Changes to the standard of proof for findings of unlawful killing in inquests
The Supreme Court has considered whether the applicable standard of proof in inquest proceedings should be to the criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt) or the civil standard (on the balance of probabilities).
The Supreme Court in the case of R (on the application of Maughan) v Her Majesty's Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire has considered whether the applicable standard of proof in inquest proceedings should be to the criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt) or the civil standard (on the balance of probabilities). The focus in this case was the determination of suicide, but the judgment also applies to the determination of an unlawful killing.
The Supreme Court determined by a majority of 3-2 that the standard of proof for all short form conclusions of suicide and unlawful killing should be the civil standard. Lady Arden supported by two other Lords held that the previous case law was not binding on the Supreme Court and did not identify a good enough reason against applying the civil standard. She was of the view that this decision would effectively lead to consistency between determinations made at an inquest.
This sees a departure from previous case law and the Coroner’s Inquests Rules 2013, which explained that the standard of proof in short form conclusions of suicide and unlawful killing was the criminal standard and that for all other conclusions the civil standard applied. Of course, this meant that a narrative conclusion could be reached on the balance of probabilities which could in effect be construed as suicide or unlawful killing, albeit phrased differently.
This judgment however means that a coroner or jury need not be sure on the evidence that a person took their own life having intended to do so or that a person has been killed without lawful excuse and in breach of the law before reaching a conclusion of suicide or unlawful killing and without having to resort to penning a narrative conclusion.
The conclusion of unlawful killing does not extend to the criminal offences of causing death by dangerous driving or causing death by careless driving and it does not extend to Health and Safety Act offences where death results. No reference should be made in an inquest to any of these offences or the elements of the offences.
However, an unlawful killing conclusion could be found if the coroner or a jury are satisfied that it is more likely than not that death was as a result of corporate manslaughter. Namely, that the way in which the organisation’s activities are managed or organised causes a person’s death and amounts to a gross breach of a relevant duty of care owed to the deceased.
This therefore could potentially have a bigger impact on the regulatory and criminal landscape as more police investigations could be re-opened or triggered by unlawful killing conclusions in the Coroner’s Courts. Depending upon the evidence found as a result of police enquiries, this could then see a new or re-opened HSE enquiry.
The impact of this decision highlights that clients who become interested parties and who are faced with this conclusion in an inquest will need to properly consider, at the outset of instructing their solicitors, issues relating to disclosure, witnesses, the application of Article 2, the scope of the inquiry, the terms of reference and whether a jury is required. This will require a substantial amount of work to be undertaken before the case goes to the coroner which supports their stance on those issues.
Clients will also need to consider whether they want to intensify their legal arguments on whether a jury can safely reach those conclusions and be prepared to be involved and assist in what can be a lengthy and difficult process.
You may be interested in...
Regulator warning on future dangers of asbestos
The Home Affairs Committee launched another inquiry into fraud - Stop! Think Fraud
Progress on the Automated Vehicles Bill
Climate change - what action should we take?
UK falls to lowest position for corruption – so what’s going wrong?
Legal Update - Food and drink regulatory update
Food for Thought: Food and drink regulatory update - Autumn 2023
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 – what does it mean for my company?
King’s Speech gives the green light for autonomous vehicles
What’s lurking in your garden? The UK’s most dangerous and invasive plants
Landowner fined £15,000 after public attacked by cows
The future of autonomous technology - August 2023
Polluters to face unlimited penalties under new legislation
Browne Jacobson grows Cardiff team with two new appointments
Higher-risk buildings – are you ready for 30 September 2023?
Government to expand network and information systems regulations
New provisions for higher-risk residential buildings now in force
UK Government publishes the Online Safety Bill: an overview
Update on the Digital Services Act (“DSA”) – Important Dates and Deadlines Looming
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - January 2023
Browne Jacobson advises Natural England on investigation of ‘first in its kind’ sentenced Devon farmer
Biodiversity Net Gain: positive for nature and an opportunity for landowners
Logistics firm fined for multiple failings leading to asbestos exposure
Logistics company Eddie Stobart has been fined £133,000, after a series of failures which took place whilst excavation work was carried out, exposing its staff to asbestos.
Consumer duty part 2 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
Directors fined for unsafe removal of asbestos
Two directors of a construction company were fined after failing to ensure the safe removal of asbestos from a plot of land. On 14 and 15 November 2021, Directors Anthony Sumner and Neil Brown, of Waterbarn Limited were involved in the uncontrolled removal of asbestos material from a plot of land in Grasscroft, Oldham.
Don't look down
An engineering company in Tyne and Wear was fined £20,000 after a worker fractured his pelvis and suffered internal injuries after falling through a petrol station forecourt canopy, whilst he was replacing the guttering.
DSA approved: Targeted Advertising Rules explained
HSE inspection of asbestos in schools
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) have announced they will be carrying out a programme of inspections to primary and secondary school establishments from September 2022. The inspections will assess how schools are managing the risks from asbestos and meeting the Duty to Manage requirements, set out in Regulation 4 of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012.
“Red tape” reform and no-fault dismissals
The Government has announced a change to the categorisation of “small” businesses to reduce the amount of regulatory compliance (or “red tape”) required. Currently, SMEs (those with fewer than 250 employees) are exempt from certain regulations – such as the obligation to comply with gender pay reporting. With effect from 3 October, these exemptions will be widened to apply to businesses with fewer than 500 employees.
U-turn on DEI regulatory reporting
Avoiding the pitfalls of WhatsApp
The use of social media platforms and applications can have overwhelmingly positive benefits for public bodies. However, regulatory action recently taken by the Information Commissioner, has highlighted various pitfalls that public bodies should seek to avoid if allowing staff to use social media as a communication tool.
Is it hot in here, or is it just me?
Whilst the weather conditions are predicted to be cooling down this week, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is asking employers and businesses to consider adapting to recurrent warmer weather conditions for the safety and benefit of their staff. It asks employers to ensure that extreme heat becomes a firm part of longer term risk management. Climate change in any event is something all businesses will need to consider as the warmer weather becomes more frequent - extreme heat is something that will impact employers on a day to day basis.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: The Fitness to Practise Regime
In this session, our speakers discussed the Fitness to Practise Regime and how we can help.
Published Article - Building Safety Act
The Building Safety Act 2022: Navigating building liability orders
Compliance - small businesses and new regulation
The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) has released a report setting out the impact of new and changing regulations arising from the pandemic on small businesses across the UK.
Construction: Gold Standard Framework – seven months on
We have created a summary of the recommendations and consistent themes which we are now starting to see becoming more embedded in public sector procurement practices.
On-Demand - Building Safety Act
Building Safety Bill – what’s coming and how will it affect you?
Opinion - Building Safety Act
Building Safety Bill receives Royal Assent
Don’t let the lights go out – dealing with an insolvent energy supplier
There are a number of factors which have contributed to the crisis including the huge increase in wholesale natural gas prices, which have risen some 250% since the start of 2021. Since the start of last year, over 30 energy firms have gone bust in the UK alone.
Fraud – why it pays to be vigilant
Financial crime is an increasing threat to all organisations. The modes of facilitating fraud have become easier. Being a victim of fraud as an organisation risks significant financial consequences, but also serious reputational harm and loss of stakeholder confidence.