Where a start-up or SME company is looking for external investment, and one or more individuals are looking for investment opportunities which can provide significant tax advantages, it is well worth considering the Enterprise Investment Scheme (“EIS”) or the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (“SEIS”).
Where a start-up or SME company is looking for external investment, and one or more individuals are looking for investment opportunities which can provide significant tax advantages, it is well worth considering the Enterprise Investment Scheme (“EIS”) or the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (“SEIS”).
Both EIS and SEIS are arrangements approved by HM Revenue & Customs, and so can offer tax advantages to the investor without using aggressive tax planning. We have set out some initial questions to help in considering if EIS or SEIS may work for you, and some initial points to note about both schemes, as follows:
An individual subscribing in cash for ordinary shares in a UK private company or an AIM listed company, but which isn’t listed on the Stock Exchange.
Usually for at least 3 years, to get the tax advantages.
They include:
An individual:
The company qualifying conditions include the following:
Yes, for both EIS and SEIS; the company can also apply to HMRC for advance assurance, prior to the investment, that it will satisfy the company qualifying conditions.
There are some disqualifying trigger events set out in the legislation which can lead to a clawback or loss of the tax reliefs for the investor. These should be monitored during the qualifying period of share ownership.
We have set out a comparison by way of brief headlines on some of the key points on the tax reliefs and qualifying conditions for EIS and SEIS in the table below. If you would like further details or advice, please contact us.
|
Some Key Points to Note |
EIS |
SEIS |
|
Income Tax Relief |
• Relief against income tax liability for 30% of amount invested |
• Relief against income tax liability for 50% of amount invested |
|
CGT Relief |
• CGT free disposal of qualifying EIS shares |
• As per EIS |
|
CGT Reinvestment Relief |
• CGT deferred where gain re-invested in qualifying EIS shares |
• CGT exemption where gain re-invested into SEIS shares in same tax year |
|
How much can be invested per tax year? |
• £1M max* per person |
• £100k max per person |
|
Any cap on size of the company (including group companies)? |
• Gross assets £15M/£16M max immediately before/after investment • Fewer than 250 employees*, at date of investment |
• Gross assets £200k max immediately before investment • Fewer than 25 employees, at date of investment |
|
Who can invest? |
• Can’t be an employee • Can be an “unpaid” or “business angel” director post-investment • Mustn’t have more than 30% of shares, voting rights, or certain economic rights in the company |
• Can’t be an employee • Can be a director • As per EIS |
|
What type of company can you invest in? |
• UK trading company or holding company of trading group • List of 18 categories of ‘excluded activities’ – must check • Must not be controlled by another company |
• As per the points for EIS, plus… • Any trade must be less than 2 years old at date of investment • Must not have carried on any trade other than the new trade |
|
Can there be EIS and SEIS in the same company? |
• Can claim EIS after a SEIS investment in same company |
• Can’t claim SEIS after an EIS (or VCT) investment in same company |
|
Can relief be withdrawn later? How long should the shares be held for? |
• Yes; check various disqualifying events • Broadly speaking hold shares for at least 3 years for tax reliefs |
• As per EIS • As per EIS |
* more generous caps for a ‘knowledge intensive company’
In this session, we examined the legal framework around grant funded collaborations and discussed the key risks to be aware of, including IP ownership and compliance with grant terms.
Below are some of the questions we are regularly asked by startups, covering a range of topic areas.
Bishopsgate Corporate Finance and law firm Browne Jacobson have jointly advised on the acquisition of award-winning tech solutions business, Custard Technical Services by US managers services and cyber security provider, Thrive.
National law firm Browne Jacobson has advised long standing retail client, Wilko on the sale and leaseback of its Nottinghamshire distribution centre in Worksop to logistics specialist DHL for £48m.
The war on plastic is being taken to a new level, and businesses that don’t consider sourcing recycled packaging materials could face costly implications.
Law firm Browne Jacobson has appointed former Vice President and Chief Planning Officer (CPO) of Aston Martin Lagonda, Nikki Rimmington as its first Non-Executive Director (NED) of its Manufacturing & Industrials sector strategy board.
In a judgment handed down yesterday the Supreme Court has affirmed that a so called “creditor duty” exists for directors such that in some circumstances company directors are required to act in accordance with, or to consider the interests of creditors. Those circumstances potentially arise when a company is insolvent or where there is a “probability” of an insolvency. We explore below the “trigger” for such a test to apply and its implications.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
Browne Jacobson’s corporate technology dealmakers have advised Agilico, a workplace technology business, on its acquisition of Capital Document Solutions Limited for an undisclosed amount.
Browne Jacobson’s lawyers have advised Suez SA and its shareholders on its acquisition of its former UK waste management business – Suez R&R UK - from French headquartered business Veolia for an enterprise value of £2 billion.
The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the BTI v Sequana appeal and reviewed the existence, content and engagement of the so-called ‘creditor duty’; being the point at which the interest of creditors is said to intrude upon the decision-making of directors of companies in financial distress.
It was reported in May 2022 that the BMW-owned manufacturer had been forced to put a temporary stop on the production of all manual transmission vehicles due to the global semi-conductor shortage and the war in Ukraine. Mini stated that the move was made in order to "ensure production stability".
Browne Jacobson has bolstered its commercial practice in the UK with the appointment of commercial contracts and international trade specialist, Emma Roake, into its City-based London team.
Browne Jacobson’s national private equity (PE) lawyers have advised leading mid-market PE investment firm, Palatine Private Equity (Palatine) on its exit from CTS Group, the fast-growing specialist in testing, inspection and geoengineering consulting services to the construction and infrastructure sectors.
Browne Jacobson’s corporate finance lawyers have advised leading mid-market private equity firm, LDC and management on the sale of specialist managed IT services provider, Littlefish to Bowmark Capital.
The Digital Markets Act (the “DMA”) joins the dots between competition law and data protection law and actively targets data-driven platforms. It is also a comprehensive regulation to take note of, with familiar GDPR-style fines tied to turnover.
Browne Jacobson’s private equity (PE) dealmakers have advised Palatine Private Equity backed CTS Group (Construction Testing Solutions Limited) on its acquisition of In Situ Site Investigation, a market leader in Cone Penetration Testing and Pressuremeter techniques and ground investigation services.
Browne Jacobson’s corporate finance lawyers have advised leading private equity investor, Rcapital Partners LLP (Rcapital) on its majority stake acquisition of managing general agents (MGAs), UK General Insurance Ltd (UKG) and Precision Partnership Limited (PPL) alongside Montague Investment Group LLP who are taking a minority stake.
In an unreported case (Re Active Wear Limited (in Administration)), the High Court has ruled that an out-of-court administration appointment, instigated by a sole director of a company with unmodified model articles, was valid notwithstanding the earlier decision of Deputy Judge Farnhill (also in the High Court) in the case Hashmi v Lorimer-Wing (also known as Re Fore Fitness Investments Holdings Ltd) [2022] EWHC 191 (Ch) (02 February 2022).
Rolls-Royce has shortlisted six locations for its first factory for small nuclear power stations. We look at the impact on regions & local businesses
There are clearly challenging macro-economic factors at play but at Browne Jacobson we continue to see good levels of transactional activity with certain sectors being particularly buoyant: healthcare, financial services, energy & infrastructure and tech.
The Court of Appeal has dismissed two cases regarding rent arrears accrued during the Covid lockdowns. The cases are London Trocadero (2015) LLP v Picturehouse Cinemas Ltd and Bank of New York Mellon (International) Ltd v Cine-UK Ltd.
Browne Jacobson’s corporate lawyers have successfully advised the shareholders of specialist chemical manufacturer, Amity International on its acquisition by Belimed AG, a subsidiary of Metall Zug AG.
In the recent case of Dwyer (UK Franchising) Limited v Fredbar Limited and ano’r [2022] EWCA Civ 889, the Court of Appeal considered the reasonableness of restrictive covenants in a franchise agreement.
