0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

watch this space on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility

22 July 2019

The concept of Assumption of Responsibility is on many stakeholders’ minds at the moment following the Supreme Court decision in CN & GN v Poole.

We anticipate that asserting a cross over between Assumption of Responsibility and Vicarious Liability could become increasingly prevalent. With the outsourcing of public services, contractual issues will also enter the mix.

Last month in Ohoud Al Najar & Ors v Cumberland Hotel Ltd [2019] EWHC 1593 (QB) the court found that an hotel assumed a responsibility to take reasonable care to protect guests from the criminal acts of third parties. In this case a thief had been disturbed and had violently attacked these guests. However the court found that the assumed duty was not absolute; it was simply to take reasonable care. On the facts the Defendant had not breached any duty to these claimants; its security systems and procedures were sufficient but would not exclude every unfortunate eventuality.

Next week the Supreme Court will be handing down judgement in X v Kuoni Travel. X was raped by a uniformed hotel electrician who had offered to show her a shortcut to reception, but had led her to an engineering room where the rape had taken place. The issue the Supreme Court will rule on is whether a travel company can be liable for 'improper performance' of the contract and Package Travel, Package Holidays and Package Tours Regulations (SI 1992/3288). We suspect the outcome will be dependent on a detailed analysis of the pleaded facts. Our briefing note on the case and the possible impact on Defendants facing assault and abuse claims will follow next week.

related opinions

Discount rate remains negative

The much anticipated revision of the discount rate has arrived with the Lord Chancellor, David Gauke, announcing that it will be fixed at -0.25%.

View blog

Clarification by the court on causation and loss in brokers negligence claims

The UK court has recently clarified the law in relation to causation and loss in broker’s negligence claims in the case of Dalamd Limited v Butterworth Spengler Commercial Limited [2018] EWHC 2558.

View blog

Reflecting on the standard of care owed by an injured child and their parent

Caine Steven John Ellis v Paul Kelly & Violet Ellis (2018) highlights the challenges and sensitivities in alleging fault on the part of a child and parent in circumstances where the primary cause of an accident rests with a third party.

View blog

Applying QOCS protection in a claim for personal injury and something else

In The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Brown [2018], the High Court ruled that a Circuit Judge was wrong to automatically apply QOCS protection to a claim for misuse of data which also included a claim for personal injury.

View blog

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up