Religion in the workplace
Despite the behaviour of some recently in Parliament, the UK is, one hopes, a tolerant and respectful society with some of the most comprehensive anti-discrimination laws in the world. That said, the place of religion in the workplace is still regularly tested.
Despite the behaviour of some recently in Parliament, the UK is, one hopes, a tolerant and respectful society with some of the most comprehensive anti-discrimination laws in the world. That said, the place of religion in the workplace is still regularly tested in Tribunals and courts across the UK, with many people contending that they experience discrimination because of their (or others) religious or other beliefs.
It is against the law for an employer to discriminate against anyone because of their religion or belief. This can range from well-established faiths to a belief in the BBC! However, whilst it is accepted that people with such beliefs should not face discrimination in the workplace, beliefs do not always trump the demands of the employer.
To complicate matters, many employers face allegations of indirect discrimination which can arise from various, seemingly harmless, requirements such as a dress code stating that employees are not able to display facial hair or wear anything which covers their face.
Indirect discrimination is a form of discrimination that can be justified. Not surprisingly, this is where many of the arguments arise. An employee may say that they are religious, for example, but an employer may say that wearing a long-flowing religious garment in an environment where that may cause a serious trip hazard is prohibited.
Likewise, it would not be unreasonable to argue that a teacher should refrain from covering their face in the classroom on the basis that seeing a teacher’s mouth and facial expressions aids a child’s education. As ever, justification comes down to managing the competing interests of the employer and the employee and any other relevant individuals.
Our laws place an obligation on employers to be conscious of the effect that their decisions may have on people of differing religions or beliefs. Further, if an employee says that they have been adversely affected by a decision or policy due to their religion or belief, you should think carefully about whether turning the request down would be disproportionate. I have seen many employers attempt to put in place blanket bans – this is dangerous, and inflexibility is not welcomed by the Employment Tribunals.
Managing religion/belief in the workplace
There are several easy steps that you can take to lessen the risk of discriminating against your staff.
-
Make sure work events are inclusive
Not surprisingly, it is good practice to ensure that a range of foods and non-alcoholic drinks are offered at work events, and that any foods offered are clearly labelled to allow staff to be able to easily identify what they can/can’t consume. Consult with your staff. With the festive season coming up, start your planning now. -
Be aware of harassment towards or from employees and take a zero tolerance approach to this
Educating employees about discrimination and what may constitute harassment, and encouraging them to respect each other’s different beliefs, will likely help to prevent inappropriate behaviour. Equally, if you face a claim, Tribunals are always interested in what level of training you have given your managers and staff to raise awareness of these issues.
In the event that such behaviour does occur, you should respond to evidence/complaints in a timely manner and ensure that such behaviour is not tolerated.
You should be mindful that they will be found to be responsible for religious discrimination carried out by their employees unless they can show that they did everything they reasonably could to prevent it. -
Be respectful of an employee’s practices
Some religious groups may be required to pray during work hours. Where possible, you should assist this by designating a suitable space to be used such as a meeting room – it is not a difficult or onerous requirement and failing to accommodate this could cause problems.
Similarly, whilst time off for a religious holiday is normally taken out of annual leave, it may be possible for employees to allow ‘swaps’ of holiday, where for example an employee works on a public holiday related to the Christian calendar in exchange for receiving a holiday in their religious calendar as leave.
As ever, knowing what your employees require, listening, and acting will go a long way to maintaining an engaged – and non-litigious – workforce.
This article was originally published by People Management in October 2019.
Contact

James Tait
Partner
james.tait@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)121 237 3999
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Employment claims: the new rates and limits from 6 April 2023
Opinion
Plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce approved by government
Opinion
Increase to 20 hour limit on supplementary employment for Health and Care Worker visa holders
Article
New report highlights risk of sidelining ED&I in school trusts
Opinion
Mopping up after a leak – how businesses can take steps to protect their confidential information
Online Event
Wellbeing and financial considerations – practical solutions for challenging times
Press Release
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
Legal Update
Public matters - February 2023
Legal Update
Teacher strikes – lessons learnt so far
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Legal Update
Procurement Bill debarment regime and ECHR issues
Published Article
Digital Twin Technologies: key legal contractual considerations
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Guide
Public procurement: key facts and compliance considerations
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
On-Demand
Employment update webinar
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Opinion
Fire and re-hire – draft statutory code
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Natural England on investigation of ‘first in its kind’ sentenced Devon farmer
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
On-Demand
The Subsidy Control Act 2022. Putting the new regime into practice
Opinion
Consultation on holiday entitlement – part-year and irregular workers
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Opinion
Twitter facing employment claims following mass redundancies
News that Twitter is being threatened with multiple claims by UK employees following mass redundancies provides a reminder of the risks that comes with an employer implementing large scale redundancy exercises.Legal Update
Industrial Action and Minimum Service Levels
Legal Update
Discrimination comes of age
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Legal Update
Updated Greening Government Commitments 2021 – 2025 published
Opinion
Is over centralisation hindering economic growth?
Opinion
Rising Employment Tribunal backlog
Legal Update
Official statistics demonstrate a new wave of age discrimination claims
Opinion
Menopause and the NHS workforce addressing the female brain drain…
Opinion
4-day working week a success?
The Covid-19 pandemic drastically changed the world’s way of working, with increased flexibility being greatly desired by employees. Earlier on in the year, a number of organisations trialled the concept of a 4-day working week – which has clearly been a success for many.Legal Update
Coming of age
Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021.
Press Release
Browne Jacobson helps launch new innovative council company network with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School
Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.
Published Article
Starling Bank employment tribunal
The outcome of the Employment Tribunal claim brought by Gulnaz Raja against Starling Bank Limited (1) (Starling), and Matthew Newman (2) was reported last month.