We consider key actions for public authorities in managing the PFI handover process.
This article is taken from May's public matters newsletter. Click here to view more articles from this issue.
A report from the National Audit Office (NAO), “Managing PFI assets and services as contracts end”, recommended that preparations for the handover of expiring private finance initiative (PFI) contracts should start seven years in advance of contract expiry. In this blog we consider key actions for public authorities in managing the PFI handover process.
For most PFI projects, the assets and services that have been provided by the private sector company, typically a ‘Special Purpose Vehicle’ (SPV) set up as a subsidiary of the companies investing in the PFI contract, are handed back to the relevant public authority upon expiry of the PFI contract. With no two PFI contracts being the same, each handover process will be unique. But there are some key steps all public authorities should be considering in planning for their PFI handover process.
The PFI contract should clearly set out:
so the very first step any public authority should take is to obtain an up to date copy of the PFI contract. This can take a considerable amount of time given the length and complexity of these contracts and the likelihood that it has been amended over time. Public authorities may need to request a copy of the contract from the SPV or lawyers involved in drafting the initial contract and update it with the many variations that have been agreed.
Although a PFI contract should include detailed handover provisions, early examples had little in the way of guidance to draw on and so are likely to contain ambiguities around the roles and responsibilities of the parties at contract expiry.
Public authorities will need to understand the handover process as set out in the PFI contract and create a project programme with key dates leading up to handover. They will also need to identify any gaps in the handover process and, if possible, agree any necessary work arounds with the SPV to ensure a smooth handover. Negotiating additions to a contract that is close to expiry is unlikely to be straightforward, and the earlier this is done the better and pragmatic legal advice will be essential.
Public authorities will need to create a project team to lead and manage the handover process, as significant assets are being handed over.This will require both additional resources, alongside those needed for daily operations, and a different set of skills. Key skills required include:
Public authorities will need to identify which of these skills are available in-house and where external resources will be needed. The long duration of PFI contracts is likely to mean that many of the individuals involved in setting up the contract will have left or be nearing or past retirement.
In 2007 HM Treasury issued guidance on the handover provisions PFI contracts should contain, including:
These provisions may be absent or unclear in early PFI contracts and although the Infrastructure Projects Authority (IPA) is working on guidance for PFI handover, this has not yet been published.
At the start of the handover process, and well before the end of the PFI contract, public authorities will need a clear understanding of: what physical assets and services are being handed back; what condition they are in; whether this meets the requirements in the PFI contract; what will happen to them after handover; and whether there are any compliance issues, for example the transfer of employee information, confidential data, and pensions arrangements.
The NAO has recommended that public authorities engage with SPVs as early as possible but also noted that SPVs have not always been fully cooperative.
In the lead up to expiry engagement with the SPV will be essential for:
Public authorities will need to arrange regular contact with the SPV and keep records of any communications, including documents shared or requested, meeting notes, and contact with third parties, e.g. lawyers, in relation to contract expiry discussions.
Before starting the handover process there may be ongoing PFI disputes concerning the delivery of services and the physical condition of assets to be handed over. Resolving these and any additional disputes that arise during the handover process before contract expiry is essential, as afterwards the SPV will be shut down and recovering payments will be difficult.
PFI contracts do allow public authorities to withhold a portion of their annual payments in the event of poor performance by the SPV but as the handover deadline gets closer this sanction becomes weaker.
They also provide for a dispute resolution procedure (DRP) but this can often take a minimum of 10 months to complete and does not guarantee a final outcome. The dispute may then go to arbitration or through the courts, implying additional cost and delay when time is not on your side.
Public authorities will need to take action as early as possible to identify ongoing and potential disputes and work closely with legal advisers to seek to resolve these promptly.
The NAO has advised public authorities with PFI contracts to start planning for handover seven years in advance of the contract expiry date, to ensure that the handover process runs smoothly and assets are handed over in good condition and service delivery is maintained. We suggest that there is much that needs to be done before even before that seven year period commences. It is likely that many public authorities, particularly those dealing with early PFI projects, will need longer to plan for and effectively manage the handover process.
If you need help with your handover plan or the implementation of the Project Agreement processes, we are ideally placed to help. If you would like to discuss this, please contact Martin Cannon.
Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Announced in September but scrapped on 17 November the investment zone proposals were very short lived. The proposal has now morphed into the proposal for a smaller number of clustered zones earmarked for investment.
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
In ‘failure to remove’ claims, the claimant alleges abuse in the family home and asserts that the local authority should have known about the abuse and/or that they should have removed the claimant from the family home and into care earlier.
Across the UK, homelessness is an urgent crisis, and one that is set to grow amid the rising cost of living. Local authorities are at the forefront of responding to this crisis, but with a lack of properties that are suitable for social housing across the UK, vulnerable individuals and families are often housed in temporary accommodation.
Settlement agreements in an employment context are ordinarily used to provide both parties with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship – but what happens when there is alleged discrimination after entering into a settlement agreement?
Updates include UK Shared Prosperity Fund, contracts, Subsidy Control Bill, data controller liability, Government Covid-19 procurement and Highway Code revisions.
The complex and rather nebulous transitional subsidy control regime set out in the UK-EU Trade and Co-operation Agreement and the UK’s wider international commitments has made it difficult for public authorities and those working with them to proceed with certainty where subsidies are involved.
