Beauty Industry - Plastic Packaging Tax
The war on plastic is being taken to a new level, and businesses that don’t consider sourcing recycled packaging materials could face costly implications.
The war on plastic is being taken to a new level, and businesses that don’t consider sourcing recycled packaging materials could face costly implications.
The Government’s complicated new plastic packaging tax, which applies from 1 April 2022, provides another reason to start looking at alternative packaging materials. Current demand for those materials is however causing price rises and potentially deterring the switch. If you need to include certain information about your products on your packaging by law, you now need to balance the legal, financial, and environmental implications.
The Government has issued detailed guidance, which can be found here: Plastic Packaging Tax.

Diagram of how plastic tax is calculated
What should you be doing?
To comply with the law, you should:
- Submit quarterly tax returns, providing detailed information regarding your use of plastic packaging (all businesses that meet the threshold for registration will need to do so, regardless of whether any tax is due under the new rules).
- Put in place training, systems, and processes to ensure that you can adapt to the new requirements.
- Review your existing contractual arrangements to determine if they have the flexibility to consider any changes to the tax and allow for an appropriate level of monitoring to ensure compliance with the new rules. If not, consider varying the agreements to take these requirements into account.
- Ensure all new contracts contain appropriate rights and obligations to guarantee and monitor compliance with the rules and that the pricing mechanisms take account of any associated costs.
The new rules also mean that you can be held responsible if you know or should have known that a company in your supply chain has failed to pay the tax due. Lots of businesses are re-evaluating their supply chains at the moment and an added level of due diligence should be built in to that process. Brands will need to be clear about what materials are used in the packaging of products and who in the supply chain is responsible for payment of the associated tax.
The Government has also issued detailed guidance around the level of due diligence that brands should consider, which can be found here: How to make due diligence checks for Plastic Packaging Tax.
Alongside increased consumer scrutiny of brands’ green practices, the new measures will likely continue to drive businesses to consider alternative materials to plastic packaging.
This in turn is driving up the price of alternative materials, to the extent where some businesses are left to consider whether it would be more cost-effective to simply accept the tax and continue with business as usual. The concern is that this will lead to substantial price increases, effectively passing the cost of the new tax to the consumer. Some businesses have taken steps to reduce the amount of packaging they use altogether, including M&S who recently stopped providing hangers with orders for underwear (which would be considered packaging under the new regulations) in an attempt to reduce plastic waste.
Smaller businesses that are less able to adapt are also likely to be disproportionately affected by the administrative burden that comes with the new rules. Larger businesses may have the resources and capability to introduce monitoring and reporting systems required to document the use and production of plastic packaging, while for some businesses, this will require a major operational overhaul.
When the single-use plastic carrier bag charge was first introduced in the UK in 2015, the initial concern was that smaller retailers would struggle to meet their administrative obligations under the regulations. However, the measures have seen retailers’ use of single-use carrier bags drop by around 97% since they were introduced. The UK Government will be hoping that this new measure has a similar effect and encourages businesses to move away from non-recycled plastic packaging, while not proving to be too much of an administrative challenge for businesses of all sizes.
Innovation and collaboration across industries are likely to be the most effective way that brands can work together to move towards alternative materials while making sure manufacturers and suppliers are making recycled plastics and alternatives available at a competitive price. Such collaboration has already been seen in certain industries - towards the end of last year Henkle, L’Oreal, LVMH, Natura & Co and Unilever announced the launch of an industry-wide environmental scoring system for cosmetic products aimed at creating greater transparency around the environmental impact of goods.
Further collaborations of this nature which incentivise manufacturers to use less virgin plastic in packaging products and reduce some of the administrative burden associated with carrying out supply chain-wide due diligence are likely to be one of the most effective ways brands may come together to minimise the impact of the tax.
The impact on the fashion and beauty industries
Both the fashion and beauty industries have traditionally been heavily reliant on plastics and, as acknowledged by the British Beauty Council, the rules will pose a real challenge to producers and manufacturers. Aside from the general shortage of recycled plastics available across all industries, the beauty industry may also face difficulty adapting to the new rules due to other regulatory requirements that beauty brands are already subject to.
The EU Cosmetics Regulation sets out the labelling, packaging and safety requirements for cosmetic products being placed on the EU market. Following the end of the Brexit transition period, the regulations were retained in UK law in the form of the UK Cosmetics Regulation. There are various requirements under the regulation, including the need for brands to designate a ‘responsible person’ to ensure product safety and compliance. Brands selling in the EU and the UK will need to appoint a responsible person for both markets and identify that person on the labelling of their cosmetic products. There are also restrictions on the use of certain substances and nanomaterials in cosmetic products.
The Government is currently considering which laws and regulations retained following Brexit will continue to apply in the UK in the long term (including the Cosmetic Regulations). This may have an impact on the ongoing regulatory requirements of fashion and beauty brands, and is something brand owners should keep a close eye on.
With the regulatory landscape in the beauty industry continuing to change, it will be a challenge for brands to continue to comply and adapt. Despite progress concerning the recyclability of plastic materials, there are still doubts as to whether currently available plastic materials are of a high enough standard to meet the requirements to package cosmetic products under the Cosmetics Regulations.
Expertise
You may be interested in...
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Cubo on investment to support expansion
Legal Update
Back in the (Investment) Zone… sort of
Legal Update
Solar panel projects for higher education institutions
Legal Update - ESG in 3D
ESG in 3D - April 2023 (Edition 2)
Legal Update
Climate risk capital – a warning to insurers from the Bank of England
Legal Update
Pitfalls for retailers to avoid when offering access to ‘buy now, pay later’ products
Legal Update
BNG update – BNG and tax implications: Government call for evidence
Opinion
Biodiversity Net Gain - Government publishes its metric consultation response & Natural England publishes their update biodiversity metric 4.0
Published Article
ClientEarth claim may expand scope of directors' duties
Press Release
Law firm Browne Jacobson appointed to work alongside the Government Legal Department - the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - February 2023
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain — Government publishes consultation response
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
Legal Update
Court of Appeal considers ‘proximate cause’ for Pollution or Contamination exclusion in All Risks policy
Legal Update
California bomb cyclone set to ‘to exceed $1bn’ in storm damage costs
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - January 2023
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Natural England on investigation of ‘first in its kind’ sentenced Devon farmer
Published Article
What are freeports and what benefits could they offer?
Published Article
How the Environment Act affects existing contracts’
Guide
FAQs - converting to academy status
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
Driving positive change through investment: a corporate associate advising in the energy sector
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain: positive for nature and an opportunity for landowners
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - EV charging points: contractual and liability issues to be aware of
Legal Update
Updated Greening Government Commitments 2021 – 2025 published
Legal Update - ESG in 3D
ESG in 3D, December 2022
Legal Update
COP15: The most important unknown summit?
Legal Update
Long live king coal?
Legal Update
Voluntary offset markets for carbon – a bad atmosphere?
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
Browne Jacobson helps the Civil Aviation Authority take off with its modernisation masterplan
Legal Update
COP27 – what can we expect?
Legal Update
Beauty Industry - Plastic Packaging Tax
The war on plastic is being taken to a new level, and businesses that don’t consider sourcing recycled packaging materials could face costly implications.
Legal Update
Is this the end for free returns?
Earlier in the year a number of fashion retailers, boldly announced the introduction of a charging fee for returning any product purchased via their online store. Yet, despite this commercial, and perhaps somewhat controversial decision, at least one major fashion giant that adopted this approach has recorded ‘historic highs’ in its September profits. Browne Jacobson partner, Cat Driscoll who heads up the firm’s commercial team in Manchester and is also head of its Fashion & Beauty sector discusses whether this change has put the average consumer off and whether the days of free returns are long gone.
Published Article
AI generated designs on retail products
Every AI will have its own terms of use. DALL·E 2’s Terms of Use dated 3 November 2022 specify that as between a user and Open AI, a user owns their prompts and uploads. Open AI also assigns to the user all rights in any images generated by DALL·E 2 for that user (subject to the user complying with those Terms of Use, and to a licence to use inputs and output to develop and improve the services).
Legal Update
Floating offshore wind pipeline potential
Legal Update
Lloyds becomes first UK bank to halt new oil and gas funding
Legal Update
Environmental Act 2021 – statutory requirement to submit targets not complied with
Published Article
Luxury brands and sustainability – The challenges and solutions
Legal Update
The Retained EU Law
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).