0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

is it reasonable to dismiss an employee without any prior procedure being followed as a result of a breakdown in relations?

25 August 2020

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld the Employment Tribunal’s (ET) finding that a dismissal may be fair despite no prior procedure being followed. In the case in question, Gallacher v Abellio Scotrail Ltd, the EAT accepted this rare decision on the basis that following a procedure may have made matters worse.

The Respondent was facing tough trading conditions at the time and required the Claimant, Ms Gallacher, and her manager to work together in harmony. However, the Claimant and her manager, both senior members of staff, experienced a breakdown in their working relationship. This was caused by salary negotiations, issues around on-call working and staffing. This ultimately resulted in the Claimant being dismissed during her annual performance review due to a lack of trust.

The Claimant brought a claim for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination (symptoms in connection with menopause and depression), however the ET concluded the reason for her dismissal was the irretrievable breakdown in her working relationship with her manager. The ET determined that to have followed any process may have been futile, and so the decision to dismiss without any prior procedure being followed was fair. After appealing to the EAT, on the grounds that she was not given prior notice that dismissal was being considered or the opportunity to appeal the decision, the Claimant’s appeal was dismissed. The decision to dismiss fell within the range of reasonable responses open to the employer under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

In the majority of tribunal cases, where no procedure is followed before dismissal, this would place the dismissal was outside the band of reasonable responses and therefore be unfair. However, this case shows that there can be exceptions to the general rule.

It should be emphasised that this is a rare case and if faced with similar circumstances, employers should be satisfied they have taken legal advice before dismissing an employee on the basis of an irretrievable breakdown. The employer should at the very least meet with the employee to talk to them about the situation, before any dismissal takes place.

related opinions

Furloughed employees entitled to full pay for redundancy purposes

The government has brought in new legislation to ensure that any employees who have been furloughed will have their statutory redundancy pay calculated based on their full-time wages as opposed their furloughed pay in the event that they are made redundant.

View blog

Return to work – all change or more of the same?

The Government has announced that its workplace guidance will change with effect from 1 August and its “work from home” message will be removed.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up