Reaction: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court judgment finds patent infringement based solely on equivalents
Reaction: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court judgment finds patent infringement based solely on equivalents
The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court has handed down its decision in A Ward Attachments Limited v Fabcon Engineering Limited [2021] EWHC 2145 (IPEC), finding A Ward’s patent to be valid and infringed by Fabcon. National law firm, Browne Jacobson’s patent litigation team successfully represented A Ward. HHJ Melissa Clarke handed down the judgment on 29 July 2021.
The case is notable for a number of reasons. A Ward’s successful infringement claim was unusually run (on the parent patent EP 2 021 268 B1) solely on the basis of the doctrine of equivalents, a concept introduced into English patent law in 2017.
Fabcon’s defence included an ‘estoppel by acquiescence’ argument, based on the historic correspondence between the businesses. The Judge dismissed this defence, and her analysis of the law on acquiescence will be of value to patentees and practitioners alike.
The Browne Jacobson team was headed up by partner and head of the firm’s patent practice, Mark Daniels with senior associate, Nick Smee and associate, Jessica Johnson.
Mark Daniels commented on the outcome: “We are pleased to have assisted our client in achieving a finding of infringement. This case is another example of the courts being willing to find for the patentee on an equivalents basis, where the circumstances merit it. R&D teams conducting freedom to operate reviews would be well advised to explore what it is about the invention that gives the technical expert a “buzz”, and stress test that against what they are proposing to develop.”
New Zealand based A Ward specialises in the provision of multiple loading and unloading solutions to a broad range of industries across the globe including agriculture, chemicals and pharmaceutical, food, minerals, plastics and recycling.
Browne Jacobson’s specialist patent litigation team has a broad range of expertise in enforcement of patents, co-ordination of international patent litigation and dispute resolution, dealing with challenges to the validity of patents, patent entitlement issues, declaratory relief and preliminary injunctions and opinion work.
The judgment can be viewed here.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Press Release
Browne Jacobson wins UK Impact Case of the Year at the Managing IP EMEA Awards 2024
Legal Update
Forest Risk Commodities regulations: Steps food businesses should take
Legal Update
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
Legal Update
Artificial intelligence – shaping a sustainable future
Legal Update
ASA ruling on Calvin Klein FKA Twigs advertisement
Legal Update
A ‘One-Stop-Shop’ to the Unified Patent Court in Ireland
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked in World Trademark Review 2024
Legal Update
Veganism and manufacturing: IP protection
Legal Update
Veganism and manufacturing: Advertising pitfalls
Legal Update
The rise of AI in construction
Legal Update
An update on the independent review of university spin-out companies
On-Demand
Copyright issues with AI webinar
Published Article
The reasons for asset-based lending’s growing acceptance as a preferred funding source
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s patent litigation team praised for being “dynamic” and a “major player” in IAM Patent 1000 guide
Legal Update
Harnessing the potential of knowledge exchange, research and innovation
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise on international sale of entertainment company Music For Pets
Opinion
Practical points from High Court ruling that Tesco has infringed Lidl’s IP rights in its famous yellow circle logo
Legal Update
Knowledge exchange and intellectual property
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
On-Demand
Register your interest to join our next Home Delivery Academy
Press Release
Court of Appeal makes plea for legally enforceable arbitration for FRAND disputes
In the ongoing complex litigation between Optis Cellular Technology LLC and Apple Inc., the Court of Appeal ([2022] EWCA Civ 1411) has upheld the High Court’s findings that implementers of standard-essential patents (SEPs) cannot refuse to accept a FRAND license and continue activities in the meantime which constitute infringement: that party must commit to accept a court-determined license if it wishes to avoid an injunction.
Published Article
AI generated designs on retail products
Every AI will have its own terms of use. DALL·E 2’s Terms of Use dated 3 November 2022 specify that as between a user and Open AI, a user owns their prompts and uploads. Open AI also assigns to the user all rights in any images generated by DALL·E 2 for that user (subject to the user complying with those Terms of Use, and to a licence to use inputs and output to develop and improve the services).
Published Article
Bruce Willis AI and the problem with deepfakes
A deepfake of Bruce Willis is advertising Russian mobile phones. Many great artistic and metaphysical questions are raised by this performance. However, this article is going to look at the intellectual property law implications, from a UK perspective.
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s patent litigation lawyers praised in 2022’s IAM Patent 1000 guide
National law firm Browne Jacobson has been ranked again for both its patent litigation and transactional work in the 2022 edition of IAM Patent 1000, the independent guide to the world’s leading patent law firms and practitioners.
Legal Update
Creating a profitable future for your university intellectual property
Legal Update
Are spin-ins the new spin-outs?
Browne Jacobson has extensive experience in advising across all aspect of a HEI’s commercialisation strategy. If you would like to find out more, particularly in relation to spin-ins, please get in touch.
On-Demand
NFTs and Smart Contracts - an in-house lawyers perspective
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s IP experts shine silver in world’s leading trade mark lawyer rankings
Opinion
Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?
In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.
Published Article
Tipping the balance: Assessing patent infringement
In July this year, four years to the month after its introduction into UK law in the Supreme Court’s seminal judgment in Actavis v Eli Lilly, the court handed down its latest decision applying the ‘doctrine of equivalents’.
Published Article
Court of Appeal upholds decision that AI machines cannot be ‘inventors’
Published Article
Women in knowledge exchange and spinouts
Press Release
Browne Jacobson's IP team celebrates UK rankings success in latest Legal 500
Press Release
Reaction: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court judgment finds patent infringement based solely on equivalents
Reaction: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court judgment finds patent infringement based solely on equivalents
On-Demand
Diversity in spinouts, start-ups and early stage funding
Legal Update
Health care apps – Part 1 of 2: Exploring the ins and outs of intellectual property (IP)
On-Demand
In-House Lawyers: Brexit, intellectual property and commercial contracts
Covid-19 and the challenges associated with it grind on into a second wave. Not only that but there’s the prospect of Brexit and a looming recession ahead. It would be entirely forgivable not to be on top of the law right now. Watch our on-demand video, where we have discussed Brexit and intellectual property and consumer and commercial law changes.
Guide
Brexit overview: intellectual property and Brexit
We can how help you understand the potential issues that any changes will have on your business.
Legal Update
Could your new Covid-19 related intellectual property (IP) be commandeered by the Crown?
Universities across the nation have been working valiantly to produce a vaccine for SARS-CoV-2, otherwise known as Covid-19, in addition to working tirelessly on new testing options. It is easy in these times to forget that universities may still own valuable intellectual property (IP) created in these efforts.
Opinion
Sky’s overly broad trade marks narrowed as found partially invalid for bad faith
Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.