0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

new statutory sick pay regulations

1 April 2020

Please note: the information contained in this legal update is correct as of the original date of publication

The Statutory Sick Pay (Coronavirus) (Suspension of Waiting Days and General Amendment) Regulations 2020 have now been published and came into force on 28 March 2020.

The new Regulations remove the three-day waiting period for SSP and provide more clarity for employers as to when this will apply. The clarity comprises of 3 main elements:

  1. It creates certainty over when an employee can claim statutory sick pay in relation to coronavirus and sets out specific examples.
  2. It clearly sets out the symptoms of coronavirus but allows for changes without the need for new regulations.
  3. It removes the 8-month time limit included within the previous recent SSP amendment regulations.

1. Isolating due to Coronavirus

The Regulations includes specific scenarios as to when individuals can claim statutory sick pay. These include where:

  • An individual has symptoms of coronavirus (however mild) and is staying at home for 7 days beginning with the day symptoms started.
  • An individual who lives with someone who has symptoms and is staying home to isolate for 14 days.
  • An individual who was within b) above but who is now isolating as they have developed symptoms of coronavirus, and is staying at home for 7 days, beginning with the day the symptoms started.

Employees will need to fit into one of these scenarios to be able to claim SSP.

2. Symptoms of Coronavirus

The Regulations also sets out the symptoms of coronavirus. As expected, they reiterate the current government guidance of a continuous cough; a high temperature; and both a continuous cough and a high temperature. However, the definition also includes any other symptoms as may be specified by the Chief Medical Officer. The definition may therefore be subject to change if new information about the virus becomes available or if the virus was to evolve or mutate.

3. Removal of the 8 month time limit

The Regulations remove the 8-month expiry date imposed by the changes earlier this month. The new changes to SSP are therefore in force until further notice with plans to keep this under constant review. This may well indicate that the current Government view is that the situation will continue for a significant period.

Although this legislation implements what was promised some time ago, employers now have some certainty about what SSP they should be paying. As indicated within the Coronavirus Act 2020, these Regulations are retrospective, covering the particular types of self-isolation on or after 13 March 2020. Employers who therefore previously paid sick-pay starting from day 4 for these absences will therefore need to ensure that a back-payment is made, covering the first three days.

Coronavirus support

We are helping across business, health, education and government sectors:

related opinions

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

Furlough scheme extended to October

The Chancellor announced on Tuesday 12th May 2020 that the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) is to be extended to the end of October.

View blog

Furlough and insolvency – are employees protected?

As more retailers and restauranteurs fall victim to insolvency, the Court of Appeal has confirmed that the contracts of employment of employees furloughed before a company is placed into administration will be treated as having been adopted by its administrators, therefore entitling the employees to “super-priority” status over other creditors.

View blog

High Court extends employer’s duty of care to Dubai whistleblower

Employers with global networks which include a base in the UK should be aware that they can face expensive and damaging negligence claims from employees who are based overseas regardless of the whistleblowing regime.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up