With headlines hitting the press of industrial action and ballot results within the education sector, the government has issued the first draft of the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill (‘Strikes Bill’) which is its second attempt at imposing minimum service levels, following last year’s draft Transport Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill.
The scope of the Strikes Bill as it is currently drafted is very wide. It would apply across England, Scotland and Wales and power is reserved to the Secretary of State to specify the relevant minimum service levels, after consultation with such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
Minimum service levels can be issued for any education services, as well as services falling within: health services; fire and rescue services; transport services; decommissioning of nuclear instalments and management of radioactive waste and spent fuel; and border security. None of these services are defined further, and whilst the government press release makes reference to “access to public services”, the Strikes Bill is not in fact drafted as being limited only to public sector organisations or service providers.
On the face of it, therefore, all schools could be in scope, regardless of their governance structure or funding arrangements (as well as pre-schools and further and higher education providers). The Strikes Bill is also drafted specifically to cover strikes taking place after the regulations come into force, even if the strike notice or relevant ballot pre-dated those regulations.
The government’s press release makes a number of references to the need to ensure the safety of the public; however, there is no limitation within the Strikes Bill to requiring minimum service levels linked to safety (as opposed to operational convenience or to minimise disruption within society), nor in fact any guidance or thresholds as to what “minimum” means.
On the current wording, minimum service levels could be set for schools for any reason – whether to avoid disruption to education or to minimise the impact of industrial action on working parents. Further, whilst minimum service levels could be set at a level to enable continued provision for the most vulnerable children (or, for example, to oblige a similar “key-worker” provision as was in place during the pandemic) in theory, the minimum required could be at or near full-service provision, such as for particular year groups during exam periods.
There would in fact be nothing to prevent the minimum service level being set to require full education provision for all year groups at all times during the academic year. The current draft therefore has the potential to entirely undermine the right to strike.
The press release indicates that the government hopes that it will not need to issue any minimum service levels for employers outside of fire, ambulance and rail and that it expects those employers to work together to reach voluntary agreements to enable them to deliver a reasonable level of service. The power of the government to step in has been reserved “should that become necessary”.
It is not in any way clear how such voluntary arrangements are meant to operate within the education sector and in particular what degree of cooperation is expected of employers to both agree and then meet general minimum service levels. This sort of voluntary arrangement puts the onus onto employers and, whilst the degree of control may be welcomed by some, others may view this as an attempt to shift the focus of the unions onto local employers and away from national pay disputes.
Furthermore, voluntary arrangements are not referenced in the Strikes Bill at all – the “works notice” provisions (see below) apply where the Secretary of State has issued minimum service level regulations and would not apply where there are only voluntary arrangements in place.
Where minimum service levels regulations have been made and a trade union gives notice of industrial action, then the “works notice” provisions apply, although there is a mix of “may” and “must” wording included in the draft.
Relevant employers will need to consult with unions about the numbers of staff required to meet those minimum service levels (although the drafting is silent on the consequences of employers not maintaining the minimum service levels). A “works notice” must identify those employees who are required to work to secure the minimum service levels, together with the work that they are required to do.
The notice must not specify more persons than are reasonably necessary to provide the services, and no regard must be taken of union membership when identifying who is required to work. An employee who is identified in the works notice but who nevertheless takes part in the industrial action will not fall within the deemed unfair dismissal provisions under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
Unions may also be liable to pay damages if they fail to take reasonable steps to ensure all those who are named in the works notice comply with that notice. No further information as to what “reasonable steps” would be is given.
As would be expected, there has been considerable union opposition to these proposals. Although the government has indicated that it doesn’t want to legislate unless it has to, it is at the same time seeking to reserve considerable power to impose service levels on a huge number of employers, employees and unions across widely drawn sectors, without any fetters on the service levels set, nor the circumstances in which service levels can be imposed.
It is perhaps unsurprising that the government’s attempts to restrict industrial action are being described as “draconian” and it remains to be seen firstly whether the proposed legislation will survive in its current form and, if so, how the reserved powers will actually be exercised by the government.
The impact on schools and other educational providers, particularly in respect of employee morale and union relations (already strained as a result of the impact of the cost of living and national pay disputes), is not, at this stage, clear – but it is certainly a potential area of reform to keep an eye on.
Regardless of the outcome of ballots on industrial action, unless there is drastic change to funding for schools in relation to pay increases, it will be unusual to find any organisational budget that is not impacted by the current economic situation.
There’s been little evidence of interventions or financial management reviews this year and it appears the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) has re-focussed on financial delivery. It’s also telling that there were no discernible changes to the reporting of financial irregularities in the Academies Trust Handbook 2022.
The Children’s Commissioner, Rachel De Souza, has recently published a report “Beyond the labels: a SEND system which works for every child, every time”, which she intends to sit alongside the DfE’s SEND Review (2019) and SEND Green Paper (2022) and which she hopes will put children’s voices at the heart of the government’s review of SEND system.
Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021.
As well as providing day-to-day support to help you focus on managing your settings, we also provide training and professional development on a range of topics to keep you and your staff up-to-date.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHCR) recently issued new, non-statutory guidance regarding the wearing of natural or protective hairstyles, specifically in reference to their representation in uniform, behaviour or standalone appearance policies.
Emma Hughes, head of HR services at Browne Jacobson, explains how CST’s updated executive pay report and the linked benchmarking service from XpertHR can help trust boards make robust decisions on pay.
There’s greater opportunity than ever for parents, carers and guardians to voice any concerns they have relating to their child’s education and for their concerns to be heard and to be taken seriously. While most staff in schools and academies are conscious of their legal duties relating to complaints management, many are struggling to cope with such a significant increase in the volume of complaints they must manage.
This guidance has been prepared to support academy trusts (Trusts) who want to hold a fully virtual Annual General Meeting (AGM) or a hybrid AGM, as we know that Trusts may want to be prepared for future disruption as well as having a general interest in holding more meetings virtually. The guidance also applies to other meetings of the Members (known as General Meetings).
We’re pleased to collaborate with Lloyds Bank, who recently asked us and audit and risk specialists Crowe UK to offer guidance that academy trusts would find helpful when considering setting up a trading subsidiary.
The World Cup kicks off in Qatar on Sunday 20 November 2022, with the final taking place on Sunday 18 December 2022. Undoubtedly, this is a huge sporting event, and many employees will be keen to show their support for their favourite teams. However, due to the time difference, start times for the matches are between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. UK time, which could have an impact on employers if employees who wish to watch the matches are scheduled to work.
The DfE has published new guidance and opened the application process for window two of the Trust Capacity Fund (TCaF) for 2022/2023, with a fund of £86m in trust capacity funding focused particularly on education investment areas.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse was established in March 2015. We now have its report. As you would expect with such a broad scope, the report is long and makes a number of far-reaching recommendations. In this article, Dai Durbridge highlights seven of the 20 recommendations, sets out how they could impact on schools and suggests what steps to take now.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has been named as winner of the ‘Legal Advisors to Education Institutions’ category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.
Since the new Suspensions and Exclusions Statutory Guidance was published, we have received a lot of questions about the use of managed moves. For the first time, the Statutory Guidance does explain what a managed move is, but in relatively broad terms and does not cover the mechanics of how a managed move should operate.
Over 3000 young people from across the UK and Ireland took part in a virtual legal careers insight event, aimed at making the legal profession more diverse.
Holly Quirk, an associate barrister in Browne Jacobson’s Manchester office, was awarded the Legal Professional of the Year Award at this year’s Manchester Young Talent Awards.
The risk of assault against staff is, sadly, something that all schools need to consider carefully. Here one legal expert explains what they can do to protect staff and ensure they fulfil their duty of care.
