Job Retention Scheme further information – 14 April 2020
Following on from our initial briefing note on the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme published on 24 March 2020, the Government has now released further details about the Scheme and how it will operate.
Please note: the information contained in our legal updates are correct as of the original date of publication
Following on from our initial briefing note on the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme published on 24 March 2020, the Government has now released further details about the Scheme and how it will operate.
The updated guidance can be found here.
This goes into much more detail than the previous guidance and answers a number of questions for employers and employees alike. This briefing note should be read in conjunction with the above guidance and our previous briefing note.
- The scheme is expected go live at the end of April and will run for an initial period of three months, starting from 1 March. Under the scheme, employers can be reimbursed for wage costs for furloughed workers from 1 March 2020 until the scheme is launched. Claims for future wages will be paid by way of a grant from HMRC directly to the employer, to be used to pay the wages of furloughed employees.
- The minimum period of time for furlough is three weeks.
- The definition of “employee” has been confirmed as including full time and part time employees, employees on agency contracts and employees on flexible or zero hours contracts. The revised guidance has confirmed that “limb (b) workers” (i.e. those who perform work personally but who are not employees) are covered by the scheme as long as their wages are processed through PAYE. This was not clear in the earlier guidance. Anyone who accounts for their own taxes will need to claim under the parallel self-employed scheme. The rules also set out how employers should calculate the amount they claim for each employee based on whether they receive a fixed salary or variable pay.
- The new guidance clarifies the position in respect of employees who have left their employment (whether by reason of redundancy or otherwise) since 1 March 2020 and confirms that these employees will be eligible for the scheme if they are rehired by the employer and designated as furloughed. It is important for employers to remember that it is not compulsory for the employer to rehire, and care should be taken with this decision. Employers will need to balance the potential negative publicity that could arise as a result of not rehiring an employee who would otherwise remain jobless, against the risks that may arise as a result of doing so (including the fact that once the scheme is wound up, that individual will remain an employee of the business even though there may no longer be a role for them).
- It does not appear that the employer needs to be contemplating redundancies in order to claim under the scheme. Whilst the aim is to help employers seriously affected by coronavirus to retain employees and protect the economy, the guidance stresses that all employers are eligible to claim and recognises that businesses will face different impacts. Further, the guidance now explicitly states that shielding employees, and those unable to work for childcare reasons are eligible for furlough.
- It has been confirmed that employers will need to seek agreement from staff to vary their contracts to allow for furloughing. Although there is reference to collective consultation potentially be necessary to procure agreement to contractual changes, it remains unclear as to precisely when collective consultation would need to be engaged. Given the intention behind the scheme is to provide immediate assistance to employers of all sizes, it would be counterintuitive to expect employers to carry out a lengthy consultation process before they could access the scheme. Further clarity is needed on this point and we would advise that employers who propose to furlough 20 or more employees to contact us for advice on their specific situation. It may also be that there are collective agreements in place for some workplaces which require consultation on changes to terms and conditions.
- The new guidance confirms that when selecting employees to be furloughed, employers must be sure not to discriminate against any individual employee or group of employees. Part time workers will also be protected from less favourable treatment compared to their full-time colleagues. Decisions on which employees to furlough should therefore be capable of being objectively justifiable on the grounds of furthering a legitimate aim i.e. the continuation of the business and the retention of jobs. It is important to note that employees hired after 28 February 2020 are not eligible for the scheme.
- Whilst employees are not able to carry out any work whilst they are on furlough, they can carry out training. If, however, they are asked to do this, then employers must ensure that they are paid the National Minimum Wage/National Living Wage for the time spent training and this may require the employer to top up the 80% that is subsidised.
- The government has confirmed that grants to employers under the scheme will cover a) the lower of 80% of an employee’s regular wage or £2,500 per month, b) the associated Employer National Insurance contributions and c) the minimum automatic enrolment employer pension contributions on that subsidised wage. Fees, commission and bonuses should not be included. Further guidance is awaited on how employers should calculate claims for NICs and pension contributions before the scheme goes live. The sums paid to employees should be taxed in the usual way.
- Employers (whether in the private or public sector) which are receiving public funds to cover staff costs should not be making use of the furlough scheme if those funds are continuing.
- For employees on fixed term contracts, employers can only recover up to the end of the contract. However, the guidance does state that contracts can be renewed or extended without breaking the terms of the furlough scheme. It is unclear whether there is an exception to the minimum three-week rule for fixed term contracts that end. It would potentially be safer to extend to allow for a minimum of three weeks but this will need to be considered on a case by case basis (for example, this may not be appropriate if the employee is approaching 2 years’ service).
- Employees who have been furloughed retain all of their employment rights, including the right to statutory payments and rights against unfair dismissal. The guidance includes specific information in respect of employees on maternity leave, unpaid leave or statutory sick pay. The guidance also confirms that non-monetary benefits in kind cannot be included in the reference salary but should still be provided. It is silent on monetary benefits. Our view is that monetary benefits such as a car allowance which is paid every month should fall within the ambit of the scheme. The guidance also explicitly states that benefits which are provided through a salary sacrifice and reduce an employee’s taxable pay should not be included in the reference salary. It also states where an employer provides benefits this should be in addition to the wages that must be paid. It is not possible to pay the employee less than the grant (save for deductions of tax and NI).
- There is nothing in the guidance covering the issue of annual leave whilst on furlough. Based on guidance from ACAS, it would appear that holiday will not break furlough and this should allow employers to claim the 80% (under the scheme calculation) in respect of a day’s leave. Employers may then need to top up this pay to ensure the rules around the calculation of holiday pay are adhered to. There is also nothing in the guidance preventing employers from requiring employees to take annual leave whilst on furlough.
Given the nature of the situation that employers find themselves in, our view is that employment tribunals are likely to be sympathetic to employers in the event of any claims arising out of the furloughing of workers, and should take a more flexible approach than might otherwise have been the case. This does not mean that employers should not have regard to all of their obligations towards their employees when considering using the scheme, and we would advise clients to ensure they are retaining evidence to show why they took a certain course of action and how they implemented the scheme within their workforce, including in terms of communications with the workforce and any consultation that took place.
Finally, no further guidance has been given on how the scheme will be policed and we repeat our previous guidance that monitoring of compliance with scheme rules may be done retrospectively, and employers should therefore be sure to keep an audit trail that shows that the use of the scheme was appropriate and necessary to prevent redundancies attributable to this crisis.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Gender pay gap reporting – what are my obligations?
Opinion
Employment claims: the new rates and limits from 6 April 2023
Opinion
Plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce approved by government
Opinion
Increase to 20 hour limit on supplementary employment for Health and Care Worker visa holders
Article
New report highlights risk of sidelining ED&I in school trusts
Opinion
Mopping up after a leak – how businesses can take steps to protect their confidential information
Online Event
Wellbeing and financial considerations – practical solutions for challenging times
Press Release
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
Legal Update
Teacher strikes – lessons learnt so far
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
On-Demand
Employment update webinar
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Opinion
Fire and re-hire – draft statutory code
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
Opinion
Consultation on holiday entitlement – part-year and irregular workers
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Opinion
Twitter facing employment claims following mass redundancies
News that Twitter is being threatened with multiple claims by UK employees following mass redundancies provides a reminder of the risks that comes with an employer implementing large scale redundancy exercises.Legal Update
Industrial Action and Minimum Service Levels
Legal Update
Discrimination comes of age
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Opinion
Rising Employment Tribunal backlog
Legal Update
Official statistics demonstrate a new wave of age discrimination claims
Opinion
Menopause and the NHS workforce addressing the female brain drain…
Opinion
4-day working week a success?
The Covid-19 pandemic drastically changed the world’s way of working, with increased flexibility being greatly desired by employees. Earlier on in the year, a number of organisations trialled the concept of a 4-day working week – which has clearly been a success for many.Legal Update
Coming of age
Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021.
Published Article
Starling Bank employment tribunal
The outcome of the Employment Tribunal claim brought by Gulnaz Raja against Starling Bank Limited (1) (Starling), and Matthew Newman (2) was reported last month.
Published Article
EU banks show slow progress on gender diversity
Opinion
Rising wages ahead
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Opinion
World Cup 2022 – how employers can avoid scoring an own goal!
The World Cup kicks off in Qatar on Sunday 20 November 2022, with the final taking place on Sunday 18 December 2022. Undoubtedly, this is a huge sporting event, and many employees will be keen to show their support for their favourite teams. However, due to the time difference, start times for the matches are between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. UK time, which could have an impact on employers if employees who wish to watch the matches are scheduled to work.
Legal Update
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations?
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
Legal Update
The Starling Bank disability discrimination decision
Opinion
The vanishing dismissal
Where an employee appeals against their dismissal under a contractual appeal procedure and their appeal is successful, reinstatement to their previous role is automatic and does not require approval or agreement from the employee.
Opinion
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations post Bathgate?
Settlement agreements in an employment context are ordinarily used to provide both parties with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship – but what happens when there is alleged discrimination after entering into a settlement agreement?
Legal Update
IR35 rules here to stay after government U-turn
A few weeks ago we brought you news that following the Government’s mini-budget it was confirmed that the off-payroll working rules (known as “IR35”) put in place for public and private sector businesses from 2017 and 2021 would be scrapped from April 2023.
Legal Update
Redundancy consultation and selection concerning expiry of a fixed term contract – EAT put the spotlight onto a ‘selection pool of one’
In Mogane v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether it was fair to dismiss a nurse as redundant on the basis that that her fixed-term contract was due to expire before that of her colleague.