The long-awaited publication of the Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021 provides universities with opportunities to generate additional income and build upon the quality of their research output.
The long-awaited publication of the Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021 provides universities with opportunities to generate additional income and build upon the quality of their research output. Selina Hinchliffe summarises how research has been assessed and represented in the REF 2021 before considering some of the commercial opportunities that these results may offer higher education institutions.
The REF 2021 results indicate the quality of research work being carried out at UK universities. Greater quality is attributed to research that is world-leading, and lesser quality is attributed to research that is only nationally recognised. The objective of this exercise is to ensure that public spending on university research (circa £2 billion per annum) is worthwhile.
Research submitted by universities has been assessed in three ways:
The REF data shows that there has been a 46% increase in the number of staff submitted to REF by universities, as compared to the REF 2014 results. Although this may suggest that universities have invested more heavily in researchers, in reality, this is a skewed increase. In REF 2014 universities could, to some extent, ‘cherry-pick’ the researchers they submitted. For REF 2021, the submission regulations changed, and universities have been required to submit all their researchers who have “significant responsibility for research”.
The weighting for Impact has been increased from 20% to 25% since REF 2014. This highlights the increasing importance placed on the “change or benefit to the economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment or quality of life, beyond academia”. A key example of the importance of impact is the Oxford University AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, which has massively benefited society and health.
157 UK higher education institutions submitted 185,594 pieces of research, with the outcomes shown below.
|
4 stars (world leading) |
3 stars (internationally excellent) |
2 stars (internationally recognised) |
1 star (nationally recognised) |
Outputs |
36% |
47% |
15% |
2% |
|
4 stars (outstanding) |
3 stars (very considerable) |
2 stars (considerable) |
1 star (recognised but modest) |
Impact |
50% |
38% |
11% |
2% |
|
4 stars (capable of producing world leading quality and outstanding impact) |
3 stars (capable of producing internationally excellent quality and enabling very considerable impact ) |
Other |
Research Environment |
50% |
37% |
13% |
The high level of world leading and internationally excellent work, with an outstanding or very considerable impact, suggests that universities are producing research that can be very successfully commercialised.
The commercialisation of the intellectual property (“IP”) within this research can be achieved, most commonly, in one of three ways:
The above models each have pros and cons, for instance:
We have produced extensive webinars on the topic of commercialisation, including:
The REF has permitted universities to make joint submissions – i.e. where two or more universities develop research in collaboration and are joint owners/co-owners of the IP. It is important to take the time to expressly deal with the IP considerations of joint ownership at the outset to avoid disputes regarding ownership in the future.
The share that each co-owner holds in the IP can depend on what type of IP right it is (e.g. co-owners of IP protected by a patent tend to have equal shares) and how much of a contribution each party has made (e.g. where IP is protected by a copyright, the courts have on occasion found co-owners to have unequal shares, on the basis that some co-owner contributions were more substantial than others).
The most important co-ownership consideration is that, unless otherwise agreed, no co-owner can assign or licence the IP to a third party without the consent of all the co-owners. Any co-owner that has not consented may be able to take infringement action.
As the three aforementioned commercialisation models all involve the licensing out of IP, this need for co-owner consent limits commercialisation where co-owners have diverging priorities; for instance, where one co-owner envisages the commercial success of the IP, but another co-owner prefers to limit the IP exploitation to internal research and development to retain an ‘edge’ in the R&D market.
Therefore, it is important to expressly set out the rights that each co-owner has in relation to the IP at the outset of any joint endeavour, including (as a bare minimum) whether co-owner consent needed:
This article is a brief overview and there is much to consider when commercialising IP or embarking on a joint R&D venture. If you would like to know more, please contact Selina Hinchliffe.
There’s been little evidence of interventions or financial management reviews this year and it appears the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) has re-focussed on financial delivery. It’s also telling that there were no discernible changes to the reporting of financial irregularities in the Academies Trust Handbook 2022.
The Children’s Commissioner, Rachel De Souza, has recently published a report “Beyond the labels: a SEND system which works for every child, every time”, which she intends to sit alongside the DfE’s SEND Review (2019) and SEND Green Paper (2022) and which she hopes will put children’s voices at the heart of the government’s review of SEND system.
There’s greater opportunity than ever for parents, carers and guardians to voice any concerns they have relating to their child’s education and for their concerns to be heard and to be taken seriously. While most staff in schools and academies are conscious of their legal duties relating to complaints management, many are struggling to cope with such a significant increase in the volume of complaints they must manage.
We’re pleased to collaborate with Lloyds Bank, who recently asked us and audit and risk specialists Crowe UK to offer guidance that academy trusts would find helpful when considering setting up a trading subsidiary.
The DfE has published new guidance and opened the application process for window two of the Trust Capacity Fund (TCaF) for 2022/2023, with a fund of £86m in trust capacity funding focused particularly on education investment areas.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse was established in March 2015. We now have its report. As you would expect with such a broad scope, the report is long and makes a number of far-reaching recommendations. In this article, Dai Durbridge highlights seven of the 20 recommendations, sets out how they could impact on schools and suggests what steps to take now.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has been named as winner of the ‘Legal Advisors to Education Institutions’ category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.
Since the new Suspensions and Exclusions Statutory Guidance was published, we have received a lot of questions about the use of managed moves. For the first time, the Statutory Guidance does explain what a managed move is, but in relatively broad terms and does not cover the mechanics of how a managed move should operate.
Over 3000 young people from across the UK and Ireland took part in a virtual legal careers insight event, aimed at making the legal profession more diverse.
Holly Quirk, an associate barrister in Browne Jacobson’s Manchester office, was awarded the Legal Professional of the Year Award at this year’s Manchester Young Talent Awards.
The risk of assault against staff is, sadly, something that all schools need to consider carefully. Here one legal expert explains what they can do to protect staff and ensure they fulfil their duty of care.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has again been confirmed as a national powerhouse after securing five Tier 1 rankings relating to Education in the latest edition of Legal 500 and maintaining a Band 1 UK-wide ranking for Education in Chambers & Partners UK 2023.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
In this article we set out the criteria, expectations and support schools should consider if notified they fall within this new category.
The words “Grammar schools” are once again being whispered in government and the question of whether the creation of new grammar schools will finally be implemented as a central focus to DFE policy has re-surfaced.