Reaction: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court judgment finds patent infringement based solely on equivalents
The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court has handed down its decision in A Ward Attachments Limited v Fabcon Engineering Limited [2021] EWHC 2145 (IPEC), finding A Ward’s patent to be valid and infringed by Fabcon. National law firm, Browne Jacobson’s patent litigation team successfully represented A Ward. HHJ Melissa Clarke handed down the judgment on 29 July 2021.
The case is notable for a number of reasons. A Ward’s successful infringement claim was unusually run (on the parent patent EP 2 021 268 B1) solely on the basis of the doctrine of equivalents, a concept introduced into English patent law in 2017.
Fabcon’s defence included an ‘estoppel by acquiescence’ argument, based on the historic correspondence between the businesses. The Judge dismissed this defence, and her analysis of the law on acquiescence will be of value to patentees and practitioners alike.
The Browne Jacobson team was headed up by partner and head of the firm’s patent practice, Mark Daniels with senior associate, Nick Smee and associate, Jessica Johnson.
Mark Daniels commented on the outcome: “We are pleased to have assisted our client in achieving a finding of infringement. This case is another example of the courts being willing to find for the patentee on an equivalents basis, where the circumstances merit it. R&D teams conducting freedom to operate reviews would be well advised to explore what it is about the invention that gives the technical expert a “buzz”, and stress test that against what they are proposing to develop.”
New Zealand based A Ward specialises in the provision of multiple loading and unloading solutions to a broad range of industries across the globe including agriculture, chemicals and pharmaceutical, food, minerals, plastics and recycling.
Browne Jacobson’s specialist patent litigation team has a broad range of expertise in enforcement of patents, co-ordination of international patent litigation and dispute resolution, dealing with challenges to the validity of patents, patent entitlement issues, declaratory relief and preliminary injunctions and opinion work.
The judgment can be viewed here.
In the ongoing complex litigation between Optis Cellular Technology LLC and Apple Inc., the Court of Appeal ([2022] EWCA Civ 1411) has upheld the High Court’s findings that implementers of standard-essential patents (SEPs) cannot refuse to accept a FRAND license and continue activities in the meantime which constitute infringement: that party must commit to accept a court-determined license if it wishes to avoid an injunction.
Every AI will have its own terms of use. DALL·E 2’s Terms of Use dated 3 November 2022 specify that as between a user and Open AI, a user owns their prompts and uploads. Open AI also assigns to the user all rights in any images generated by DALL·E 2 for that user (subject to the user complying with those Terms of Use, and to a licence to use inputs and output to develop and improve the services).
A deepfake of Bruce Willis is advertising Russian mobile phones. Many great artistic and metaphysical questions are raised by this performance. However, this article is going to look at the intellectual property law implications, from a UK perspective.
National law firm Browne Jacobson has been ranked again for both its patent litigation and transactional work in the 2022 edition of IAM Patent 1000, the independent guide to the world’s leading patent law firms and practitioners.
Browne Jacobson has extensive experience in advising across all aspect of a HEI’s commercialisation strategy. If you would like to find out more, particularly in relation to spin-ins, please get in touch.
Browne Jacobson’s national IP lawyers are celebrating after being ranked in the 2022 World Trademark Review (WTR) 1000 - the independent guide which recognises leading trade mark experts across key jurisdictions around the globe.
In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.
In July this year, four years to the month after its introduction into UK law in the Supreme Court’s seminal judgment in Actavis v Eli Lilly, the court handed down its latest decision applying the ‘doctrine of equivalents’.
The Court of Appeal has held that an AI machine cannot be named as the ‘inventor’ of a patent, because it is not a ‘natural person’, and is therefore also incapable of transferring the right in that patent to a person.
Browne Jacobson’s national IP team is celebrating after again securing Tier 1 rankings in the East and West Midlands region and maintaining its Tier 3 status in London in the latest edition of Legal 500.
Reaction: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court judgment finds patent infringement based solely on equivalents
The adoption of smart technology solutions by the health and care sector has exploded in 2020. The pandemic has driven the sector to increase its use of smart phone technology solutions (“Apps”), an example of which is conducting video consultations and assessments.
Covid-19 and the challenges associated with it grind on into a second wave. Not only that but there’s the prospect of Brexit and a looming recession ahead. It would be entirely forgivable not to be on top of the law right now. Watch our on-demand video, where we have discussed Brexit and intellectual property and consumer and commercial law changes.
We can how help you understand the potential issues that any changes will have on your business.
Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.
At a time when Amazon is fielding large spikes in demand amidst the coronavirus pandemic, the online retail platform will welcome the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) received on 2 April 2020.
A recent decision by the Supreme Court in Shanks v Unilever PLC has supported the right for employees to receive compensation for patented inventions if the invention is of ‘outstanding benefit’.
Our expert panel, comprised of IP and corporate law specialists, will be discussing IP commercialisation strategies, their benefits and pitfalls, drawing on experience across the private, public and higher education sectors.
Parallel importers seek to exploit price differentials for goods sold in different countries. The EU principle of exhaustion of rights prevents businesses from enforcing their IP rights to restrict this secondary trade within the EU if the goods were first marketed in the EU with their consent, other than in limited circumstances.
The sole result for a search on Westlaw for the phrase “utterly horrified” is an interesting decision from Mr Justice Arnold on June 12 2019 about evidence in passing off proceedings.
After much speculation about what the first fines issued by the Information Commissioners Office might be we have seen two significant statements of intention to fine in the same month
Innovation and creativity is driven by your people. How do you as a business encourage innovation, capture the relevant IP assets and reward your innovators?
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property practice has again been ranked in one of the world's leading guides to intellectual property (IP) firms and practitioners.
The Hiscox Cyber Readiness report, a review of 3300 organisations, will be a stark warning for CEO’s of SME’s in the UK and in Europe.
Browne Jacobson is delighted to have assisted Wolverhampton Wanders Football Club to successfully defend a copyright infringement claim made against it which relates to the club’s iconic wolf head design. The club has used this design as an element of its badge since 1979.
In one of the most significant fraud findings for the NHS, Lesley Elder, 51, was handed a 5-month custodial sentence for contempt of court for dishonestly claiming in excess of £2.3 million in compensation.
As private businesses, public bodies and universities alike strive to gain a competitive advantage, each increasingly look to each other to develop next generation products and services.
In this webinar recording, our experts Mark Daniels and Helen Simm provide you with the key information you need to identify issues relating to the disclosing of documents relevant to litigation, which may have to be disclosed if they are not privileged.
Two of Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property associates Nick Smee and Giles Parsons have been named ‘Rising Stars’ by leading IP publication Managing Intellectual Property.
