Copyright issues with AI webinar
AI productivity revolution or inferno of infringement? A review of the intellectual property landscape in the UK.
- Do intellectual property rights subsist in AI generated works?
- Do AI generated works infringe third party IP?
- Will training AI on third party materials infringe IP?
Key contact
Giles Parsons
Partner
giles.parsons@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)20 7337 1505
You may be interested in...
UK and Irish trade mark and advertising law: Some surprising developments since INTA 2025
IP insights: March 2026
ASA monthly insights March 2026: Rulings you need to know about
Sole searching: How Deity Shoes found protection without breaking new ground
ASA monthly insights February 2026: Rulings you need to know about
Browne Jacobson IP team ranked among the world’s leading trademark advisers
Supreme Court decision on Oatly using 'milk': Legal comment
No source for concern: IPEC draws a line on software copyright in Edozo v Valos
IP insights: January 2026
Kohler Mira v Norcros: Key lessons in purposive construction for patent drafters
Protecting your brand from 'genericide': Lessons from Dryrobe v D-Robe
Court of Appeal says ‘no’ to co-branding but dismisses copyright claim in AGA conversion case
Looting the loot: Virtual in-game gold pieces are property capable of being stolen in criminal law
ASA monthly insights December 2025: Rulings you need to know about
ASA monthly insights November 2025: Rulings you need to know about
IP insights: November 2025
Getty Images’ copyright not infringed by Stability AI making its Stable Diffusion model available to users in the UK
ASA monthly insights October 2025: Four(ish) rulings you need to know about
IP insights: September 2025
ASA monthly insights August 2025: Four (or so) rulings you need to know about
IP insights: July 2025
ASA monthly insights July 2025: Four(teen) rulings you need to know about
Trade mark strategy in a global market
Key copyright and AI ruling with broad implications for UK lawyers and beyond
UK court clarifies copyright protection for "works of artistic craftsmanship"
Intellectual property (IP) predictions for 2025
CJEU confirms that copyright law is the same for all claimants
Copyright issues with AI webinar
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
Bruce Willis AI and the problem with deepfakes
A deepfake of Bruce Willis is advertising Russian mobile phones. Many great artistic and metaphysical questions are raised by this performance. However, this article is going to look at the intellectual property law implications, from a UK perspective.
DSA approved: Targeted Advertising Rules explained
Digital Markets Act and Data Platforms - FRANDs for life?
The Digital Markets Act (the “DMA”) joins the dots between competition law and data protection law and actively targets data-driven platforms. It is also a comprehensive regulation to take note of, with familiar GDPR-style fines tied to turnover.
When embedding audio-visual content in web pages is copyright infringement
If you publish website content then you need to be careful before embedding third party images. The rights of a copyright owner are infringed if their work is communicated to the public without their permission.
Browne Jacobson’s half year deals activity exceeds £500m
Browne Jacobson’s Manchester office has seen the value of deals which its corporate, banking and real estate teams have advised on exceed an aggregate of £500m in the first half of its financial year, a major milestone for the firm which has grown its transactions offering considerably over the same period.
How to commercialise your IP: licensing, spin outs and JVs
Our expert panel, comprised of IP and corporate law specialists, will be discussing IP commercialisation strategies, their benefits and pitfalls, drawing on experience across the private, public and higher education sectors.
Browne Jacobson scores victory for Wolverhampton Wanderers over badge copyright claim
Browne Jacobson is delighted to have assisted Wolverhampton Wanders Football Club to successfully defend a copyright infringement claim made against it which relates to the club’s iconic wolf head design. The club has used this design as an element of its badge since 1979.
Browne Jacobson's trade mark team recognised in latest WTR 1000 rankings
Are you compliant with AIM Rule 26?
From 28 September 2018, all AIM companies are required to adopt a recognised corporate governance code such as the UK Corporate Governance Code or the QCA Corporate Governance Code and comply with that corporate governance code on a 'comply or explain' basis.
Action for breach of the AIM Rules
As well as adapting to changes to governance requirements, recent disciplinary action by the London Stock Exchange highlights the importance of regular discussion with Nominated Advisers to mitigate the risk of inadvertent breach of the AIM Rules.