Twitter facing employment claims following mass redundancies
News that Twitter is being threatened with multiple claims by UK employees following mass redundancies provides a reminder of the risks that comes with an employer implementing large scale redundancy exercises.
News that Twitter is being threatened with multiple claims by UK employees following mass redundancies provides a reminder of the risks that comes with an employer implementing large scale redundancy exercises.
Following Twitter’s highly publicised takeover by Elon Musk in 2022, the company immediately took steps to drastically reduce its global headcount with suggestions that it has halved its previous staff of 7,500 since the acquisition. In the UK, 180 employees were dismissed in a mass redundancy exercise in early November 2022 with at least 43 now pursuing the company alleging their dismissal was unlawful.
Publicly, Twitter has justified the need for the reduction in staff on the basis that the company is required to make significant savings in order to continue to operate. Significant numbers of claims in the UK by dismissed employees, added to reports of other mass actions taken by staff in other countries, has the potential to undermine the costs savings that were expected as a result of significant staff reductions.
In the UK Twitter is accused of conducting a “sham redundancy” process including failures to consult staff before dismissals were implemented and an attempt to retrospectively justify immediate dismissals implemented without warning.
It remains to be seen whether or not the allegations by dismissed staff in the UK will end up in Employment Tribunal claims or settlements will be agreed. Other employers considering large scale redundancy exercises should be mindful of the potential fall out of a failure to adhere to laws including a requirement for minimum periods of consultation prior to dismissal.
Whilst the need for financial savings may be a significant driver for redundancies being implemented, employers should also be mindful of the need to be able to demonstrate the particular rationale for implementing particular redundancies. It is unlikely that a need to save money, genuine as that may be, will be sufficient to justify a failure to adhere to procedures or to explain the reasons for the redundancies themselves.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Autumn statement 2023 – key take outs for employers
Opinion
Collective bargaining rights
In Person Event
Mock Employment Tribunal: for NHS and independent health
Opinion
Agency cover and strike action
Published Article
Infrastructure and social value in public contracts – making it concrete
Opinion
Updates in equality – An overview of new regulations
Opinion
Minimum Service Levels and reasonable steps – consultation response
Legal Update
Holiday entitlement and pay: Reforms ahead
Legal Update
A positive duty to prevent sexual harassment
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Care Fertility Group on acquisition of CRGW
Opinion
Bonus clawback provisions: Clear and reasonable
Opinion
Third party intervention did not break the chain of causation in whistleblowing detriment claim
Opinion
Holiday pay claims: A series of deductions
Opinion
Monitoring workers – ICO guidance
Press Release
Browne Jacobson strengthens employment team with key partner hire
Legal Update
Greater predictability over terms for workers
Guide
Transforming EDI practices in UK insurance
Opinion
Minimum service levels and reasonable steps
Opinion
Modern slavery in the care sector – how employers can manage risks
Legal Update
Defending equal pay claims: Equal pay for equal work?
Opinion
Government response to Pregnancy Loss Review recommends actions for NHS employers
Opinion
Right to request flexible working – changes ahead for employers
Legal Update
Employment Healthcare Briefing - July 2023
Opinion
Are teacher strikes coming to an end?
Opinion
Further consultants strike announced following government pay offer
Opinion
Watering down workplace harassment proposals
Opinion
Agency worker cover during strikes
Press Release
Law firm advises on MBO of insolvency and restructuring firm Bridgewood backed by DSW Capital
Legal Update
Glass ceilings and workplaces
Opinion
EU standstill provisions maintained allowing the NHS to retain and employ healthcare workers
Legal Update
School leaders survey – the results are in!
Legal Update
Employment alternative dispute resolution
Opinion
NHS Long Term Workforce Plan unveiled
Legal Update
Parental leave and pay - gender equality?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise on international sale of entertainment company Music For Pets
Opinion
New ACAS guidance on 'Whistleblowing at work'
Opinion
Carer's Leave Bill set to become law
Opinion
New rights for working parents and carers
Opinion
The NHS pay deal – are all Agenda for Change staff eligible?
