Agile contracting in Government
The key benefits and pitfalls for agile software contracting, and recommendations for government bodies.
What is agile software contracting?
When it comes to the development of software, the traditional model for development is a process known as “waterfall”, whereby one phase needs to be completed before moving to the next phase. A waterfall approach is often considered as a linear and sequential style, where phases flow downward to the next. This approach requires the functional and non-functional requirements to be defined at the outset so that the build and testing phases can be carried out to ensure those requirements are met.
The charging mechanism for waterfall contracting tends to be fixed price for licence and support (and hosting where this is also required), and will sometimes have additional time-and-materials pricing in respect of consultancy services required for installation/implementation. Depending on the nature of the consultancy and the bargaining strengths of the parties, it is not unusual to see fixed-price mechanisms in respect of consultancy services being payable against achievement of milestones. There may also be consumption-based charging mechanisms included in respect of operational services to provide for a scalable solution. Agile contracting is an alternative method to a waterfall structure, using instead an incremental approach based on principles which focus more on individuals, interactions, results, collaboration and flexible responses to change. Essentially, agile contracting breaks down the process into small steps which are delivered in short timeframes (also known as “sprints”). Sprints could include design, development, testing and showcasing. The principles do not follow a linear start-and-stop process, but instead favour a constant cycle of small processes as required to improve output.
Each deliverable or iteration goes through a lifecycle, which can be anything up to around four weeks. The lifecycle includes designing, building and testing the deliverable or iteration to eventually produce a tangible product which has some value or benefit to the customer, such as a component of software.
Throughout the deliverable or iteration lifecycle, daily meetings are held where the parties report on:
- what work has been completed since the last meeting;
- what work is planned to be completed before the next meeting;
- any obstacles to completing the work.
This methodology is preferred where an organisation is aware that it needs a technological solution but does not know what that solution might look like in terms of functionality and/or performance. It may therefore decide to build up the solution on an incremental basis via storyboards and product backlogs.
This allows flexibility to work up the solution and tailor it to the requirements of the organisation piece by piece. However, a pure agile solution is usually charged on a time-and-materials basis, without certainty of tangible outputs.
Key benefits and pitfalls
By following an agile approach, a project with a number of sprints can benefit from faster software-development lifecycles, flexibility in adapting to change, and greater efficiency in communication between teams.
A common concern with agile working, arising from the fluidity in working processes, is the lack of certainty on charges and tangible outputs as mentioned. The more the parties move to fixed-scope and fixed-price contracting, the more the parties move away from agile contracting methodology. Variations to the time-and-materials pricing mechanisms can be adopted such as:
- time and materials capped per iteration or deliverable;
- time and materials capped per iteration or deliverable with adjustment (the adjustment would apply where the time and materials charges accrued are less than the agreed cap. The parties may agree that the difference between the cap and the accrued charges are apportioned between the parties);
- target cost pricing (this is a gain/pain sharing mechanism where the parties agree to allocate an agreed adjustment amount if the actual costs exceed or are less than the agreed target costs);
- fixed price per iteration or deliverable.
A clear distinction between agile and waterfall contracting is agile contracting’s emphasis on collaboration. Throughout the deliverable or iteration lifecycle, both parties will work together at each stage to achieve the objectives. Agile contracting is therefore much more resource-intensive on the part of the customer, compared to what customers may be used to in traditional waterfall contracting.
Recommendations
Given that there is a lack of certainty on costing in agile-working models, Government bodies should proceed with caution to ensure budgetary constraints and objectives and requirements can be met. In our experience, once the risks of agile contracting have been explained, clients shy away from the model and quite often end up with a hybrid model which is, in our opinion, unsatisfactory from a contractual perspective. This is usually because legal advice is sought later in the process when the supplier has already convinced its customer that agile is the right way to go!
When negotiating a contract based on agile principles, Government bodies should consider the scope of work and ensure that it includes definitive measurables on how to determine progress in the project. Such points are often excluded or unclear within an agile model.
Agile contracting typically focuses on dynamic fast-paced delivery, creating a risk of substantial strain on the teams involved in delivering the product. As such, Government bodies must ensure that appropriate and skilled resources are available and utilised effectively for the particular project. Significant and high-level stakeholder input will also be required in order to make real-time decisions on the development of the project throughout its lifecycle, which is a significant commitment when compared to a traditional waterfall model.
If a Government body has a set budget and wants control over charges, then agile contracting may not be the right way to proceed. However, if there is some flexibility around budget and the overriding objective is to ensure that the solution fits the need, then agile contracting methodology may be a consideration.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement reform: Making poor performance a thing of the past
Legal Update
Managing the expiry of PFI contracts
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Act: the even lighter touch regime
Legal Update
Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme update October 2023: More funding announced
Published Article
Infrastructure and social value in public contracts – making it concrete
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill: Competitive flexible procedure, how will this work in practice?
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill - Are they still playing ping-pong?
Legal Update
Wales Infrastructure Bill: Unified process for significant infrastructure projects?
Legal Update
PPN 08/23: using standard contracts
Published Article
Kick-starting the UK hydrogen economy
Legal Update
What are we to do about self reporting in PFI contracts?
Legal Update
Guidance on contract changes: James Waste Management LLP v Essex County Council
Article
Challenging procurement decisions by way of Judicial Review - the key principles
Published Article
Amendments to Procurement Bill: Navigating sanctions and supplier bans and impact on the construction sector
On-Demand
'Getting ready to reform – preparing for the new Procurement Bill' webinar
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise London borough councils on key social infrastructure PFI deal for streetlighting in Croydon and Lewisham
Legal Update
Retirement housing: A solution to our care and housing crises?
Legal Update
Back in the (Investment) Zone… sort of
Legal Update
A new era of opportunity for high street regeneration?
Legal Update
HMRC change to VAT treatment of local authorities and leisure services
Guide
Devolution: a catalyst for long-term, positive change in local communities
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill debarment regime and ECHR issues
Published Article
Digital Twin Technologies: key legal contractual considerations
Guide - Procurement Act
Public procurement: key facts and compliance considerations
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s real estate specialists advise Chesterfield Borough Council on prestigious new development - One Waterside Place
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise High Peak Borough Council on future high street funded acquisition as part of Buxton regeneration vision
Published Article
Reaching cloud nine? Public procurement for cloud-based services
Published Article
How the Environment Act affects existing contracts’
Legal Update
Updated Greening Government Commitments 2021 – 2025 published
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Bromley Council on the first social housing initiative of its kind to tackle homelessness
Opinion - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill - what’s new in 2022?
Published Article
The role of Legal Project Management in public sector projects
The concept of Legal Project Management (“LPM”) is increasingly relevant to the delivery of legal services, both in-house functions and private practice law. This is unsurprising, LPM is crucial if lawyers are to add value by controlling budgets, communicate pro-actively on risk mitigation and costs, and manage time by resourcing to deal with pinch points in the project.
Legal Update
Regeneration funding: Securing Compulsory Purchase Orders in the face of escalating building costs
The focus on the Levelling Up agenda and the availability of grant funding, means there are numerous important regeneration schemes actively being pursued across the country. With ever-escalating project and building costs, in many cases, applications that were made for grant funding were based on costs contingencies that have already been exceeded.
Published Article
Levelling up – the role of public and private partnerships
With aims to level up the UK, and ensure that everyone has the opportunity to flourish, public and private partnerships will be critical success factor. In this article, we look at the role that private finance can play in the performance of a local area and how it might link to regeneration. We also consider the role of central government and regional mayors.
Legal Update - Procurement Act
The Procurement Bill - selection, exclusion, conflict of interests and debarment
Legal Update
The Race to Net Zero: Commercial and Legal Considerations
This article covers, at a high level, some of the legal issues that arise in the lifecycle of the innovation and deployment of new technology within the energy sector. It is not intended to be a comprehensive account of all legal aspects.
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Public procurement: Plus ça change, plus c’est la même choses
Legal Update
Agile contracting in Government
The key benefits and pitfalls for agile software contracting, and recommendations for government bodies.
Legal Update
R (Good Law Project) v Minister for the Cabinet Office [2022] EWCA Civ 21
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s government & infrastructure lawyers advise on first South West based green hydrogen production project
Browne Jacobson’s specialist government and infrastructure team have advised Canford Renewable Energy Ltd on the delivery of its Dorset Green H2 facility.