What are the key changes to Practice Direction 57AC and Statement of Best Practice, and what are the challenges for legal representatives?
This article is taken from March's public matters newsletter. Click here to view more articles from this issue.
Now that the Disclosure Pilot Scheme is fully underway in the Business and Property Courts, reform has turned its attention to the next phase in proceedings – witness statements.
From 6 April 2021, the way that witness statements for use at trial in the Business and Property Courts are prepared will change substantially, meaning there is more work to do. ‘Trial witness statements’ (with several exceptions) will have to comply with the recently published CPR Practice Direction 57AC (‘the Practice Direction’) and its accompanying Appendix: Statement of Best Practice (‘the Statement of Best Practice’).
The reforms are the outcome of the Witness Evidence Working Group (‘the Group’) which was set up by the Business and Property Courts in 2018 following concerns regarding the current system by Commercial Court Judges on whether witness statements were achieving their objective of providing best evidence at proportionate cost. In a final report published by the Group, a constant theme was ‘over-lawyering’ of witness statements including the tendency to recite documents exhibited to the statement. The report suggested forming a statement of best practice regarding the preparation of witness statements which is how we have arrived at the creation of the Practice Direction and the Statement of Best Practice.
The Practice Direction does not apply across the board. It only applies to witness statements for use at trials in the Business and Property Courts signed on or after 6 April 2021. Witness statements also include supplementary or reply statements. Proceedings in which the Practice Direction does not apply (unless the court otherwise directs) are set out in para 1.3 of the Practice Direction, including certain claims under the Companies Act 2006 and Insolvency proceedings.
The Practice Direction has no effect on:
As set out in para 2.1 of the Practice Direction, the purpose of witness statements is to set out in writing the evidence in chief that a witness of fact would give if they were allowed to give oral evidence at trial. The purpose is also to promote the overriding objective of the CPR by helping the Court deal with claims justly, efficiently and at proportionate cost.
The Practice Direction sets out new requirements regarding the content of factual witness statements. It attempts to separate evidence of fact in respect of a witness’ personal account from arguments, commentary and documentary evidence.
Witness statements must be drafted in accordance with the Practice Direction and the Statement of Best Practice (and any relevant court guide).
Legal representatives must explain to a witness: (i) the purpose of a witness statement; (ii) the proper context of the witness statement and (iii) the proper practice in relation to the preparation of the witness statement. The witness must understand what is required of them.
Legal representatives should try to conduct an interview with the witness and take full and accurate notes of the evidence which is to be contained in the witness statement. Ideally, the interview should be recorded. A record of the evidence given by the witness will act as a safety net for the legal representative should questions be raised about the preparation of the witness statement later. Legal representatives should carry out the interview by using open questions. Leading questions should be avoided.
Legal representatives should be alive to the fact that the witness statement must state only that which the witness claims to personally recollect that is relevant to one or more of the issues of fact to be decided at trial.
The witness statement must also identify what documents (by way of a list), if any, the witness has referred to or been referred to for the purpose of providing the evidence set out in the witness statement. Documents referred to need to be easily located at trial.
The requirement to identify documents which the witness has referred to (or has been referred to) does not affect any privilege that may exist in relation to any of those documents.
The Practice Direction requires the witness statement to be drafted in the witness’ own words, language and in the first person.
Regardless of whether a party is legally represented or not, in addition to the usual statement of truth, the witness statement must (unless the court orders otherwise) include a Confirmation of Compliance (as per the below) signed by the witness as set out in paragraph 4.1 of the Practice Direction.
"I have read (or if applicable have had read to me),and understand paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Practice Direction 57AC and paragraph 1.3, 2.2 to 2.6 and 3.2 to 3.7 of the appendix to that practice direction, in relation to the purpose and proper content of trial witness statements and proper practice in relation to their preparation".
In addition to the Confirmation of Compliance, pursuant to 4.1 of the Practice Direction (where a party is legally represented at the time of signing the witness statement), the witness statement must, unless the court orders otherwise, be endorsed with a certificate of compliance, signed by the legal representative. The purpose of the certificate is for the legal representative to certify that the purpose, proper content and practice in relation to witness statement preparation has been discussed with their client and that the legal representative believes that the witness statement complies with the Practice Direction.
The Practice Direction brings with it a number of challenges which legal representatives must bear in mind, including:
It is therefore likely that the witness statement phase of proceedings will become more time consuming.
The Practice Direction provides strong guidance to make witness statements more concise and it is hoped will reduce the amount of unnecessary evidence at trial.
Sanctions in the court process can be costly and the Practice Direction is no exception to this. If you get it wrong the court may upon application by any other party or by its own motion:
Despite the purpose of the Practice Direction and the Statement of Best Practice being to refocus the parties’ attention on the purpose of a trial witness statement with a view to saving both cost and time, the onus for ensuring compliance is firmly on the parties’ legal representatives. Legal representatives must make friends with the Practice Direction and the Statement of Best Practice well before the 6 April 2021. Only time will tell what specific impacts the Practice Direction will have.
| Key points to be aware of | Practical tips |
| The Confirmation of Compliance. | Preparation is key! Familiarise yourself with the Practice Direction. |
| The Certificate of Compliance. | Have a separate pack of documents for each witness. |
| Understand who the witnesses will be from the outset of the dispute and ensure that they are aware of the Practice Direction. | Record interviews with witnesses and keep accurate records. |
| Think about what evidence the witness can provide. | Attendance |
| Open questions only | Identify only the facts that need to be proven at trial |
| The sanctions! | Ensure that you understand the rules and get it right! |
Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Announced in September but scrapped on 17 November the investment zone proposals were very short lived. The proposal has now morphed into the proposal for a smaller number of clustered zones earmarked for investment.
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
Across the UK, homelessness is an urgent crisis, and one that is set to grow amid the rising cost of living. Local authorities are at the forefront of responding to this crisis, but with a lack of properties that are suitable for social housing across the UK, vulnerable individuals and families are often housed in temporary accommodation.
Claims arising from interest-only mortgages have been farmed in volume. Many such claims to date have sought to drive a narrative that interest-only mortgages are an inherently toxic product and brokers were negligent simply for suggesting them. Taylor is a helpful recalibration, focussing instead on what the monies raised by the mortgage product were being used for and whether the client understood the inherent risks.
Updates include UK Shared Prosperity Fund, contracts, Subsidy Control Bill, data controller liability, Government Covid-19 procurement and Highway Code revisions.
