Procurement and Coronavirus
The UK is preparing for high rates of sickness, voluntary or imposed absence from work and the possibility of more severe measures from central government to prevent the spread of the virus; but how will this impact upon your current procurement schedules and requirements?
Please note: the information contained in this legal update is correct as of the original date of publication
This article is taken from March's public matters newsletter. Click here to view more articles from this issue.
The UK is preparing for high rates of sickness, voluntary or imposed absence from work and the possibility of more severe measures from central government to prevent the spread of the virus; but how will this impact upon your current procurement schedules and requirements?
We have considered below which provisions under the Public Contract Regulations 2015 (the PCR) can assist you in your contracting and procurement requirements in the coming months.
What is permitted under the PCR when changing contracts in the current challenging environment?
It is predicted that the movement, shopping habits and needs of the population will change over the coming months which is likely to result in a shift of focus from ongoing projects to additional support in the care and health sectors. This may well mean that you need to change or increase the scope of your current contracts to deal with this.
The PCR allows, through regulation 72, a number of “safe harbours” when contracting authorities need to modify existing contracts in a way which does not require a fresh procurement.
Before looking at the specific safe harbours it is always worth considering whether the modification is substantial at all. Regulation 72 (1) (e) provides that modifications that do not amount to substantial modifications (as defined in regulation 72 (8)) will be permitted. This is not normally easy to justify but you should do that first before looking at the other parts of 72.
Regulation 72 (1) (a) allows modification made by way of a clear and unequivocal review clause. The level of specificity needed for this provision means that this is unlikely to be usable in this unprecedented situation but of course your contract should be checked to see whether this kind of pandemic event was covered off.
Regulation 72 (1) (b) allows modifications to accommodate additional works, services or supplies by the original contractor, which have become necessary but were not included in the initial procurement, where a change of contractor, can’t be made for economic or technical reasons, would cause significant inconvenience and substantial duplication of costs for the contracting authority and any increase in price must also not exceed 50% of the value of the original contract. This provision does not require any degree of foreseeability so provided you meet the tests you can utilise this to make the change to your contract.Regulation 72 (1) (c) allows a modification to an above threshold contract where the need for the modification has been brought about by circumstances which a diligent contracting authority could not have foreseen; the modification does not alter the overall nature of the contract and the price increase does not exceed 50% of the value of the original contract or framework agreement.
This provision will be helpful where there is a contract for existing services, but the need is increasing. While some variation of service can take place, the services purchased should be of the same ‘nature’ as those covered in the original contract.
Regulation 72 (5) also allows for minor changes i.e. below threshold and 10% of contract value (goods and services) or 15% (works).
If in your circumstances regulation 72 is not available for your situation what can you do? Regulation 32 allows a direct award of a contract without publication (a direct award) when for “reasons of extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority” there is not enough time to undertake one of the procedures under the PCR.
This may be useful where a need arises for which there is not a current contract, or if the existing service provider cannot meet demand, so a new provider and contract is required. The threshold for the use of this regulation is higher than for Regulation 72, and a lack of staff capacity to run a procurement process is not sufficient to justify the use of this provision. This provision should only be used to meet short term need and should not be relied upon to enter into a contract intended to continue materially beyond the containment of the outbreak.
When entering into a contract under this provision the authority must still prepare a report in accordance with Regulation 84, and this must set out the circumstances referred to in Regulation 32 which justify the use of this procedure.
While the situation is changing very rapidly the use of these provisions may be acceptable, but as we build up more information on the transmission and effective actions, which are being shown through other countries’ actions, more scrutiny may to be applied as to whether or not the contracting authority ought to have pre-empted the need.
Current procurements
For ongoing procurements, the following practical steps may need to be considered to allow the process to continue and to ensure that the bidders are treated fairly and equally:
- Making alternative provisions for bidders’ days, for example delivering this by online seminar allowing for questions, or a paper-based submission of questions
- Generally time limits may need to be extended and or you may have to consider the exercise of discretion in relation to process more.
- Whether changes are required to implementation or mobilisation timescales, or the commencement date for the contract, to ensure non-incumbent suppliers are not prejudiced
- f you anticipate changes in scope as a result of the pandemic, then the specification should be amended as early as possible and consider an extension to response deadlines
Procurement processes may be delayed or suspended by giving notice to all potential providers ensuring transparency and equal treatment. We anticipate that non business critical procurements are likely to be suspended to allow resource to be assigned to more urgent requirements where there are workforce shortages.
Bidders will also be affected by higher rates of absence, so unless the procurement is for a service required urgently then it is advisable to extend the procurement timetable for ongoing processes to ensure you receive the highest quality responses.
If a provision timetable was published as part of the ITT this should be republished with extended timescales so that all parties can clearly see the new intended timescales. If it is not possible to give updated timescales we would recommend setting a date for the next communication so that bidders are clear on when they will receive the next update.
Where a process cannot be supported or is no longer required it may be abandoned, but the authority should carefully consider a range of factors to ensure this is lawful.
When abandoning a procedure, the authority must notify all possible bidders of its decision, and any grounds for the decision not complete the process or appoint a provider (Regulation 55 (1) PCR). The grounds for abandonment must be consistent with the general EU principles of transparency and equal treatment. Abandonment becomes more difficult if the process is challenged and should be navigated sensitively.
Any changes made during the procurement process should be set out, along with the reasons for making the change, in the Regulation 84 report.
Existing Contracts and Force Majeure
Where there are existing contracts in place and either party is prevented from meeting their obligations under this, the ‘force majeure’ provisions of the contract should be considered. Please see our article HERE on force majeure.
Contact

Mark Hickson
Head of Business Development
onlineteaminbox@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)370 270 6000
Discover more
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill - Are they still playing ping-pong?
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Act 2023: Getting Ready for Reform - the countdown is on!
Legal Update
PPN 08/23: using standard contracts
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advising the Welsh Government on the delivery of significant number of renewable energy projects
Legal Update
Guidance on contract changes: James Waste Management LLP v Essex County Council
Legal Update
Case summary: the importance of bringing a procurement claim within the appropriate time limits
Legal Update - Procurement Act
New obligations for Welsh public bodies on social partnership and socially responsible procurement
Article
Challenging procurement decisions by way of Judicial Review - the key principles
Legal Update
Australia and New Zealand Free Trade Agreement drives changes to the Public Procurement rules
Published Article
Amendments to Procurement Bill: Navigating sanctions and supplier bans and impact on the construction sector
On-Demand
'Getting ready to reform – preparing for the new Procurement Bill' webinar
Legal Update
Changes to the Standard Selection Questionnaire effective from 1 April 2023
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Automatic suspension and procurement law
Press Release
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - February 2023
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill debarment regime and ECHR issues
Published Article
Digital Twin Technologies: key legal contractual considerations
Guide - Procurement Act
Public procurement: key facts and compliance considerations
Published Article
Reaching cloud nine? Public procurement for cloud-based services
Opinion - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill - what’s new in 2022?
Legal Update
CCGs’ conduct “sufficiently serious” for award of damages in High Court procurement case
This case provides a reminder to contracting authorities that whilst the bar for an award of damages in procurement cases is high, following the Supreme Court ruling in Energy Solutions EU Ltd v Nuclear Decommissioning Authority [2017] 1 WLR 1373, it is not insurmountable when a contracting authority has acted with disregard to the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCRs). There is also further guidance as to the use of frameworks
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Pre procurement planning the importance of early market engagement
On-Demand - Procurement Act
Get ready for reform: The new Procurement Bill
Legal Update - Procurement Act
The Procurement Bill - selection, exclusion, conflict of interests and debarment
Legal Update
The Introduction of the Social Partnership and Public Procurement (Wales) Bill by the Welsh Government
Published Article
Sustainability in construction
The climate emergency has reached a point where real and substantial damage is being caused to both the planet and society. There has been a shift from planning and theorising the most effective solutions, to a phase where practical, efficient, and sustainable solutions are required at speed.
Opinion
Responding to Grenfell – Slow progress is better than none
As the Grenfell Inquiry continues, how have the Phase 1 recommendations changed the fire safety and building safety landscape?
Legal Update
Modern Slavery and the NHS – new challenges on the horizon for NHS bodies and their suppliers
According to a report published by the Financial Reporting Council in April, modern slavery generates an estimated US$150 billion annually and encompasses 40 million people in slavery globally.
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Public procurement: Plus ça change, plus c’est la même choses
Legal Update
Contracts with Russian and Belarusian suppliers
We are all aware of the unfolding situation in Ukraine following the invasion of Russian forces, and the support afforded to Russia by Belarus. The UK Government has, in response to the conflict, issued sanctions on companies and individuals.
On-Demand - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill - key changes and how will it affect you?
On-Demand
Commissioning Health Tech in an ICS World
We invite you to watch our on-demand webinar which looks into how healthtech is commissioned from a health and tech perspective.
Legal Update
Progress of procurement reforms
As we look ahead to planned and potential legal developments in 2022, one area we have been keeping a close eye on is the progress of the Government’s planned reforms to procurement law.
Legal Update
R (Good Law Project) v Minister for the Cabinet Office [2022] EWCA Civ 21
Published Article
Implications of the amended public procurement thresholds
Legal Update
Procurement Policy Notice 09/21: Update to legal and policy requirements to publish procurement information on Contracts Finder
The Cabinet Office updated Procurement Policy Notice 09/21 and accompanying guidance in December 2021, which replaces PPN 07/21. We outline its scope, associated guidance and impact for contracting authorities.
Legal Update
Exclusion grounds under the new procurement regime
A range of questions were subject to consultation on the grounds for excluding bidders from a procurement process. We consider some of the key proposals which will be taken forward in the new regime.
Legal Update
New year, new Brexit transport rules
From 1st January, new import rules come into effect, with potential for significant delay, disruption and cost for importers and exporters.
Published Article
Transforming public procurement – the road to flexibility?
Legal Update
Long Read: Transforming Public Procurement: Government Response to Consultation
We review in detail the key highlights from the responses.