In May 2016 an inquest into the charity’s care was opened following the death of Sophie Bennett.
In May 2016 an inquest into the charity’s care was opened following the death of Sophie Bennett. In February 2019 that inquest concluded leadership and oversight of the charity’s board was 'grossly inadequate'. The Coroner identified serious failings by the trustees to keep their beneficiaries safe from harm. Following this report the Charity Commission opened a statutory inquiry on 5 March 2019.
The inquest found neglect contributed to the death of Sophie Bennett. She had been cared for at Lancaster Lodge, a therapeutic community run by Richmond Psychosocial Foundation International ('RPFI’), since April 2015.
The home had previously received a rating of good from the Care and Quality Commission (CQC) and was well run.
In January 2016, a number of changes were made to the home. A decision was made to cancel external therapies. The decision to cut therapies and all external clinical supervision compelled the then registered manager to resign.
After protests from residents and staff, therapies were continued, but the standard of care at the home fell to the extent that the CQC assessed the service in March 2016 as ‘inadequate’. In evidence, the CQC inspector described the home at that stage as ‘chaotic’.
An adviser to the home, although understood by other staff to have a medical degree, in fact had a doctorate in public management and administration from Knightsbridge University – an unaccredited institution in Denmark. In the inquest RPFI were unable to produce any record of the adviser’s credentials.
The home manager accepted in evidence that she would not have the qualifications and experience to be a registered manager of the home.
Some newly recruited support workers had no relevant qualifications or experience.
On 28 April 2016, Sophie told staff she was experiencing suicidal thoughts and urges. Staff contacted Crisis Line – they advised an urgent admission to hospital for assessment. Staff did not take her to hospital but chose to monitor her; this was a 'management' decision.
She was placed on close observations. However, on 2 May 2016 she was allowed behind a closed bathroom door where she was not subject to close observations. She was found hanging in the bathroom.
At the conclusion of a three week inquest with HM Coroner for West London, the jury concluded that Sophie’s death was contributed to by neglect on the part of RPFI. In particular, the jury held that:
The Charity Commission opened a statutory inquiry on 5 March 2019. Their focus is on governance and compliance under charity law. The focus of the inquiry is:
Michelle Russell, Director of Investigations, Monitoring and Enforcement at the Charity Commission emphasised that the Coroner found that the governance failings of the charity directly contributed to Sophie’s death and the opening of this inquiry reflected the seriousness of the Coroner’s report.
The Charity Commission said it had been engaging with RPFI on a number of matters since 2016 and is continuing to work with the CQC and the adult social services teams at Richmond and Wandsworth.
Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Announced in September but scrapped on 17 November the investment zone proposals were very short lived. The proposal has now morphed into the proposal for a smaller number of clustered zones earmarked for investment.
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
In ‘failure to remove’ claims, the claimant alleges abuse in the family home and asserts that the local authority should have known about the abuse and/or that they should have removed the claimant from the family home and into care earlier.
Across the UK, homelessness is an urgent crisis, and one that is set to grow amid the rising cost of living. Local authorities are at the forefront of responding to this crisis, but with a lack of properties that are suitable for social housing across the UK, vulnerable individuals and families are often housed in temporary accommodation.