Supreme Court decision on Oatly using 'milk': Browne Jacobson comment
Following a decision by the Supreme Court, the drinks manufacturer Oatly has been banned from using the word "milk" to market its plant-based products.
Commenting on the ruling, advertising lawyer Katharine Mason said: “Although this is a trade mark case, the key points rest on the correct interpretation of food law and it’s the first time these points have been assessed in the UK courts. Specifically, the food law that defines specific “designations” which can only be used for food and drink which meets the criteria. The case is all about whether the trade mark “POST MILK GENERATION” was using “milk” as a designation for a non-milk product.
“In essence, milk is defined as “normal mammary secretion” which is of course not how oat-drinks are sourced. The Supreme Court rejected Oatly’s narrow interpretation of “designation” as only applying to the product name and did not consider an exemption applied.
“The ruling has confirmed that if it's not from an animal, you can't call it milk. The word 'milk' in Oatly's trademark term is a protected food term under the law and their oat drinks don't meet the legal definition. As it stands, companies launching plant-based products will need be aware of protected designations, but the future might bring a new generation of designations.”
Contact
Felicity Spencer-Smith
PR & Communications Manager
felicity.spencer-smith@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)3300451376
You may be interested in...
Press Release
Supreme Court decision on Oatly using 'milk': Browne Jacobson comment
Legal Update - IP insights
IP insights: January 2026
Legal Update
Kohler Mira v Norcros: Key lessons in purposive construction for patent drafters
Legal Update
Protecting your brand from 'genericide': Lessons from Dryrobe v D-Robe
Legal Update
Court of Appeal says ‘no’ to co-branding but dismisses copyright claim in AGA conversion case
Legal Update
Rise and shine: The European breakfast directive’s new year transformation
Legal Update - IP insights
IP insights: November 2025
Legal Update
Getty Images’ copyright not infringed by Stability AI making its Stable Diffusion model available to users in the UK
Legal Update - IP insights
IP insights: September 2025
Legal Update - IP insights
IP insights: July 2025
Legal Update
Trade mark dispute risks: AI in legal document drafting
Press Release
Browne Jacobson a ‘discerning choice’ for clients with ‘IP-rich deals and complex litigation’ - as team ranks for both IAM Patent 1000 and IP Stars 2025
Legal Update - IP insights
IP insights: May 2025
Legal Update
Trade mark strategy in a global market
Legal Update
Advertising trends: Influencers, intellectual property and image rights
Legal Update
Metro’s Runs Afowl of Morley’s Marks in the Court of Appeal
Legal Update - IP insights
IP insights: April 2025
Opinion
What’s in a shape? The impact of 3D registered trade marks on glucose monitoring kits
Legal Update
One to watch: Oatly appeals to the UK Supreme Court in continued fight for its trade mark
Press Release
Intellectual property (IP) predictions for 2025
Legal Update
Alcohol charity on the “Naughty List” for attempts to trade mark “DRY JANUARY”
Legal Update
EasyGroup proceedings defeated by jurisdictional challenge
Legal Update
Veganism and manufacturing: IP protection
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
Press Release
Court of Appeal makes plea for legally enforceable arbitration for FRAND disputes
In the ongoing complex litigation between Optis Cellular Technology LLC and Apple Inc., the Court of Appeal ([2022] EWCA Civ 1411) has upheld the High Court’s findings that implementers of standard-essential patents (SEPs) cannot refuse to accept a FRAND license and continue activities in the meantime which constitute infringement: that party must commit to accept a court-determined license if it wishes to avoid an injunction.
Published Article
AI generated designs on retail products
Every AI will have its own terms of use. DALL·E 2’s Terms of Use dated 3 November 2022 specify that as between a user and Open AI, a user owns their prompts and uploads. Open AI also assigns to the user all rights in any images generated by DALL·E 2 for that user (subject to the user complying with those Terms of Use, and to a licence to use inputs and output to develop and improve the services).
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s IP experts shine silver in world’s leading trade mark lawyer rankings
Opinion
Sky’s overly broad trade marks narrowed as found partially invalid for bad faith
Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.
Legal Update
Amazon not liable for merely storing third party’s infringing goods
At a time when Amazon is fielding large spikes in demand amidst the coronavirus pandemic, the online retail platform will welcome the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) received on 2 April 2020.
Legal Update
Domain names as IP rights
On-Demand
How to commercialise your IP: licensing, spin outs and JVs
Our expert panel, comprised of IP and corporate law specialists, will be discussing IP commercialisation strategies, their benefits and pitfalls, drawing on experience across the private, public and higher education sectors.
Published Article
O/281/19 Revocation (Device Marks) – 23 May 2019
This decision is a good example of how the IPO approaches non-use challenges, and an insight into the economics of gift shops at public parks.
On-Demand
Parallel Imports - what brand and IP owners need to know
Parallel importers seek to exploit price differentials for goods sold in different countries. The EU principle of exhaustion of rights prevents businesses from enforcing their IP rights to restrict this secondary trade within the EU if the goods were first marketed in the EU with their consent, other than in limited circumstances.
Legal Update
“Utterly horrified” masters and “blatantly inadmissible” evidence
The sole result for a search on Westlaw for the phrase “utterly horrified” is an interesting decision from Mr Justice Arnold on June 12 2019 about evidence in passing off proceedings.
Press Release
Browne Jacobson scores victory for Wolverhampton Wanderers over badge copyright claim
Browne Jacobson is delighted to have assisted Wolverhampton Wanders Football Club to successfully defend a copyright infringement claim made against it which relates to the club’s iconic wolf head design. The club has used this design as an element of its badge since 1979.