0370 270 6000

Supreme Court confirms that sleep ins are not working time

22 March 2021

The Supreme Court judgment represents the conclusion on whether or not “sleep in time” should be classified as working time, when calculating the National Minimum Wage (NMW).

Mrs Tomlinson-Blake was a care worker, required to work a sleep-in shift from 10pm to 7am. She could sleep, keeping a “listening ear” for the two vulnerable adults she supported. She would provide assistance during the night, although she was only awoken occasionally. For each shift, she was paid a flat rate of £22.35, plus one hour’s pay of £6.70.

The lower tribunals found for Tomlinson-Blake, finding she should receive the NMW for each hour of the shift. The Court of Appeal disagreed, as Tomlinson-Blake was only “available for work”. The NMW was only due when the employee was awake. Tomlinson-Blake appealed.

The Supreme Court, in dismissing Tomlinson-Blake’s appeal, considered the relevant legislation and the recommendations of the Low Pay Commission to the government. It ruled that when a worker is permitted to sleep during their shift and only required to respond to emergencies, only those hours the worker is awake and undertaking duties need be included in the NMW calculation.

Clearly, this long anticipated judgment will be of particular relief to employers in the care sector but is of wider interest to any employer with workers working in this way.

Related opinions

Revoking and reforming EU law

The Government has published the Retained EU Revocation and Reform Bill which, if passed, provides for the revocation of all “EU-derived subordinate legislation” (i.e. UK statutory instruments which were introduced to implement EU law) and retained direct EU legislation on 31 December 2023, unless legislation is specifically introduced to save them.

View blog

Gender equality

Randstad has published a report on gender equality in the workplace based upon survey responses from 6,000 workers within the construction, education, healthcare and technology sectors. Whilst legislation relating to sex discrimination has been around for over 45 years, nearly three quarters of female workers surveyed reported that they had either experienced or witnessed inappropriate behaviour or comments from male colleagues.

View blog

Unfavourable treatment

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s recent decision in the case of Mr Michael Cowie & Others v Scottish Fire and Rescue Service provides a useful insight into favourable - or unfavourable - treatment in the context of discrimination claims.

View blog

Cameras in convenience stores: a potential hornet’s nest..?

A convenience retailer has opted to install cameras (the “Facewatch” system) at a limited number of its English stores to reduce crime and protect its staff.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up