0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

employer not responsible for former employee’s data breach

2 April 2020

The long-awaited Supreme Court decision has been published in the case of WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc v Various Claimants.

In 2018, the Court of Appeal found the company vicariously liable for its employee’s actions. An IT Internal Auditor, aggrieved at receiving a disciplinary sanction, copied payroll data of almost 100,000 employees and posted it on a file sharing website. This led to a class action by more than 5,000 employees.

The Supreme Court has now found that the company was not liable for the employee’s actions. His wrongful disclosure was not sufficiently closely connected with his ordinary duties that it could be regarded as being done while the employee was acting in the ordinary course of his employment. His employment simply gave him the opportunity to commit the act, in order to pursue a personal vendetta. This did not mean that the employer should be responsible for it.

The Court of Appeal decision in 2018 attracted a great deal of interest, as it meant that there was little that employers could do to protect themselves. Whilst employers still can be found vicariously liable when an employee is engaged in furthering his or her employer’s business when an act takes place, they will not be found liable where an employee was “on a frolic of their own”. Employers will breathe a sigh of relief as a result.

related opinions

Furloughed employees entitled to full pay for redundancy purposes

The government has brought in new legislation to ensure that any employees who have been furloughed will have their statutory redundancy pay calculated based on their full-time wages as opposed their furloughed pay in the event that they are made redundant.

View blog

Return to work – all change or more of the same?

The Government has announced that its workplace guidance will change with effect from 1 August and its “work from home” message will be removed.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up