking' but an 'old chestnut' or tough nut that the SM&CR can help crack.
This article was originally published by Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence on 14 May 2019.
Logistics company Eddie Stobart has been fined £133,000, after a series of failures which took place whilst excavation work was carried out, exposing its staff to asbestos.
This article is the second in a series to help firms take a practical approach to complying with the ‘cross-cutting rules’ within the new ‘Consumer Duty’ (CD) framework. The article summarises what it seems the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is seeking to achieve from the applicable rules (section 2 below) and potential complications arising from legal considerations (section 3).
Claims arising from interest-only mortgages have been farmed in volume. Many such claims to date have sought to drive a narrative that interest-only mortgages are an inherently toxic product and brokers were negligent simply for suggesting them. Taylor is a helpful recalibration, focussing instead on what the monies raised by the mortgage product were being used for and whether the client understood the inherent risks.
Two directors of a construction company were fined after failing to ensure the safe removal of asbestos from a plot of land. On 14 and 15 November 2021, Directors Anthony Sumner and Neil Brown, of Waterbarn Limited were involved in the uncontrolled removal of asbestos material from a plot of land in Grasscroft, Oldham.
An engineering company in Tyne and Wear was fined £20,000 after a worker fractured his pelvis and suffered internal injuries after falling through a petrol station forecourt canopy, whilst he was replacing the guttering.
The Digital Services Act (the “DSA”) has today (27 October) been given the go-ahead by the EU Council and will enter into force by early 2024.
In a judgment handed down yesterday the Supreme Court has affirmed that a so called “creditor duty” exists for directors such that in some circumstances company directors are required to act in accordance with, or to consider the interests of creditors. Those circumstances potentially arise when a company is insolvent or where there is a “probability” of an insolvency. We explore below the “trigger” for such a test to apply and its implications.
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) have announced they will be carrying out a programme of inspections to primary and secondary school establishments from September 2022. The inspections will assess how schools are managing the risks from asbestos and meeting the Duty to Manage requirements, set out in Regulation 4 of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012.
The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the BTI v Sequana appeal and reviewed the existence, content and engagement of the so-called ‘creditor duty’; being the point at which the interest of creditors is said to intrude upon the decision-making of directors of companies in financial distress.
This article is the first in a series aimed to help firms get to grips on a practical basis with the ‘cross-cutting rules’ within the new ‘Consumer Duty’ framework.
The Government has announced a change to the categorisation of “small” businesses to reduce the amount of regulatory compliance (or “red tape”) required. Currently, SMEs (those with fewer than 250 employees) are exempt from certain regulations – such as the obligation to comply with gender pay reporting. With effect from 3 October, these exemptions will be widened to apply to businesses with fewer than 500 employees.
The use of social media platforms and applications can have overwhelmingly positive benefits for public bodies. However, regulatory action recently taken by the Information Commissioner, has highlighted various pitfalls that public bodies should seek to avoid if allowing staff to use social media as a communication tool.
Browne Jacobson’s corporate finance lawyers have advised leading private equity investor, Rcapital Partners LLP (Rcapital) on its majority stake acquisition of managing general agents (MGAs), UK General Insurance Ltd (UKG) and Precision Partnership Limited (PPL) alongside Montague Investment Group LLP who are taking a minority stake.
Whilst the weather conditions are predicted to be cooling down this week, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is asking employers and businesses to consider adapting to recurrent warmer weather conditions for the safety and benefit of their staff. It asks employers to ensure that extreme heat becomes a firm part of longer term risk management. Climate change in any event is something all businesses will need to consider as the warmer weather becomes more frequent - extreme heat is something that will impact employers on a day to day basis.
There are clearly challenging macro-economic factors at play but at Browne Jacobson we continue to see good levels of transactional activity with certain sectors being particularly buoyant: healthcare, financial services, energy & infrastructure and tech.
Browne Jacobson continues to see good levels of transactional activity with certain sectors being particularly buoyant: healthcare, financial services, energy & infrastructure and tech.
In this session, our speakers discussed the Fitness to Practise Regime and how we can help.
Bridget Tatham, a specialist defendant insurance lawyer at Browne Jacobson has been honoured at this year’s Birmingham Black Lawyer (BBL) Excellence Awards, having been named Lawyer of the Year. Bridget was also shortlisted for BBL’s Diversity Champion 2022.