Vicarious liability
When considering vicarious liability, healthcare organisations need to consider not only the “relationship” and “close connection” test but also whether there is someone else who could or should be vicariously liable.
When considering vicarious liability, healthcare organisations need to consider not only the “relationship” and “close connection” test but also whether there is someone else who could or should be vicariously liable.
Vicarious liability arises because of the relationship between the Defendant and the wrongdoer. Historically, the relationship was one of employer/employee but in the past decade or so has been extended to include those relationships “akin to employment”, including youth organisations, religious organisations, the prison service and foster parents. Although the Courts have been willing to expand the range of relationships, they have also drawn a line between those which are “akin to employment” and those which are true “independent contractors”.
An organisation is not fixed with vicarious liability simply when the “relationship” test is met. In addition, a claimant will need to prove that the conduct of the wrongdoer is “closely connected” to their role for it to be right for a defendant to be held liable for their wrongful actions. In some cases there is no doubt that the close connection test will be met - for example, a school being responsible for the assault of a pupil by a teacher. Then there are other cases in which the close connection test will require detailed scrutiny. For example, should a supermarket be held responsible for their employee’s assault on a member of the public, or when a disgruntled employed auditor leaks data online?
By way of example, in the health context the issue might arise when some aspect of care is sub-contracted to a private organisation.
It is however settled law that more than one Defendant can be held vicariously liable for an individual’s tortious conduct. For example, a youth organisation and a religious organisation can be vicariously liable for a priest’s sexual abuse of a scout.
Healthcare providers need to ensure that this issue is considered when out-sourcing or sub-contracting work to avoid being fixed with liabilities further down the line. This is a developing area of the law and each situation needs to be considered carefully.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Automatic suspension and procurement law
Opinion
Plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce approved by government
Opinion
Increase to 20 hour limit on supplementary employment for Health and Care Worker visa holders
Legal Update
Supreme Court will hear Worcestershire case on local authority responsibility for Section 117 Aftercare in April 2023
Published Article
Thinking outside the box
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Implementing learning from claims to help improve patient safety
Legal Update
Cauda Equina Syndrome and application of the new GIRFT pathway
Opinion - Maternity services
University Hospital Leicester hold their inaugural Maternity Safety Conference
Opinion
Junior doctors vote unanimously in favour of strike action
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Published Article
Digital Twin Technologies: key legal contractual considerations
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners’ Question Time
On-Demand
Future of Care - Retirement Living webinar
Press Release - Careers
Browne Jacobson health lawyer wins major accolade at Made in Manchester Awards
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
Legal Update
Green Leases for the NHS
On-Demand
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) in the context of retirement living
Guide
Government response to the consultation on the Higher-Risk Buildings Regulations
Published Article
The first 100 days for Integrated Care Boards
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Press Release - Maternity services
Father Christmas comes to University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire care of Browne Jacobson’s Birmingham Office Community Action Group
Opinion - Maternity services
The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) and its impact on maternity services
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Opinion
Coroner’s refusal to issue a Prevention of Future Deaths Report following death in prison custody inquest was lawful
Article
Mental health, eating disorders and placement of young people
Legal Update
LPS consultation and ‘go live’ planning
Opinion
Consultation launched on plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce
Legal Update
Getting ready to face Industrial Action
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Prolonged disorders of consciousness
Online Event
Mock Inquest Training Sessions
Published Article
How AI and technology can transform the healthcare sector
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
On-Demand
Insights from the Chief Coroner by His Honour Judge Thomas Teague, KC
Opinion
BMA advises consultants not to accept less than the BMA minimum rate card for extra-contractual work
The BMA is advising all NHS / HSCNI consultants to ensure extra-contractual work is paid at the BMA minimum recommended rate and to decline offers of extra-contractual work that doesn't value them appropriately.