The war on plastic is being taken to a new level, and businesses that don’t consider sourcing recycled packaging materials could face costly implications.
The war on plastic is being taken to a new level, and businesses that don’t consider sourcing recycled packaging materials could face costly implications.
The Government’s complicated new plastic packaging tax, which applies from 1 April 2022, provides another reason to start looking at alternative packaging materials. Current demand for those materials is however causing price rises and potentially deterring the switch. If you need to include certain information about your products on your packaging by law, you now need to balance the legal, financial, and environmental implications.
The Government has issued detailed guidance, which can be found here: Plastic Packaging Tax.
Diagram of how plastic tax is calculated
To comply with the law, you should:
The new rules also mean that you can be held responsible if you know or should have known that a company in your supply chain has failed to pay the tax due. Lots of businesses are re-evaluating their supply chains at the moment and an added level of due diligence should be built in to that process. Brands will need to be clear about what materials are used in the packaging of products and who in the supply chain is responsible for payment of the associated tax.
The Government has also issued detailed guidance around the level of due diligence that brands should consider, which can be found here: How to make due diligence checks for Plastic Packaging Tax.
Alongside increased consumer scrutiny of brands’ green practices, the new measures will likely continue to drive businesses to consider alternative materials to plastic packaging.
This in turn is driving up the price of alternative materials, to the extent where some businesses are left to consider whether it would be more cost-effective to simply accept the tax and continue with business as usual. The concern is that this will lead to substantial price increases, effectively passing the cost of the new tax to the consumer. Some businesses have taken steps to reduce the amount of packaging they use altogether, including M&S who recently stopped providing hangers with orders for underwear (which would be considered packaging under the new regulations) in an attempt to reduce plastic waste.
Smaller businesses that are less able to adapt are also likely to be disproportionately affected by the administrative burden that comes with the new rules. Larger businesses may have the resources and capability to introduce monitoring and reporting systems required to document the use and production of plastic packaging, while for some businesses, this will require a major operational overhaul.
When the single-use plastic carrier bag charge was first introduced in the UK in 2015, the initial concern was that smaller retailers would struggle to meet their administrative obligations under the regulations. However, the measures have seen retailers’ use of single-use carrier bags drop by around 97% since they were introduced. The UK Government will be hoping that this new measure has a similar effect and encourages businesses to move away from non-recycled plastic packaging, while not proving to be too much of an administrative challenge for businesses of all sizes.
Innovation and collaboration across industries are likely to be the most effective way that brands can work together to move towards alternative materials while making sure manufacturers and suppliers are making recycled plastics and alternatives available at a competitive price. Such collaboration has already been seen in certain industries - towards the end of last year Henkle, L’Oreal, LVMH, Natura & Co and Unilever announced the launch of an industry-wide environmental scoring system for cosmetic products aimed at creating greater transparency around the environmental impact of goods.
Further collaborations of this nature which incentivise manufacturers to use less virgin plastic in packaging products and reduce some of the administrative burden associated with carrying out supply chain-wide due diligence are likely to be one of the most effective ways brands may come together to minimise the impact of the tax.
Both the fashion and beauty industries have traditionally been heavily reliant on plastics and, as acknowledged by the British Beauty Council, the rules will pose a real challenge to producers and manufacturers. Aside from the general shortage of recycled plastics available across all industries, the beauty industry may also face difficulty adapting to the new rules due to other regulatory requirements that beauty brands are already subject to.
The EU Cosmetics Regulation sets out the labelling, packaging and safety requirements for cosmetic products being placed on the EU market. Following the end of the Brexit transition period, the regulations were retained in UK law in the form of the UK Cosmetics Regulation. There are various requirements under the regulation, including the need for brands to designate a ‘responsible person’ to ensure product safety and compliance. Brands selling in the EU and the UK will need to appoint a responsible person for both markets and identify that person on the labelling of their cosmetic products. There are also restrictions on the use of certain substances and nanomaterials in cosmetic products.
The Government is currently considering which laws and regulations retained following Brexit will continue to apply in the UK in the long term (including the Cosmetic Regulations). This may have an impact on the ongoing regulatory requirements of fashion and beauty brands, and is something brand owners should keep a close eye on.
With the regulatory landscape in the beauty industry continuing to change, it will be a challenge for brands to continue to comply and adapt. Despite progress concerning the recyclability of plastic materials, there are still doubts as to whether currently available plastic materials are of a high enough standard to meet the requirements to package cosmetic products under the Cosmetics Regulations.
The war on plastic is being taken to a new level, and businesses that don’t consider sourcing recycled packaging materials could face costly implications.
Earlier in the year a number of fashion retailers, boldly announced the introduction of a charging fee for returning any product purchased via their online store. Yet, despite this commercial, and perhaps somewhat controversial decision, at least one major fashion giant that adopted this approach has recorded ‘historic highs’ in its September profits. Browne Jacobson partner, Cat Driscoll who heads up the firm’s commercial team in Manchester and is also head of its Fashion & Beauty sector discusses whether this change has put the average consumer off and whether the days of free returns are long gone.
Every AI will have its own terms of use. DALL·E 2’s Terms of Use dated 3 November 2022 specify that as between a user and Open AI, a user owns their prompts and uploads. Open AI also assigns to the user all rights in any images generated by DALL·E 2 for that user (subject to the user complying with those Terms of Use, and to a licence to use inputs and output to develop and improve the services).
The fashion industry has a mountain to climb when it comes to sustainability. More than 8% of greenhouse gas emissions come from the apparel and footwear industries, and approaching three-fifths of all clothing ends up in incinerators or landfill within a year of being made.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
The Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) has published a consultation on proposals to require Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) administering authorities (AAs) in England and Wales to assess, manage and report on climate change risks.
Browne Jacobson’s specialist cleantech lawyers have advised AIM listed Clean Power Hydrogen Group Limited (CPH2) on its licence agreement with Bentec GmbH, a member of the Kenera business of the KCA Deutag Group. Kenera will manufacture CPH2’s unique membrane-free electrolysers from its facility in Bad Bentheim, Germany.
Browne Jacobson’s private equity (PE) dealmakers have advised Palatine Private Equity backed CTS Group (Construction Testing Solutions Limited) on its latest acquisition of Concept Engineering Consultants Limited, a leader in geotechnical, structural and geo-environmental services for an undisclosed amount.
Rolls-Royce has shortlisted six locations for its first factory for small nuclear power stations. We look at the impact on regions & local businesses
Today the High Court has declared that the Government’s Net Zero Strategy is unlawful, as it doesn’t explain how the targets will be met. The decision follows similar decisions in other countries and reflects a growing willingness to consider and rule on climate-change-related claims in court.
Browne Jacobson’s specialist cleantech lawyers have advised AIM market listed Clean Power Hydrogen Group Limited (CPH2) on its global licence agreement with GHFG Ltd.
A Senedd committee has made a significant intervention in relation to post-Brexit environmental protection arrangements in Wales.
Conservation Covenants come into force on 30 September 2022. We look at the impact on landowners, developers and responsible bodies.
Shell shareholders have outlined their intention to bring a claim against Shell directors for failing to properly prepare the company for net zero.
Homes England, the government’s housing accelerator, has partnered with two local authorities, Greater Manchester Combined Authority and the Association of South Essex Local Authorities, in a new Strategic Place Partnership (SPP) which is designed to align with the government’s levelling up agenda by delivering new homes in the regions.
Climate change could result in local authorities seeing an increase in claims from the employees and the public. In this article, we share our top 10 tips for mitigating the risk of claims.
This article covers, at a high level, some of the legal issues that arise in the lifecycle of the innovation and deployment of new technology within the energy sector. It is not intended to be a comprehensive account of all legal aspects.
Today, (Thursday 16 June) 18 trainee lawyers from Browne Jacobson began the second of three planned “going green” fundraising challenges which focus on driving positive change to the environment and will raise essential funds for the firm’s charity partners.
First Hydrogen has identified 4 sites in the UK where it plans to locate large hydrogen refuelling stations for commercial vehicles. The sites will also accommodate on-site hydrogen production of between 20 and 40 MW (totalling 80 MW - 160 MW across all 4 locations) and will serve the urban areas of Greater Liverpool, Greater Manchester, London and the Thames Estuary. The plans form part of the Energy division’s strategy to develop green hydrogen production projects, initially in the UK and Canada.
The climate emergency has reached a point where real and substantial damage is being caused to both the planet and society. There has been a shift from planning and theorising the most effective solutions, to a phase where practical, efficient, and sustainable solutions are required at speed.
National law firm Browne Jacobson has launched an electric vehicle (EV) scheme as part of its employee benefits package. The benefit will be available to all of the firm’s employees across its five offices, including Birmingham, Exeter, London, Manchester, and Nottingham.
Browne Jacobson’s trainee lawyers are gearing up for the first of three outdoor fundraising challenges that will begin this weekend (Saturday 14 May), with the aim of driving positive change to the environment and raising funds for the firm’s charity partners.
There are a number of factors which have contributed to the crisis including the huge increase in wholesale natural gas prices, which have risen some 250% since the start of 2021. Since the start of last year, over 30 energy firms have gone bust in the UK alone.
