‘Gay cake’ discrimination case ruled inadmissible by ECHR
This case has been rumbling on for over seven years. It relates to a bakery’s refusal to make a cake with the slogan ‘support gay marriage’.
This now infamous case has been rumbling on for over seven years. It relates to a bakery’s refusal to make a cake with the slogan ‘support gay marriage’ on it for Mr Gareth Lee.
Whilst Mr Lee had previously successfully argued that the bakery’s refusal to undertake his request was direct discrimination on the grounds of his sexual orientation at both the County Court and Court of Appeal within Northern Ireland, the Supreme Court then overturned these decisions and held that the Mr Lee’s discrimination claim should be dismissed.
The Supreme Court ruling was related to articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which refer to freedom of religious beliefs and freedom of expression. Ultimately, the Supreme Court’s assessment was that the Christian bakers were not obligated to provide anyone with a product bearing a message that they profoundly disagreed with. Therefore, whilst it would have been discriminatory to refuse to supply Mr Lee with a cake because of his beliefs or sexual orientation, the bakers retained the right to not express a particular opinion that they disagreed with, and so the claim was dismissed.
Mr Lee subsequently took his case to the European Court of Human Rights which also dismissed his case. The Court said that the case was inadmissible due to Mr Lee not invoking his rights under the ECHR at any point during his domestic proceedings in the UK courts. It decided that convention arguments must be raised explicitly before domestic authorities, prior to being bought to the European Courts. This has now seemingly brought to an end a claim that has raised serious questions around religious freedom and discrimination law.
Some will see this as a missed opportunity to consider the discrimination issues at the heart of this case, but nevertheless, this once more demonstrates the subtleties and difficulties behind bringing and defending discrimination claims.
Employers and business alike, need to remain alive to the possibility of discrimination within the workplace, ensuring that they are acting as promptly and thoroughly as possible, all while being assisted by robust policies and procedures.
Contact
Mark Hickson
Head of Business Development
onlineteaminbox@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)370 270 6000
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Significant amendments to the Employment Rights Bill unveiled
Legal Update
Consultation on the new School Support Staff Negotiating Body
In Person Event
Mock Employment Tribunal
Legal Update - Employment Rights Bill
The Employment Rights Bill: Is it here yet?
Opinion
Pride Month: A time to review DEI
Opinion
Employer redundancy guide: Sourcing alternative employment
Legal Update
DEI in school governance: Key themes and insights
Guide
Using AI for recruitment: The data issues
Guide
The socio-economic duty: Shifting mindsets for true social mobility
Legal Update
Trans matters in health for trusts and acute settings: The decision in For Women Scotland
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s School Leaders Survey illustrates concerns over financial resilience ahead of spending review
Press Release
Majority of UK organisations remain committed to sustainability and ESG, says new research
Opinion
Disciplinary procedures and mental health: Employer considerations
Opinion
Supreme Court gender ruling: Ensuring inclusion in the workplace
Guide
Overview of the European Accessibility Act 2025 in Ireland
Legal Update
Celebrating diversity and inclusion in the NHS: Equality, Diversity, and Human Rights Week 2025
Legal Update
Supporting mental wellbeing in the workplace: Practical steps for businesses
Legal Update
Outsourcing contracts in the age of AI
Legal Update
A New chapter for families: Reflecting on the first month of the introduction of neonatal care leave
Legal Update
Trans matters in care: The decision in For Women Scotland
Legal Update
Trans matters in sport: The decision in For Women Scotland
Opinion
EHRC releases guidance for employers after Supreme Court ruling on definition of woman
Legal Update
2025/26 employment rates and limits: Are costs increases having a negative impact on the job market?
On-Demand
NEC contracts: Key facts
Legal Update
The concept of sex is binary: For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers Supreme Court case explained
Legal Update
Updated Modern Slavery Act Transparency Guidance: Key obligations and steps for businesses
Legal Update
Do whistleblowing protections extend to external job applicants?
Legal Update
How will US tariffs affect energy and infrastructure sectors in UK and Ireland?
Legal Update
US tariffs: Implications for the UK automotive sector and practical steps for businesses
Legal Update
US tariffs: Market chaos and implications for the UK tech sector
Legal Update
What new US tariffs mean for retail and supply chain
Legal Update - Employment Rights Bill
The Employment Rights Bill: What the new amendments mean for employers
On-Demand - Care Focus webinar series
Care Focus: Regulatory and employment
Legal Update
Fair conduct dismissal: Guidance from the Court of Appeal
Legal Update
Employment healthcare briefing: March 2025
Legal Update
Cleared for takeoff: Wales' aerospace and space ecosystem could help boost UK defence
Legal Update
From satellites to security: Dual-use technology takes flight
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Obsequio Group on strategic expansion
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Mercia Ventures on £3.9m investment in highways drainage specialist Crown Plus
