Guest writer, Finch Consulting Senior Consultant Teli Chinelis applies his expertise in preparing engineering reports in relation to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) claims to explain information that is required from the claimant and information that is required and is advisable to be retained by employers, in order to ensure that claims can be fairly represented.
Finch Consulting Senior Consultant Teli Chinelis applies his expertise in preparing engineering reports in relation to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) claims to explain information that is required from the claimant and information that is required and is advisable to be retained by employers, in order to ensure that claims can be fairly represented.
Finch is regarded as one of the leading providers of expert services, including engineering expert witness services, dealing with personal injury claims relating to occupational exposure to noise and vibration, having produced more than 10,000 reports in connection with these claims over the years.
NIHL is hearing loss that is caused by exposure to sound. Hearing damage from noise exposure generally happens gradually, becoming noticeable over a number of years of exposure. But it can also happen very quickly, for example after exposure to noise from impacts or explosions. The damage suffered tends to be permanent.
In the United Kingdom, it is estimated that there are more than 10 million individuals (about 1 in 6) with some degree of hearing impairment or deafness. Over one million workers are exposed to levels of noise that put their hearing at risk, with 17 per cent suffering hearing loss, tinnitus or other hearing-related conditions as a result of exposure to excessive noise at work.
The last decade has seen a significant rise in the number of NIHL claims. By 2010 the insurance industry was reporting over 24,000 claims annually and by early 2015 the reported annual number from the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries was 87,000, although this dropped to 57,000 claims annually by the end of 2015. NIHL numbers fell over 2016, although they are still higher than they were in 2011 and 2012. The expert witnesses at Finch Consulting are almost always fully utilised and have been preparing more than 300 relevant reports annually for the past few years.
Claims used to come from traditional industries such as coal mining, manufacturing and ship building, where the claimant typically worked with the same employer for many years if not his whole working life and sources of noise were well understood. Nowadays we see cases involving claimants who have worked in a much wider range of sectors with multiple employers. The role of the engineering expert witness is crucial in cases involving multiple employments with significant noise exposure in order to calculate the apportionment of the dose between the various employers.
Claimants have to be able to prove their hearing loss occurred at work and provide evidence that the employer has been negligent. Apart from providing estimates of the claimant’s likely daily noise exposure and lifetime noise immission levels the engineering expert (who has experience in risk management) also reviews any actions that the defendant should have taken in light of guidance and (after 1990) the regulations in place during the claimant’s employment.
Employers are legally and morally responsible for controlling noise in the workplace and protecting their employees’ hearing. Loss of hearing is a very serious health and safety issue and insurers do provide compensation for genuine claimants.
The Health and Safety Executive has a valuable guidance on this issue, with a dedicated part of its website on noise (www.hse.gov.uk/noise/) including HSE’s 130 page guidance document L108 (http://www.hse.gov.uk/pUbns/priced/l108.pdf). The Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 in summary require an employer to:
Employers are advised to retain for litigation defence relevant evidence.
Employers are advised to:
It is important to an employer to be able to disclose evidence about the noise management systems.
Considering future NIHL claims when writing current assessment and management documents will give you the best chance of defending these claims as quickly and cost effectively as possible.
The vast majority of the cases where Finch provides its services in occupational noise and vibration claims is on a joint expert basis. The duty of engineering experts is to the Court and the provision or disclosure of relevant information from all parties can be of great assistance in order to provide an objective and unbiased report to the court.
Finch Consulting is a professional services firm specialising in engineering, health and safety and environmental management. Its engineers, specialists, and ex-regulators offer world class advice, investigation, training and representation to its clients in a very wide range of industries, including legal, financial and insurance, food and drink, leisure and entertainment, manufacturing, energy and waste, and defence.
This article is the second in a series to help firms take a practical approach to complying with the ‘cross-cutting rules’ within the new ‘Consumer Duty’ (CD) framework. The article summarises what it seems the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is seeking to achieve from the applicable rules (section 2 below) and potential complications arising from legal considerations (section 3).
Claims arising from interest-only mortgages have been farmed in volume. Many such claims to date have sought to drive a narrative that interest-only mortgages are an inherently toxic product and brokers were negligent simply for suggesting them. Taylor is a helpful recalibration, focussing instead on what the monies raised by the mortgage product were being used for and whether the client understood the inherent risks.
Practice Direction 57AC (“PD57AC”) relates to witness evidence in trials and explicitly applies only to the Business and Property Courts. It applies to existing proceedings in which the witness statements for trial are signed on or after 6 April 2021.
This article is the first in a series aimed to help firms get to grips on a practical basis with the ‘cross-cutting rules’ within the new ‘Consumer Duty’ framework.