Mencap case: No entitlement to National Minimum Wage for sleep-in shifts
In a pivotal and much anticipated judgment for the social care sector, the Supreme Court has ruled that workers are not entitled to the National Minimum Wage for all time spent on a sleep-in shift.
In a pivotal and much anticipated judgment for the social care sector, the Supreme Court has ruled that workers are not entitled to the National Minimum Wage for all time spent on a sleep-in shift. In a judgment which will be welcomed by the care industry in particular, the appeal of Mencap worker Mrs Tomlinson-Blake was dismissed on the basis that the sleep-in provisions in the National Minimum Wage Regulations are clearly intended to mean that a worker who is permitted (and expected) to sleep during a shift and only required to respond to emergencies, is not entitled to have those hours included in the NMW calculation. In reaching their decision, the Supreme Court Justices were guided by the recommendations of the Low Pay Commission, which the Government is bound to follow and which are clear that sleep-in shifts should not attract NMW.
Employers in the care industry have been anxiously awaiting a decision in this case, which could have had potentially catastrophic consequences for the sector had it gone the other way. In the end, the Supreme Court was unanimous in its decision and employers in the sector can continue with the practice of paying a flat rate for sleep-in shifts safe in the knowledge that they are not falling foul of the NMW Regulations. However, employers should still take steps to ensure that any time which their sleep-in workers spend awake for the purposes of working is remunerated at NMW rates. Employers should also be mindful of the distinction between sleep-in shifts and on-call arrangements (e.g. where a worker is required to be at the workplace outside of normal working hours with the expectation that he or she will be required to work) as the latter would attract NMW.
Contact
Mark Hickson
Head of Business Development
onlineteaminbox@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)370 270 6000
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion - Maternity services
Newborns born outside of hospitals at higher risk of hypothermia during emergency responses
Opinion
Can teachers personal and political views amount to misconduct?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson to advise East London Waste Authority on major waste programme
Legal Update
ICO consultation on accessing care records: A legal perspective
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights round up - Spring 2024
Legal Update
Government updates guidance on holiday rules: What employers need to know
Legal Update
Court of Protection rules on capacity and best interests in pregnancy termination case involving detained woman
Online Event - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: focus on the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF)
Legal Update
Holiday pay: Government change clarifies treatment of term time only workers
Legal Update
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
Legal Update
Employment Healthcare Briefing - March 2024
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Greater Manchester Combined Authority on its investment in Beryl
Legal Update
The importance of including temporary staff in NHS patient safety investigations
Opinion
School attendance matters
Legal Update
Death certification reform in England and Wales – how will healthcare providers and commissioners be affected?
Opinion
Government’s Spring Budget invests millions in maternity safety
Opinion - Maternity services
Health Service Journal reports on growing trend of “free birthing”
Legal Update - Maternity services
Introduction of baby loss certificates gives recognition to millions of bereaved families in the UK
Legal Update
Charity law update – March 2024
Legal Update
Nearly all provisions of the Charities Act 2022 are now in force
Legal Update
New Charity Commission guidance on accepting, refusing and returning donations to your charity
Legal Update
Charitable fundraising and AI
Legal Update
NHS England publishes updated guidance on NHS subsidiary companies
Opinion
Caregivers at work: Navigating new carer's leave regulations
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Sexual safety in the workplace — how leaders can help to create a sexual safety culture
Opinion
EHRC publishes new guidance on menopause and the workplace
Legal Update - Health and Care Connect
Health and Care Connect: Health Check - March 2024
Legal Update
Braceurself Ltd v NHS England 2024: Court of Appeal procurement case decision
Opinion
Fire and re-hire: Updated statutory code summary for employers
Legal Update
Mental health law round up – February 2024
Legal Update - Maternity services
Chesterfield Royal Hospital ranked amongst the top Trusts nationally in the 2023 Maternity Survey
Published Article
Planning the future of healthcare
Legal Update
How do holiday pay reforms affect the education sector?
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Giving evidence before the Family Court - a practical session
Legal Update
Updated guidance on COPDOL11 (Re X) applications
Opinion - Maternity services
Coronial investigations of stillbirths - summary of consultation responses
Legal Update
Revised Acas Code of Practice on requests for flexible working
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Improving communication with families through the inquest process
Published Article
Legal frameworks for mental health
