Royal assent now looms as the Procurement Bill is in the later stages of the Parliamentary process. In preparation for the reforms, this article zooms in on one of the new procurement procedures introduced by the Bill, namely, the competitive flexible procedure.
The competitive flexible procedure is one of two new competitive tendering procedures proposed under the Bill, which must be adopted before the award of a public contract. The first procedure, the ‘open procedure’, will be familiar to contracting authorities and is a single stage procedure where an interested party can submit a tender in response to an advertised public contract. Whereas the second, the ‘competitive flexible procedure’, is described as “any other” competitive tendering procedure which a contracting authority deems appropriate for the purpose of awarding the public contract.
The two new competitive tendering procedures introduced by the Bill represent a reduction from the eight identifiable procurement procedures which feature across different current regimes, including the Public Contract Regulations 2015, the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016 and the Concessions Contracts Regulations 2016. In turn, this echoes the aim of simplification under the Bill.
What are the main features of the competitive flexible procedure?
Flexibility
The clue is in the title - flexibility is the key feature of this new procedure. The Bill takes a permissive approach to describe the features of the competitive flexible procedure, noting that such a procedure may be a multi-stage process where supplier participants are limited in each of the stages, and where the award criteria may be refined at each successive stage.
The competitive flexible procedure, as the name suggests, invites flexibility to allow contracting authorities to design the procurement process according to considerations specific to the particular contract being procured. This should allow the public sector to really consider the market it is seeking bids from and its own requirements when shaping each procurement process.
In designing the procedure, the contracting authority must be mindful of the overriding requirement of proportionality - it should ensure that the process it designs is not unnecessarily complex or burdensome for suppliers to comply with, by reference to the nature, complexity and cost of the contract requirement. Flexible does not necessarily mean complex. Where it is expected that SMEs are likely to bid for the contract, then this obligation to avoid undue complexity is even stronger, because of parallel obligations to have regard to the fact that SMEs may face particular barriers to participation.
Apart from this obligation to not make the procurement unduly complex, there is little more said in the Bill about how it should be done. It does specifically note that the authority might follow successive stages, in similar way to that afforded currently in competitive dialogue or competitive procedure with negotiation.
One can easily draw parallels between the competitive flexible procedure and the light touch regime (LTR) under the current PCR. The LTR is only applicable to health, social, education and certain other services. Like the competitive flexible procedure, it gives authorities the flexibility in how they choose to run a procurement process, subject to compliance with the overriding principles of transparency, equal treatment and non-discrimination. Any experience that contracting authorities have in running LTR processes will be really helpful in understanding the competitive flexible procedure and may be a good starting point for its adoption. However, whereas the LTR provides the option to simply adopt one of the existing procedures (such as competitive dialogue), that “get-out” option is not applicable in the new regime, where such alternatives do not exist.
Principles / objectives
What will be obvious from examination of the procedure is that it is light on detailed rules. That is the whole point, which was to empower the contracting authority to take decisions for themselves about what works best for them for any given procurement need. However, there are still limits to the flexibility the Bill aims to introduce. Contracting authorities following this process will be subject to the provisions of the Bill, including the procurement principles and objectives. In the Explanatory Notes to the Bill, the government made this clear: “Implicitly this will operate within the bounds of the provisions of the Bill (such as procurement principles, publication and other requirement applicable to a competitive procedure) but can be designed around what would work best for the specific procurement”.
The permissive nature of the competitive flexible procedure and the absence of detailed rules on its use, mean that public authorities should pay special attention to ensure that any bespoke process is in-line with these procurement principles (a further briefing on the principles and objectives in the Procurement Bill will be released as part of this series). Procurement professionals will be very familiar with the concepts of equal treatment and making sure that an unfair advantage is not given to one supplier over another. In building a process under this procedure these overriding principles must still be observed.
Contracting authorities should also be mindful of the National Procurement Policy Statement (this is a statement that may be published by a minister setting out the government’s strategic priorities in relation to procurement) and the impact this may have in designing its procurement process.
Tender notices
Notwithstanding the apparent simplification, two options are given for the provision of tender notices and associated documents under the competitive flexible procedure:
- suppliers may be invited to submit a request to participate in the procedure; or
- simply invited to submit their first, or only, tender as part of the procedure.
This seems to imply that in following the second option, the contracting authority is purposely limiting its flexibility. This has some similarities to the current competitive procedure with negotiation where the authority can reserve the right to award after the submission of initial tenders without the need for any negotiation. Another way of looking at it is that if the authority was looking to carry out an open procedure, but wanted to reserve the right to negotiate after submission of tenders, this would be a mechanism to give that flexibility, without it having to embark down the route of a full competitive flexible procedure.
Refinement of award criteria
Under the competitive flexible procedure, where the authority intends to include successive stages, it is permissible to refine the award criteria at each stage, provided this right is reserved in the tender notice and associated documents. Perhaps somewhat obviously, the refinement cannot take place once tenders have been submitted. The refinement can be in relation to the selection criteria or the relative importance (weighting) of the criteria, but cannot have the effect of altering any earlier assessment against such criteria. It is also necessary to republish the tender notice and associated documents affected by refinements. We cannot conceive that this means that the procedure must start again, but merely that the record is corrected as such.
What can the public sector do to prepare for the use of the competitive flexible procedure?
1. Understand the new procedure
Understand the extent of the flexibility you have and how you might apply it in complex and more straightforward procurements.
It may be sensible not to focus on the term “competitive flexible procedure” as this might suggest a single set way of doing things. Instead focus on the wording in the Act: “such other competitive tendering procedure as the contracting authority considers appropriate for the purpose of awarding the public contract”.
2. Flexibility is a double-edged sword
Though the competitive flexible procedure allows for the design of a procurement process tailored around the specific public contract at hand, lack of clear rules warrants more emphasis on clarity in documenting the proposed process to avoid obscurity for the parties involved.
The very clear proportionality requirements will mean that the authority cannot slavishly follow a set way of doing competitive flexible, however much thought they have given in the first instance to this new-found freedom. This means ensuring that any template procurement documents which are developed are updated on a case by case basis to reflect the process designed for a specific procurement process. Internal guidance notes and standing orders should also be updated to reflect these new processes.
3. Review your procurement pipeline
Plan out in advance where your procurement process will benefit from the flexibility afforded by the competitive flexible procedure. This could be with regard to timescales, the number of participants to involve, setting evaluation criteria at different stages, and undertaking negotiations.
We will shortly be sharing a podcast on the practical considerations of the competitive flexible procedure, talking about how in practice we see this being used, the benefits for public authorities and potential pitfalls.
Discover more
You may be interested in...
Legal Update - Procurement Act
The Even Lighter Touch Regime
Online Event - Procurement Act
Procurement reform - change is coming, are you ready? Part 2
On-Demand
Provider Selection Regime – change is coming, what does it mean for you?
Published Article
Infrastructure and social value in public contracts – making it concrete
Online Event - Procurement Act
Procurement Reform - Change is coming, are you ready?
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill: Competitive flexible procedure, how will this work in practice?
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill - Are they still playing ping-pong?
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Act 2023: Getting Ready for Reform - the countdown is on!
Legal Update
PPN 08/23: using standard contracts
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advising the Welsh Government on the delivery of significant number of renewable energy projects
Legal Update
Guidance on contract changes: James Waste Management LLP v Essex County Council
Legal Update
Case summary: the importance of bringing a procurement claim within the appropriate time limits
Legal Update - Procurement Act
New obligations for Welsh public bodies on social partnership and socially responsible procurement
Article
Challenging procurement decisions by way of Judicial Review - the key principles
Legal Update
Australia and New Zealand Free Trade Agreement drives changes to the Public Procurement rules
Published Article
Amendments to Procurement Bill: Navigating sanctions and supplier bans and impact on the construction sector
On-Demand
'Getting ready to reform – preparing for the new Procurement Bill' webinar
Legal Update
Changes to the Standard Selection Questionnaire effective from 1 April 2023
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Automatic suspension and procurement law
Press Release
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - February 2023
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill debarment regime and ECHR issues
Published Article
Digital Twin Technologies: key legal contractual considerations
Guide - Procurement Act
Public procurement: key facts and compliance considerations
Published Article
Reaching cloud nine? Public procurement for cloud-based services
Opinion - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill - what’s new in 2022?
Legal Update
CCGs’ conduct “sufficiently serious” for award of damages in High Court procurement case
This case provides a reminder to contracting authorities that whilst the bar for an award of damages in procurement cases is high, following the Supreme Court ruling in Energy Solutions EU Ltd v Nuclear Decommissioning Authority [2017] 1 WLR 1373, it is not insurmountable when a contracting authority has acted with disregard to the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCRs). There is also further guidance as to the use of frameworks
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Pre procurement planning the importance of early market engagement
On-Demand - Procurement Act
Get ready for reform: The new Procurement Bill
Legal Update - Procurement Act
The Procurement Bill - selection, exclusion, conflict of interests and debarment
Legal Update
The Introduction of the Social Partnership and Public Procurement (Wales) Bill by the Welsh Government
Published Article
Sustainability in construction
The climate emergency has reached a point where real and substantial damage is being caused to both the planet and society. There has been a shift from planning and theorising the most effective solutions, to a phase where practical, efficient, and sustainable solutions are required at speed.
Opinion
Responding to Grenfell – Slow progress is better than none
As the Grenfell Inquiry continues, how have the Phase 1 recommendations changed the fire safety and building safety landscape?
Legal Update
Modern Slavery and the NHS – new challenges on the horizon for NHS bodies and their suppliers
According to a report published by the Financial Reporting Council in April, modern slavery generates an estimated US$150 billion annually and encompasses 40 million people in slavery globally.
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Public procurement: Plus ça change, plus c’est la même choses
Legal Update
Contracts with Russian and Belarusian suppliers
We are all aware of the unfolding situation in Ukraine following the invasion of Russian forces, and the support afforded to Russia by Belarus. The UK Government has, in response to the conflict, issued sanctions on companies and individuals.
On-Demand - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill - key changes and how will it affect you?
On-Demand
Commissioning Health Tech in an ICS World
We invite you to watch our on-demand webinar which looks into how healthtech is commissioned from a health and tech perspective.
Legal Update
Progress of procurement reforms
As we look ahead to planned and potential legal developments in 2022, one area we have been keeping a close eye on is the progress of the Government’s planned reforms to procurement law.