What are the key changes to Practice Direction 57AC and Statement of Best Practice, and what are the challenges for legal representatives?
This article is taken from March's public matters newsletter. Click here to view more articles from this issue.
Now that the Disclosure Pilot Scheme is fully underway in the Business and Property Courts, reform has turned its attention to the next phase in proceedings – witness statements.
From 6 April 2021, the way that witness statements for use at trial in the Business and Property Courts are prepared will change substantially, meaning there is more work to do. ‘Trial witness statements’ (with several exceptions) will have to comply with the recently published CPR Practice Direction 57AC (‘the Practice Direction’) and its accompanying Appendix: Statement of Best Practice (‘the Statement of Best Practice’).
The reforms are the outcome of the Witness Evidence Working Group (‘the Group’) which was set up by the Business and Property Courts in 2018 following concerns regarding the current system by Commercial Court Judges on whether witness statements were achieving their objective of providing best evidence at proportionate cost. In a final report published by the Group, a constant theme was ‘over-lawyering’ of witness statements including the tendency to recite documents exhibited to the statement. The report suggested forming a statement of best practice regarding the preparation of witness statements which is how we have arrived at the creation of the Practice Direction and the Statement of Best Practice.
The Practice Direction does not apply across the board. It only applies to witness statements for use at trials in the Business and Property Courts signed on or after 6 April 2021. Witness statements also include supplementary or reply statements. Proceedings in which the Practice Direction does not apply (unless the court otherwise directs) are set out in para 1.3 of the Practice Direction, including certain claims under the Companies Act 2006 and Insolvency proceedings.
The Practice Direction has no effect on:
As set out in para 2.1 of the Practice Direction, the purpose of witness statements is to set out in writing the evidence in chief that a witness of fact would give if they were allowed to give oral evidence at trial. The purpose is also to promote the overriding objective of the CPR by helping the Court deal with claims justly, efficiently and at proportionate cost.
The Practice Direction sets out new requirements regarding the content of factual witness statements. It attempts to separate evidence of fact in respect of a witness’ personal account from arguments, commentary and documentary evidence.
Witness statements must be drafted in accordance with the Practice Direction and the Statement of Best Practice (and any relevant court guide).
Legal representatives must explain to a witness: (i) the purpose of a witness statement; (ii) the proper context of the witness statement and (iii) the proper practice in relation to the preparation of the witness statement. The witness must understand what is required of them.
Legal representatives should try to conduct an interview with the witness and take full and accurate notes of the evidence which is to be contained in the witness statement. Ideally, the interview should be recorded. A record of the evidence given by the witness will act as a safety net for the legal representative should questions be raised about the preparation of the witness statement later. Legal representatives should carry out the interview by using open questions. Leading questions should be avoided.
Legal representatives should be alive to the fact that the witness statement must state only that which the witness claims to personally recollect that is relevant to one or more of the issues of fact to be decided at trial.
The witness statement must also identify what documents (by way of a list), if any, the witness has referred to or been referred to for the purpose of providing the evidence set out in the witness statement. Documents referred to need to be easily located at trial.
The requirement to identify documents which the witness has referred to (or has been referred to) does not affect any privilege that may exist in relation to any of those documents.
The Practice Direction requires the witness statement to be drafted in the witness’ own words, language and in the first person.
Regardless of whether a party is legally represented or not, in addition to the usual statement of truth, the witness statement must (unless the court orders otherwise) include a Confirmation of Compliance (as per the below) signed by the witness as set out in paragraph 4.1 of the Practice Direction.
"I have read (or if applicable have had read to me),and understand paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Practice Direction 57AC and paragraph 1.3, 2.2 to 2.6 and 3.2 to 3.7 of the appendix to that practice direction, in relation to the purpose and proper content of trial witness statements and proper practice in relation to their preparation".
In addition to the Confirmation of Compliance, pursuant to 4.1 of the Practice Direction (where a party is legally represented at the time of signing the witness statement), the witness statement must, unless the court orders otherwise, be endorsed with a certificate of compliance, signed by the legal representative. The purpose of the certificate is for the legal representative to certify that the purpose, proper content and practice in relation to witness statement preparation has been discussed with their client and that the legal representative believes that the witness statement complies with the Practice Direction.
The Practice Direction brings with it a number of challenges which legal representatives must bear in mind, including:
It is therefore likely that the witness statement phase of proceedings will become more time consuming.
The Practice Direction provides strong guidance to make witness statements more concise and it is hoped will reduce the amount of unnecessary evidence at trial.
Sanctions in the court process can be costly and the Practice Direction is no exception to this. If you get it wrong the court may upon application by any other party or by its own motion:
Despite the purpose of the Practice Direction and the Statement of Best Practice being to refocus the parties’ attention on the purpose of a trial witness statement with a view to saving both cost and time, the onus for ensuring compliance is firmly on the parties’ legal representatives. Legal representatives must make friends with the Practice Direction and the Statement of Best Practice well before the 6 April 2021. Only time will tell what specific impacts the Practice Direction will have.
| Key points to be aware of | Practical tips |
| The Confirmation of Compliance. | Preparation is key! Familiarise yourself with the Practice Direction. |
| The Certificate of Compliance. | Have a separate pack of documents for each witness. |
| Understand who the witnesses will be from the outset of the dispute and ensure that they are aware of the Practice Direction. | Record interviews with witnesses and keep accurate records. |
| Think about what evidence the witness can provide. | Attendance |
| Open questions only | Identify only the facts that need to be proven at trial |
| The sanctions! | Ensure that you understand the rules and get it right! |
Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023:
Announced in September but scrapped on 17 November the investment zone proposals were very short lived. The proposal has now morphed into the proposal for a smaller number of clustered zones earmarked for investment.
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship. There are already restrictions on the extent to which personal injury claims can be settled by a settlement agreement. There have also been numerous consultations about the use of non-disclosure agreements and confidentiality clauses, particularly where allegations of sexual harassment and discrimination have been raised. In any event, it is clear that settlement agreements should not be used to prevent an employee from raising a protected disclosure.
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
Across the UK, homelessness is an urgent crisis, and one that is set to grow amid the rising cost of living. Local authorities are at the forefront of responding to this crisis, but with a lack of properties that are suitable for social housing across the UK, vulnerable individuals and families are often housed in temporary accommodation.
Claims arising from interest-only mortgages have been farmed in volume. Many such claims to date have sought to drive a narrative that interest-only mortgages are an inherently toxic product and brokers were negligent simply for suggesting them. Taylor is a helpful recalibration, focussing instead on what the monies raised by the mortgage product were being used for and whether the client understood the inherent risks.
In an effort to build a stronger justice system, a shift in priorities has emerged away from adversarial court battles and more towards opportunities for consensual resolution. As one of the most popular forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), mediation has become increasingly encouraged.
Updates include UK Shared Prosperity Fund, contracts, Subsidy Control Bill, data controller liability, Government Covid-19 procurement and Highway Code revisions.
The complex and rather nebulous transitional subsidy control regime set out in the UK-EU Trade and Co-operation Agreement and the UK’s wider international commitments has made it difficult for public authorities and those working with them to proceed with certainty where subsidies are involved.
Investment zones have been introduced by the Conservative party to get the United Kingdom (UK) ‘working, building and growing’. They are to be designated sites which provide time-limited tax incentives, streamlined planning rules and wider support for local growth to encourage investment and accelerate the development of housing and infrastructure that the UK needs to drive economic growth. Processes and requirements that slow down development will be stripped back with the intention of attracting new investment.
In a judgment handed down yesterday the Supreme Court has affirmed that a so called “creditor duty” exists for directors such that in some circumstances company directors are required to act in accordance with, or to consider the interests of creditors. Those circumstances potentially arise when a company is insolvent or where there is a “probability” of an insolvency. We explore below the “trigger” for such a test to apply and its implications.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
Practice Direction 57AC (“PD57AC”) relates to witness evidence in trials and explicitly applies only to the Business and Property Courts. It applies to existing proceedings in which the witness statements for trial are signed on or after 6 April 2021.
It is clear that the digital landscape, often termed cyberspace, is a man-made environment, in which human behaviour dominates and where technology both influences and aids our role in it — through the internet, telecoms and networked computer systems, which are often interdependent. The extent to which any organisation is potentially vulnerable to cyber-attack depends on how well these elements are aligned.
Three months on from the commencement of the new statutory Integrated Care Systems (ICS) Anja Beriro and Gerrard Hanratty reflect on the main themes and issues that have come from the new relationship between local government and health.
The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the BTI v Sequana appeal and reviewed the existence, content and engagement of the so-called ‘creditor duty’; being the point at which the interest of creditors is said to intrude upon the decision-making of directors of companies in financial distress.
The Procurement Bill (the Bill) has now been with us for about four months, during which time there have been a huge number of amendments proposed in the House of Lords (circa 320). Lately, there has been less mention of it — unsurprising, really, given everything else going on in politics recently — but here’s a summary of some of the key issues and themes so far.
Browne Jacobson has been named as a supplier on Crown Commercial Service’s (CCS) Public Sector Legal Services Framework on Lot 1a – full-service provision (England and Wales) and Lot 2a – general service provision (England and Wales).
The increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionising the way businesses operate and is having a disruptive impact in sectors that have traditionally been slow to modernise.
Welcome to our September edition of Public Matters, our monthly round-up of legal updates, news and insights for the public sector.
Since the UK left the EU and are now able to move away from the EU data protection regime, the UK government have implemented a national data strategy with the aim of reducing the burden on organisations but maintaining a high data protection standard.
The Chancellor’s recent mini-budget provided a significant announcement for business as it was confirmed that the off-payroll working rules (known as “IR35”) put in place for public and private sector businesses from 2017 and 2021 will be scrapped from April 2023.
Devolution is the transfer of powers in areas like transport, housing and skills in England and since the Cities and Local Government Devolution Act 2016 has been a much-discussed topic.
In this article we look at local authority companies and whether they are subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000. And for those that are, what information are they legally obliged to submit.
The Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) has published a consultation on proposals to require Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) administering authorities (AAs) in England and Wales to assess, manage and report on climate change risks.
The concept of Legal Project Management (“LPM”) is increasingly relevant to the delivery of legal services, both in-house functions and private practice law. This is unsurprising, LPM is crucial if lawyers are to add value by controlling budgets, communicate pro-actively on risk mitigation and costs, and manage time by resourcing to deal with pinch points in the project.
Welcome to our August edition of Public Matters, our monthly round-up of legal updates, news and insights for the public sector.
On 31 August 2022, the Court of Appeal handed down the Judgment in respect of the appeal case of HXA v Surrey County Council and YXA v Wolverhampton City Council [2022].
This month, HM Treasury issued a consultation on Administrative Control Process for Public Sector Exits with draft guidance. They’re proposing to introduce an expanded approvals process for employee exits and special severance payments, and additional reporting requirements. If approved, the proposals will impact public sector bodies and those that do not have a specific right to make exit payments.
The focus on the Levelling Up agenda and the availability of grant funding, means there are numerous important regeneration schemes actively being pursued across the country. With ever-escalating project and building costs, in many cases, applications that were made for grant funding were based on costs contingencies that have already been exceeded.
The Government has recently published its response to the consultation on Subsidies and Schemes of Interest and of Particular Interest under the Subsidy Control Act 2022. In this article, our subsidy control experts discuss some of the key points coming out of the response, and their impact for public authorities.
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards was due to transition to Liberty Protection Safeguards in October 2020 but delayed due to the pandemic. While the public consultation has now closed and we’re still unclear of what the final legislation and code will look like, it’s worth noting and keeping a watching brief.
In November 2021, The Civil Justice Council’s published its interim report on proposed changes to the current Pre-Action Protocols, which included a mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) gateway. In this article, we look at proposed reforms and consider what this could mean for your case.
The use of social media platforms and applications can have overwhelmingly positive benefits for public bodies. However, regulatory action recently taken by the Information Commissioner, has highlighted various pitfalls that public bodies should seek to avoid if allowing staff to use social media as a communication tool.
A Register of Overseas Entities was first proposed in 2016. Whilst progress over recent years has been slow, its establishment was given fresh impetus by the current tragic events in Ukraine.
Janice Walsh applied for a job with Domino’s Pizza, hoping to secure a role as a Delivery Driver. However things quickly took a turn for the worse during her initial interview, with the very first question that she was asked relating to her age. Ms Walsh was ultimately informed that she had not been successful in her application.
