In the rapidly moving new world of subsidy control law, there’s been several major developments over the last few weeks, as Government looks to start providing more detailed assistance to public authorities in navigating the new legislative regime established by the Subsidy Control Act.
In the rapidly moving new world of subsidy control law, there’s been several major developments over the last few weeks, as Government looks to start providing more detailed assistance to public authorities in navigating the new legislative regime established by the Subsidy Control Act.
The most important development has been the publication by the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) of draft statutory guidance on the Act itself (the final version of which public authorities will have to have regard to when granting a subsidy pursuant to section 79 of the Act), along with a consultation on the draft guidance. The draft guidance is very lengthy and detailed extending to nearly 200 pages and covers practically every element of the new Act, from guidance around whether support being given will constitute a subsidy in the first place, to how to satisfy the Subsidy Control Principles outlined in section 12 of the Act. The consultation document is (mercifully) shorter and contains only six questions that can be responded to. These are very broad including providing comments on the overall structure of the draft guidance, to whether there is any additional guidance that can be added. It is also notable that there is a question asking whether further support beyond the guidance would be beneficial (with options like “teach-in sessions” being mentioned).
In addition to the BEIS guidance and consultation document, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has also published its own consultation and guidance in relation to its specific role in the new subsidy control regime. As you may well be aware, the CMA has a host of functions prescribed under Part 4 of the Act and is intending to discharge these functions through its new Subsidy Advice Unit (SAU). The primary role of the new SAU is to provide specific advice to public authorities on subsidies referred to it (either by a voluntary or mandatory referral as outlined in the Act). The consultation document seems to focus quite heavily on the reporting process itself and how practically this will work, as well as how the SAU will assess subsidies referred to it against subsidy control requirements. The questions subject to consultation are not immediately obvious but can be found on Page 5 of the consultation/guidance document.
We will be providing more detailed opinions on both the BEIS and CMA consultation and guidance in the coming weeks, but it is worth noting that the deadline for responses for both consultations is the 10 August 2022.
Associate
karl.edwards@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)3300452997
Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Announced in September but scrapped on 17 November the investment zone proposals were very short lived. The proposal has now morphed into the proposal for a smaller number of clustered zones earmarked for investment.
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
In ‘failure to remove’ claims, the claimant alleges abuse in the family home and asserts that the local authority should have known about the abuse and/or that they should have removed the claimant from the family home and into care earlier.
Across the UK, homelessness is an urgent crisis, and one that is set to grow amid the rising cost of living. Local authorities are at the forefront of responding to this crisis, but with a lack of properties that are suitable for social housing across the UK, vulnerable individuals and families are often housed in temporary accommodation.
Updates include UK Shared Prosperity Fund, contracts, Subsidy Control Bill, data controller liability, Government Covid-19 procurement and Highway Code revisions.
The complex and rather nebulous transitional subsidy control regime set out in the UK-EU Trade and Co-operation Agreement and the UK’s wider international commitments has made it difficult for public authorities and those working with them to proceed with certainty where subsidies are involved.
Investment zones have been introduced by the Conservative party to get the United Kingdom (UK) ‘working, building and growing’. They are to be designated sites which provide time-limited tax incentives, streamlined planning rules and wider support for local growth to encourage investment and accelerate the development of housing and infrastructure that the UK needs to drive economic growth. Processes and requirements that slow down development will be stripped back with the intention of attracting new investment.
