Browne Jacobson's private client team top Chambers High Net Worth Guide rankings again
Browne Jacobson’s private client practice has been ranked as Band One in the 2022 Chambers and Partners High Net Worth Guide for its work in private wealth law.
Browne Jacobson’s private client practice has been ranked as Band One in the 2022 Chambers and Partners High Net Worth Guide for its work in private wealth law. The guide is an independent and in-depth review that recognises lawyers and law firms operating in the international private wealth management space.
In addition, three lawyers from the team have been ranked as notable practitioners including partner and head of the private client practice, Lucy Worwood who is ranked in Band One and is rated “very highly” and praised for doing “a great job”, whilst partner Wenna Thompson, who is also ranked in Band One is considered as “always a pleasure to work with”. Partner Imogen Holmes is also ranked in Band Two.
The practice is made up of 10 specialist lawyers across the firm’s Nottingham and London offices but works nationally with a diverse client base made up of families, wealthy individuals, land-owners, entrepreneurs, investors, trustees, accountants, independent financial advisors and other professionals, both on and offshore.
The team provides specialist legal advice on wills, tax planning, succession and estate planning, trust advice and administration, probate and powers of attorney, specialist advice on commercial trusts and non-approved pension schemes.
The practice is also ranked tier 1 by Legal 500 and regarded by Chambers & Partners.
Lucy commented on the rankings: These rankings are testament to the high-quality advice we consistently deliver and the strong effective relationships we have built with our diverse and fantastic clients over the years.
“Our established team work on highly complex and highly sensitive matters that require a real understanding of our clients’ personal circumstances and the various commercial markets in which they operate. I believe that this is what we have become known for and why we are considered a real legal player in the private client space.”
Contact
Henrietta Scott
Head of Marketing
henrietta.scott@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 2299
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Contentious private client roundup – 2023
Opinion
Landowner fined £15,000 after public attacked by cows
Legal Update
Polluters to face unlimited penalties under new legislation
Legal Update
Mutual wills – case update 2023
Press Release
Browne Jacobson grows inheritance and trust dispute practice with partner hire
Legal Update
BNG update – BNG and tax implications: Government call for evidence
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain — Government publishes consultation response
Legal Update
The importance of understanding the transitional provisions under the Electronic Communications Code
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain: positive for nature and an opportunity for landowners
Press Release - Firm news
Browne Jacobson's private client team top Chambers High Net Worth Guide rankings again
Browne Jacobson’s private client practice has been ranked as Band One in the 2022 Chambers and Partners High Net Worth Guide for its work in private wealth law.
Legal Update
Conservation Covenants – what are they and how will they affect you?
Legal Update
Wynne-Finch and others v Natural Resources Body for Wales [2021] EWCA Civ 1473
Historic exceptions of mines and minerals did not include mudstone, the common rock of the district.
Published Article
Adverse possession and registered land (Dowse v Bradford MBC)
The Land Registration Act 2002 radically changed the law of adverse possession in relation to registered land.
Opinion - Future Lawyer blog
A day in the life of a private client and charities trainee
Gavin Lock gives a view into working for Browne Jacobson's private clients and charities team.
Legal Update
Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v Ashloch Ltd and another [2019] UKUT 338 (LC)
The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) could not impose rights under the Electronic Communications Code 2017 where the operator’s expired lease was protected by Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.
Opinion
A brief update on probate
A new online system for probate applications was introduced in early October 2019, which will allow us to process and track applications for grants of probate online.
Legal Update
Real estate quarterly update – July to September 2019
The latest real estate update aimed at in house lawyers (and other professionals) practising in the property / real estate sector.
Legal Update
Stanning v Baldwin and another [2019] EWHC 1350 (Ch)
Issues about prescriptive rights of way and drainage arose on the redevelopment of dominant land.
Opinion
The importance of three magic words: subject to contract
A recent case illustrates the importance of ensuring that all emails discussing the terms of a proposed acquisition are headed ‘subject to contract’.
Legal Update
Property quarterly update – April to June 2019
The latest property quarterly update aimed at in house lawyers (and other professionals) practising in the property / real estate sector.
Legal Update
Windsor-Clive, Earl of Plymouth and others v Rees and another [2019] EWHC 1008 (Ch)
A widely drafted landlord’s reservation of a right of entry was given a narrow interpretation by the court.
Legal Update
Legally binding target for net-zero emissions by 2050
Last month the government’s advisory Committee on Climate Change published a report urging the government to commit to cutting greenhouse gases by 100% by 2050 when compared to 1990 emissions (known as net-zero).
Training
The impact of Brexit on environmental law
Brexit has brought with it a great deal of uncertainty for environmental law.
Legal Update
Thorpe v Frank and another [2019] EWCA Civ 150
Repaving of land was sufficient evidence on its own to establish a claim for adverse possession of that land.
Legal Update
O’Byrne Re Land at Tubney, Manor Farm [2018] UKUT 395 (LC) and Roberts v Parker and another [2019] EWCA Civ 121
A couple of cases on the interpretation of easements create no new law, but illustrate a couple of important points.
Legal Update
Oakley and others v Harper McKay Developments Ltd [2018] EWHC 3405 (Ch)
Failing to assign the copyright in plans on or before completion could have meant that a seller’s notice to complete was invalid.
Legal Update
Taurusbuild Ltd and others v McQue and another [2019] UKUT 81 (LC)
The Upper Tribunal turns conventional wisdom on its head by ruling that an easement could be implied into a mortgage of part under the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows.
Training
State aid and IP in R&D agreements - hear from our panel of experts
As private businesses, public bodies and universities alike strive to gain a competitive advantage, each increasingly look to each other to develop next generation products and services.
Legal Update
A binding legacy for future landowners: Conservation Covenants
The Government has launched a consultation to consider the introduction of 'Conservation Covenants'.