0370 270 6000

Flexibility Over Flexible Working Procedure

13 December 2021

Under the statutory flexible working procedure, the “decision period” in which the employer must notify the employee of the outcome of their application (including dealing with any appeal) is three months or such longer period as is agreed between the employer and employee. Any agreement to extend the period must be made before the original period ends, or with retrospective effect within three months of the end of it. 

In Walsh v National Rail Infrastructure Limited, the EAT was asked to consider whether, by agreeing to an appeal hearing outside of the original decision period, the employee had implicitly agreed to extend the decision period. The Tribunal in this case considered that the decision period had been extended by agreement and, as it was still running at the time the claim was made, it did not have jurisdiction to consider the Claimant’s claim. The EAT disagreed with the Tribunal’s findings – agreeing to an appeal hearing outside of the decision period was not the same as agreeing to extend that decision period; there were many reasons why an employee might wish the appeal to still go ahead despite the decision period having ended. Although agreement to extend was not required in any particular format (i.e. it did not need to be in writing), there did need to be a specific agreement to the extension, including an agreement over the period of that extension.

Flexible working applications can take many forms but the pandemic has resulted in a significant increase in the number of individuals working from home or under a hybrid model. A September 2020 YouGov survey indicated that the majority of employees in Great Britain wanted to continue working from home some or all of the time after the pandemic. Both CIPD and Acas have published guidance to support employers in dealing with hybrid working arrangements and links can be found here:

CIPD - Hybrid Working - Practical Guidance

Acas - Hybrid Working - Guidance for Employers    

Related opinions

‘Gay cake’ discrimination case ruled inadmissible by ECHR

This case has been rumbling on for over seven years. It relates to a bakery’s refusal to make a cake with the slogan ‘support gay marriage’.

View blog

High Court demonstrates importance of well-drafted restrictive covenants as enforcement succeeds “in its entirety”

Restrictive covenants restrict what employees can do for certain periods of time following termination of the employee’s employment. Employers should review restrictive covenants whenever an employee, director, or consultant changes their role.

View blog

SMEs can claim back sick pay from government

To support businesses during the recent surge in coronavirus cases, the Government will be reintroducing the Statutory Sick Pay Rebate Scheme.

View blog

Disability Workforce Reporting Consultation

This consultation forms part of the government’s National Disability Strategy published in July 2021 and is in response to calls to increase transparency on disability in the workplace. It includes consideration of mandatory and voluntary reporting practices, looking at what is working well, and what changes could be made to increase inclusive practices.

View blog

Sarah Hooton

Sarah Hooton

Professional Development Lawyer

View profile

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up