School admissions are a highly emotive subject. With education often at the heart of a local community, the process can leave schools open to critique and legal disputes. To ensure where possible, the best outcome for the school and individual preparation is essential.
School admissions are a highly emotive subject. With education often at the heart of a local community, the process can leave schools open to critique and legal disputes. To ensure where possible, the best outcome for the school and individual preparation is essential.
As the 2019 admissions deadline approaches, our advisory specialist Dai Durbridge shares his top tips to help you prepare for any appeals that come your way.
The Admissions Appeals Code requires admission authorities to take a number of steps, and to make certain information available to parents before appeal hearings. Doing so compliantly and efficiently is important, as is getting your preparation done to ensure you put your best case forward and the hearings run smoothly.
The Code is clear on what must be set out in the timetable. The appeals process and supporting timetable must be published on responsible admission authorities’ websites by 28 February. This date is set in stone, so our advice is to get the timetable ready well in advance and get it on the website in early February each year.
The code allows parents to make reasonable requests for information which they need to help them prepare their case. Many parents take advantage of this and often search online for lists of questions to ask; the key is to be prepared for them. To make life easier, draft an FAQ and make it freely available to appellants.
The questions you should seek to answer in your FAQ’s should come from three sources:
Your FAQ’s needs to be a living document, updated every year - removing questions that are no longer relevant and to adding in new ones as appropriate. It is likely that you end up with a long list of questions, so consider breaking it down into categories.
We actively encourage our clients to share best practice; openly sharing their FAQ document with others, whilst also reviewing local authority and other providers’ websites to see what questions they have answered and how.
A prejudice statement is the most important document referenced in the appeals process, so much so that we’ve given it a section of its own (below) to help ensure that your statement is fit for purpose.
Prior to the hearing you need to review and highlight areas of challenge in the appellants’ cases, alongside your own prejudice statement. This will help support your position that the school’s prejudice is greater than that of the appellant.
It is the admission authorities’ responsibility to train the panel and the clerk to adequately manage the appeal. It is also in the best interests of your school and the individuals involved and so it is important that you take your responsibility seriously. A panel lacking knowledge and/or a clerk lacking the confidence to competently manage the hearing can be seriously detrimental. To ensure the smooth and efficient running of the appeals, formal training is critical.
For all appeals that are not linked to an infant class, a prejudice statement must be drafted by the admission authority to set out why the school cannot take further pupils. It is the most important document referred to during the appeal, and the one upon which your position will succeed or fail.
At the hearing, the panel will consider whether the admission of additional children would prejudice the provision of efficient education or the efficient use of resources at the school. In other words, the panel will balance the prejudice to the school against the appellant’s case by looking at the:
Your prejudice statement may run over a number of pages. To make sure the key points are understood include an executive summary on the first page so that panel can be easily reminded of your position.
If the appeal hearing is not taking place at your school then you need to ensure the panel understand the context of your case. Set the scene by including details of the physical layout, build period, classroom design and the community it serves. This will enable the panel to appreciate the reality of your school.
As well as the background and compliance points, you need to include detail such as the number on roll (for the past few years), current school population and the impact of the Fair Access Protocol. To keep it easy to read, split it off into headings that naturally flow.
Just like the FAQs, the format of a good prejudice statement and the principles underpinning its content can apply to many admission authorities. Don’t be afraid to share yours or to ask others to share theirs.
You’ll get the chance to read your statement at the hearing and are then likely to face questions from the panel and the parents. You need to know every bit of it so you can answer questions confidently and consistently. Invest time before the day of the hearings to make sure you know your case.
Hopefully by now you’ll have got your pre-hearing steps sorted and have drafted a cracking prejudice statement; now you need to get the appeal hearing right.
You are allowed to and, if you have the space to hold it there, we recommend that you do so. Whilst it saves the cost of hiring a venue, the primary benefit is it gives the clerk and the panel a feel for your school, including how busy it can get, the layout, age and design more generally.
Your presenting officer is the face and voice of the school at the appeal. They need to know the school inside out, be able to answer the questions posed by parents and the panel and set out the content of the prejudice statement with knowledge and conviction.
Make sure you have the key documents with you at the hearing. You need both codes, your admission policy, your prejudice statement and the various appellant cases.
A well-trained clerk will ensure the hearing runs smoothly and if needed, keep the panel in check. If they are not forthcoming with managing the panel, you should ask the clerk to step in.
You’ve drafted a really good prejudice statement so don’t be afraid to use it. Read it out in the hearing, highlighting the key parts (the strongest elements) and address the panel when doing so.
The panel and parents will have questions for you. Answer them all and be consistent across appeals for the same year. If you have answered a question pre-hearing, make that point but also restate the answer so as you appear helpful, open and consistent.
After the prejudice statement, this is the most important part of the hearing. You will have highlighted areas of challenge in your pre-hearing prep and now is the time to put those challenges to the parent. Naturally this is an emotive issue for parents but this can lead to some embellishment in their case. It is your job (along with that of the panel) to get clarity. Remember – this is all about your prejudice being greater and challenging the appellant case to evidence that.
By following our top tips we hope that you will successfully manage your position and any appeals that come your way. If however, you would like the support of one of our experts to ensure the process runs smoothly, we are delighted to offer a range of fixed price and bespoke solutions to meet your requirements. These include:
Partner
dai.durbridge@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 2105
Regardless of the outcome of ballots on industrial action, unless there is drastic change to funding for schools in relation to pay increases, it will be unusual to find any organisational budget that is not impacted by the current economic situation.
There’s been little evidence of interventions or financial management reviews this year and it appears the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) has re-focussed on financial delivery. It’s also telling that there were no discernible changes to the reporting of financial irregularities in the Academies Trust Handbook 2022.
The Children’s Commissioner, Rachel De Souza, has recently published a report “Beyond the labels: a SEND system which works for every child, every time”, which she intends to sit alongside the DfE’s SEND Review (2019) and SEND Green Paper (2022) and which she hopes will put children’s voices at the heart of the government’s review of SEND system.
As well as providing day-to-day support to help you focus on managing your settings, we also provide training and professional development on a range of topics to keep you and your staff up-to-date.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHCR) recently issued new, non-statutory guidance regarding the wearing of natural or protective hairstyles, specifically in reference to their representation in uniform, behaviour or standalone appearance policies.
Emma Hughes, head of HR services at Browne Jacobson, explains how CST’s updated executive pay report and the linked benchmarking service from XpertHR can help trust boards make robust decisions on pay.
There’s greater opportunity than ever for parents, carers and guardians to voice any concerns they have relating to their child’s education and for their concerns to be heard and to be taken seriously. While most staff in schools and academies are conscious of their legal duties relating to complaints management, many are struggling to cope with such a significant increase in the volume of complaints they must manage.
This guidance has been prepared to support academy trusts (Trusts) who want to hold a fully virtual Annual General Meeting (AGM) or a hybrid AGM, as we know that Trusts may want to be prepared for future disruption as well as having a general interest in holding more meetings virtually. The guidance also applies to other meetings of the Members (known as General Meetings).
We’re pleased to collaborate with Lloyds Bank, who recently asked us and audit and risk specialists Crowe UK to offer guidance that academy trusts would find helpful when considering setting up a trading subsidiary.
The DfE has published new guidance and opened the application process for window two of the Trust Capacity Fund (TCaF) for 2022/2023, with a fund of £86m in trust capacity funding focused particularly on education investment areas.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse was established in March 2015. We now have its report. As you would expect with such a broad scope, the report is long and makes a number of far-reaching recommendations. In this article, Dai Durbridge highlights seven of the 20 recommendations, sets out how they could impact on schools and suggests what steps to take now.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has been named as winner of the ‘Legal Advisors to Education Institutions’ category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.
Since the new Suspensions and Exclusions Statutory Guidance was published, we have received a lot of questions about the use of managed moves. For the first time, the Statutory Guidance does explain what a managed move is, but in relatively broad terms and does not cover the mechanics of how a managed move should operate.
Over 3000 young people from across the UK and Ireland took part in a virtual legal careers insight event, aimed at making the legal profession more diverse.
Holly Quirk, an associate barrister in Browne Jacobson’s Manchester office, was awarded the Legal Professional of the Year Award at this year’s Manchester Young Talent Awards.
The risk of assault against staff is, sadly, something that all schools need to consider carefully. Here one legal expert explains what they can do to protect staff and ensure they fulfil their duty of care.
An engineering company in Tyne and Wear was fined £20,000 after a worker fractured his pelvis and suffered internal injuries after falling through a petrol station forecourt canopy, whilst he was replacing the guttering.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has again been confirmed as a national powerhouse after securing five Tier 1 rankings relating to Education in the latest edition of Legal 500 and maintaining a Band 1 UK-wide ranking for Education in Chambers & Partners UK 2023.
