Mencap case: No entitlement to National Minimum Wage for sleep-in shifts
In a pivotal and much anticipated judgment for the social care sector, the Supreme Court has ruled that workers are not entitled to the National Minimum Wage for all time spent on a sleep-in shift.
In a pivotal and much anticipated judgment for the social care sector, the Supreme Court has ruled that workers are not entitled to the National Minimum Wage for all time spent on a sleep-in shift. In a judgment which will be welcomed by the care industry in particular, the appeal of Mencap worker Mrs Tomlinson-Blake was dismissed on the basis that the sleep-in provisions in the National Minimum Wage Regulations are clearly intended to mean that a worker who is permitted (and expected) to sleep during a shift and only required to respond to emergencies, is not entitled to have those hours included in the NMW calculation. In reaching their decision, the Supreme Court Justices were guided by the recommendations of the Low Pay Commission, which the Government is bound to follow and which are clear that sleep-in shifts should not attract NMW.
Employers in the care industry have been anxiously awaiting a decision in this case, which could have had potentially catastrophic consequences for the sector had it gone the other way. In the end, the Supreme Court was unanimous in its decision and employers in the sector can continue with the practice of paying a flat rate for sleep-in shifts safe in the knowledge that they are not falling foul of the NMW Regulations. However, employers should still take steps to ensure that any time which their sleep-in workers spend awake for the purposes of working is remunerated at NMW rates. Employers should also be mindful of the distinction between sleep-in shifts and on-call arrangements (e.g. where a worker is required to be at the workplace outside of normal working hours with the expectation that he or she will be required to work) as the latter would attract NMW.
Contact
Mark Hickson
Head of Business Development
onlineteaminbox@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)370 270 6000
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Autumn statement 2023 – key take outs for employers
Training - Shared Insights
Giving evidence at a Coroner’s inquest – guidance for clinical witnesses
Opinion
Collective bargaining rights
Legal Update
ICO consultation on transparency in health and social care
Published Article
PureHealth acquisition of Circle Health reflects growing opportunities between UK and Middle East
In Person Event
Mock Employment Tribunal
Opinion
Cross-sector collaboration and civic leadership: round table insight
Legal Update
Failure to prevent fraud: how can my organisation prepare?
Opinion
Agency cover and strike action
On-Demand
Provider Selection Regime – change is coming, what does it mean for you?
Published Article
Infrastructure and social value in public contracts – making it concrete
Opinion
Updates in equality – An overview of new regulations
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared insights: The challenges caused by disordered eating in education, health and social care settings
Opinion
Minimum Service Levels and reasonable steps – consultation response
Online Event
Data Shared Insights: Subject access requests
Legal Update
Holiday entitlement and pay: Reforms ahead
Legal Update
CQC State of Care report 2022/23 – what does it say about mental health care and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards?
Legal Update
A positive duty to prevent sexual harassment
Legal Update
Can a care provider be compelled to deliver care that it considers unsafe or is unwilling to provide?
Legal Update - Health and Care Connect
Health and Care Connect: Health Check - October 2023
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Care Fertility Group on acquisition of CRGW
Online Event - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners Question Time
Legal Update
Roundtable report - Community Diagnostic Centres
Legal Update
The season of goodwill: what education charities need to know
Legal Update
Update on the implementation of the CQC’s Single Assessment Framework
Legal Update
The FPPT framework – New Guidance and what NHS organisations need to know
Legal Update
Older People’s Housing Taskforce – progress update
Opinion
Bonus clawback provisions: Clear and reasonable
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Improving communication with patients and families when responding to incidents, complaints and claims
Opinion
Third party intervention did not break the chain of causation in whistleblowing detriment claim
Opinion
Holiday pay claims: A series of deductions
Opinion
Monitoring workers – ICO guidance
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Racial disparities in healthcare and the role of health technology in improving equity, increasing patient safety and reducing claims
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill: Competitive flexible procedure, how will this work in practice?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson strengthens employment team with key partner hire
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill - Are they still playing ping-pong?
Legal Update
Greater predictability over terms for workers
Published Article
InLaw: the start of the EPR convergence journey
Legal Update
ICO consultation on fertility tracking apps
